to a literal, but it's not producing a
result in a SPARQL construct query - no error either...
m.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Barry Norton barrynor...@gmail.com
mailto:barrynor...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure what you mean there. You mean a variable that's not bound
to a literal
Did you chunk them, or are you trying to load all triples in one
transaction?
Barry
On 14.09.2011 20:47, Kyle Johnson wrote:
We're trying to load one billion triples into OWLIM-SE 4.2 and are
running into heap issues.
Out of one billion, we can typically load about 700 million then get
If I have the following information:
kit:barry foaf:givenName Barry;
foaf:familyName Norton;
owl:sameAs ontotext:barry2.
ontotext:barry2 foaf:nick Barry2.
Then (with inference/optimisation) I will get:
SELECT ?nick ?family where {kit:barry foaf:nick ?nick;
by
((TupleQuery) query).evaluate() ?
Regards,
Jerven
On 10/06/2011 02:37 PM, Barry Norton wrote:
Doesn't it modify the set of bindings, not the graphs that are produced
around them, in CONSTRUCT and DESCRIBE?
So if you said, for instance:
DESCRIBE ?x WHERE {?x a foaf:Person} LIMIT 100
You
to programmatically modify a Tuple or GraphQuery object to
add a limit and an offset. The closest I get is using iterators and loop to
start or end.
Am I missing a something at the Sesame level? Or is there no interface that
enables me to do this.
Regards,
Jerven
On Oct 6, 2011, at 4:14 PM, Barry Norton wrote
Seen earlier in OWLIM (by Lyndon), this is now reported in Sesame.
Barry
Original Message
Subject:[Sesame] suspect insert behavior with blank nodes in template
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:01:18 +0100
From: Alessandro Bollini alessandro.boll...@gmail.com
Reply-To:
Hi, Fabian,
Is ?text bound to a literal when it succeeds in the two queries at the top?
Barry
On 20/03/2012 14:13, Fabian Cretton wrote:
Hi,
I do have a strange behaviour that I don't understand, working with
OWLIM 4.3.
I think there is no need to provide detailed information about the
Guys, how are you shutting down your database that it needs to be
recovered so often?
And are you interrupting the recovery process?
Barry
On 31/03/2012 20:44, Blasetti, Luciano (CIOK) wrote:
Hi All,
I also experienced quite frequently this issue on a tomcat instance running
only
Any non-empty standard ruleset (including RDFS, where this is defined)
will include this, so I'm wondering if, when you set up your repository,
you chose the empty ruleset?
Barry
On 30/04/2012 14:02, Ward Blondé wrote:
Dear OWLIM developers,
I am trying to find out which reasoning
+1
But how does such a query work with forward-chaining? (Since the class
is unknown, therefore hasn't been subjected to the inference rules before)
My first idea was that maybe the class if asserted, reasoning enacted,
the query answered, then the assertion rolled back... but that's not
Sorry to jump in (hope I'm not missing something obvious), but you seem
to be forcing a graph query into a relational (SELECT) answer. Don't you
just want to do a CONSTRUCT query and navigate the subgraph?
Barry
On 17/09/2012 15:17, Stefano Ortona wrote:
Hello,
about the direct
OWLIM, as Sesame, infers triples into the unnamed graph. You've exactly
illustrated why: the triple b rdf:type y 'belongs' neither to ng1
nor ng2.
Furthermore, for good operational reasons, no truth maintenance
information is preserved. The inferred triple (which may have
justifications
, 2012 15:23
Subject: [Owlim-discussion] Inferences with named graph
To: 'Barry Norton' barry.nor...@ontotext.com,
owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
Dear all,
this makes me raise another question: is there any specification in the
RDF-world about relationship between inference and named graphs, which
. Will this last triple be
materialised too in the unnamed graph?
Best,
AZ
2012/9/28 Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com:
OWLIM, as Sesame, infers triples into the unnamed graph. You've exactly
illustrated why: the triple b rdf:type y 'belongs' neither to ng1 nor
ng2.
Furthermore, for good
For some reason the 'autodetect syntax' in the Sesame Workbench is
getting confused and trying to parse this as Turtle.
Presuming that you're trying to use that interface, can you please
re-check by explicitly selecting 'RDF/XML' from the dropdown titled
'Data format'.
Barry
On
Nazmul, which installation guide are you following?
These days, presuming you're using OWLIM 5 (or even 4), there's no need
to deal with jars, one simply places the .war files, from sesame_owlim,
into tomcat/webapps.
Please see:
With apologies for slightly missing your point, with my previous answer,
talking of standards (which SPIN isn't), note what RIF also omits:
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB#Numeric_Functions_and_Predicates
Barry
On 21/11/2012 16:52, Barry Norton wrote:
No, the standard SPARQL 1.1
That you didn't add STR(?patientid) to the FILTER suggests that there's
no datatype - why are you adding the datatype to the latter query and
expecting a match?
Barry
On 30/11/2012 16:26, Bill Duncan wrote:
I have question concerning how to match string values in labels using
a sparql
Order on which component? On subjects / predicates? On objects? If the
latter, are they all literals? If so, are they data-typed?
Perhaps it would be possible to share your query?
Barry
On 30/11/2012 16:31, Bill Duncan wrote:
Our triple store (owlim se) has around a million triples. The
Unless I misunderstood you refer to the following provision of the
SPARQL XML Results standard:
If, for a particular solution, a variable is/unbound/,
no|binding|element for that variable is included in the|result|element.
...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Dec 17, 2012 21:13
Subject: [Owlim-discussion] SPARQL XML results
To: Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com
Cc: owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
OK, another issue. If I get no results, I'm seeing the following XML when
my query returns no results:
?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl'
href
it is
unaffected.
Tobe clear we load the data using ruleset=none. Which might impact the
scenario.
The query used to work its just in the latest version that I notice it
being gone.
Regards,
Jerven
On 12/19/2012 11:03 AM, Barry Norton wrote:
Jerven, using owlim-se-5.3.5689 I just executed
/19/2012 11:38 AM, Barry Norton wrote:
Thanks for the clarification - I believe Vassil has answered the
question in the mean time, this is down to the way the data is loaded
and exposed in LinkedLifeData.
OWLIM does index the equivalence in the raw dataset and, under
appropriate conditions
On 19/12/12 12:42, Barry Norton wrote:
Jerven, confirmed I can reproduce your problem thus:
$ wget
ftp://ftp.uniprot.org/pub/databases/uniprot/current_release/rdf/citations.rdf.gz
$ gunzip citations.rdf.gz
$ curl -X POST -H Content-Type:application/rdf+xml -T citations.rdf
http://localhost:8080
are another issue, on the uniprot rdf production
site. Not for you to worry about, in any case will be fixed by the next
uniprot data release on the 9th of January.
Thanks for looking into the owl:sameAs issue.
Regards,
Jerven
On 12/19/2012 02:47 PM, Barry Norton wrote:
Further, I converted to NTriples
The beauty of the Lucene search is that you can combine it with graph
patterns, e.g. (presuming you created myIndex):
SELECT ?name
{[] luc:myIndex eugene male; :hasName ?name}
Barry
On 04/02/13 09:00, Siow Boon Lin Eugene wrote:
Hi,
As I understand, when I create the Lucene index, I
The blank node (1) just means I don't care what the subject is (it will
match a blank node or a URI-identified resource - it cannot be a literal
as it's in subject position), just that it's the centre of the molecule
and has a name attached to it.
I'm not sure you can set the parameters and
Marek, I'm struggling to understand your query.
You have a clause GRAPH http://www.ontotext.com/explicit { ?value
rdf:type ?key } but if the INSERT represents all of your explicit
statement there are none with explicit classification (i.e. pred=type).
Are you saying that:
SELECT DISTINCT
*From:* Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com
*To:* owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
*Sent:* Thursday, 14 February 2013, 12:10
*Subject:* Re: [Owlim-discussion] Query strange behavior
Marek, I'm struggling to understand your query.
You have a clause GRAPH
://www.ontotext.com/explicit { ?value rdf:type ?key } . }
In the absence of your instance data I remain, therefore, unable to
reproduce an issue.
Barry
On 14/02/13 11:26, Barry Norton wrote:
But that's what I mean, that's not reproducable - I'm missing some
instance data.
I assumed OWL
Tomas, which version/build of OWLIM-Enterprise are you using, and on
which platform (OS)?
Barry
On 14/02/13 15:46, Tomas Vileinis(kis wrote:
Hi list/devs,
I've tried everything, but the online backup mechanism doesn't seem
to work for me. As per instructions outlined in documentation:
?
Cheers,
Barry
On 14/02/13 16:02, Tomas Vileiniškis wrote:
Sorry, forgot to include these in the first email. I'm using
owlim-enterprise-5.3.5689 and Win Server 2008 R2 Standart 64-bit.
Tomas
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Barry Norton
barry.nor...@ontotext.com mailto:barry.nor
not edit the file
(rather a copy) unless you're sure those are the rules you want executed.
Barry
*From:* Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com
*To:* owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, 19 February 2013, 12
Fabian, I've copied your mail to the OWLIM discussion list.
I don't think there's any contradiction to say designed for 100MTriple
volumes but hard limit 2BTriples.
A city car is designed to tootle around at 60 kilometers an hour, but
can also be rated with a top speed; say, 150kph.
. Hence
my question as I always thought that OWLIM-lite would not work for
more than 100 million triples.
Thank you if you can find out more precision about that (you said you
did post on the OWLIM discussion)
Fabian
Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com 28.02.2013 12:15
Fabian, I've copied
Carlo, I'd personally avoid using the Workbench if you've significant
parameters to set.
In the getting-started/ folder of the distribution you'll find a set of
parameters in owlim.ttl, which you can copy and edit. One can either
instantiate a repository these with using GettingStarted.jar
one week time), the only parameter i need is ruleset as i need to
use customized rules.
Any suggestion using sesame workbench?
Carlo
--- *Gio 7/3/13, Barry Norton /barry.nor...@ontotext.com/* ha scritto:
Da: Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com
Oggetto: Re: [Owlim-discussion] setting
parameters that can not be changed once the
repository is created, e.g. the rule-set (in the case of OWLIM-SE).
I read it after i run the query, but it is working!!!.
Many Thanks,
Regards,
Carlo
--- Gio 7/3/13, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com ha scritto:
Da: Barry Norton barry.nor
#; ;
owlim:repository-type file-repository ;
owlim:console-thread false
]
].
Thank you very much for your help, please.
Best,
Carlo
--- *Gio 7/3/13, Barry Norton /barry.nor...@ontotext.com/* ha scritto:
Da: Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com
Oggetto: Re: [Owlim-discussion] setting
://www.tlo.ics.forth.gr/TLO_entity#belongsTo
18:08:45 2 result(s) in 345ms.
Why not ?z
Any help on this?Please.
Regards,
Carlo
--- *Mer 13/3/13, Barry Norton /barry.nor...@ontotext.com/* ha scritto:
Da: Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com
Oggetto: Re:
A: Carlo Allocca carloallo
suggested.
again Many Thanks,
Regards,
Carlo
--- Mer 13/3/13, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com ha scritto:
Da: Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com
Oggetto: Re:
A: Carlo Allocca carloallo...@yahoo.it
Cc: owlim-discussion@ontotext.com
Data: Mercoledì 13 marzo 2013, 20:25
If I understand
On 18 March 2013 19:25, Barry Norton barry.nor...@ontotext.com
mailto:barry.nor...@ontotext.com wrote:
Hi, Tope.
Your problem is the media type (and the path).
SELECT queries return:
application/sparql-results+xml
application/sparql-results+json
text/csv
text/tab
Danica, I'm not sure if it explains your problem, but you're not closing
all your objects:
http://trippi.sourceforge.net/api/org/trippi/impl/sesame/SesameTupleIterator.html#close()
http://trippi.sourceforge.net/api/org/trippi/impl/sesame/SesameTupleIterator.html#close%28%29
Barry
On
43 matches
Mail list logo
