¿ʇnoqɐ buıʞןɐʇ sʎnb noʎ ǝɹɐ ʇɐɥʍ
On 7 September 2010 15:46, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:43 PM, mike smith meski...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 September 2010 15:15, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM, mike smith meski...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Peter Griffith pgrif...@senet.com.auwrote:
Les,
ConvertU2 has developed an app to convert (migrate?) Access
applications to SQL Server.
The Microsoft Migrate tool and SSMA only migrate tables and don't do
that all that well.
Doesn't
I have a user control which is set to output cache using the following
command..
%@ OutputCache Duration=1000 VaryByParam=UserId %
When the usercontrol is being cached the usercontrol is no longer availble
so my code where ... usercontrol.userid=89 fails!
Do i just wrap this code in
How many forms are we talking about here?
On 7 September 2010 12:32, Les Hughes l...@datarev.com.au wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a legacy MSAccess app in VBA which is been used at two separate
office locations (Melbourne Singapore), with two separate copies of the
database.
There is a table
Les
You could always suggest some separation of the 'common' info for each
client office, and create additional and separate Melbourne-only and
Singapore-only tables.
Over years, I've done a lot of migration of databases / info systems to and
from Access. Often, the clients wanted to keep
Not sure I fully understand your question but, while the cache condition is
satisfied, none of your code around that user control code behind will be
executed (which is exactly why the cache is a good thing from a perf
perspective)
ASP.Net takes the HTML result of that user control and stores
Ian Thomas wrote:
Les
You could always suggest some separation of the 'common' info for each
client office, and create additional and separate Melbourne-only and
Singapore-only tables.
Over years, I've done a lot of migration of databases / info systems to and
from Access. Often, the clients
Thanks Paul..that does answer my question? Sugest any tool to use to see
the performance difference when i implement caching. Would be interesting
to measure the difference in performance!
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Paul Glavich
Hi Anthony,
Yes, that is the proper way - if the user control is available in cache it
will not be instantiated, so you should check for null / nothing.
See
http://authors.aspalliance.com/aspxtreme/webapps/cachingportionsofaspnetpage.aspx
Cheers,
jano
On 7 September 2010 14:57, Anthony
Thanks Jano..exactly what i was looking for!
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Jano Petras
Sent: Tuesday, 7 September 2010 11:05 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: usercontrol caching
Hi Anthony,
Yes, that is the proper way - if the user
Hey all, there is a nerd dinner tomorrow night in Melbourne at the Elephant
Wheelbarrow. On Bourke St.
It seems to be a list minute thing
Hope to see you all there
http://www.nerddinner.com/2977
-David Burela
Folks, I've been using the DataGridView control for years in anger and I
thought I'd seen it all, but I've got a problem that's been unsolvable for
over a year.
Clicking a CheckBox cell in the top row of the grid does not change the
value. In the screenshot you can see the selected cell that
12 matches
Mail list logo
