RE: A book on DbContext

Yeah, save the planet. Use electricity. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Greg Keogh Sent: Monday, 4 February 2013 6:26 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: A book on DbContext Even better. Save yourself the cost of postage and save a tree by order

Re: A book on DbContext

> > Even better. Save yourself the cost of postage and save a tree by > ordering the book electronically. > But I don't have an eBook reader (yet). Tragically I prefer to get large amounts of complex information from flattened starched stitched ex-trees that I can take with me into the back yard

RE: A book on DbContext

Even better. Save yourself the cost of postage and save a tree by ordering the book electronically. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Greg Keogh Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 9:57 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: A book on DbContext Folks, I almo

RE: SPAM-LOW Re: WCF service best practises

Now, remind me. Is System.Net.EnterpriseServices the same as System.NET.Remoting? From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Greg Keogh Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 5:21 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW Re: WCF service best practises Apparen

A book on DbContext

Folks, I almost ordered this book: http://www.bookware.com.au/cgi-bin/bookware/9781449312961 As I'm using VS2012 and the latest Entity Framework for Framework 4 (not 4.5 yet). The templates have changed a fair bit and now they use DbContext by default. However ... I'm afraid the book is already

RE: Transcription software

Hi Corneliu, Yes, I’ve always come back to using real people. I was just wondering what the state of the technology was now. Regards, Greg Dr Greg Low 1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax SQL Down Under | Web:

Re: SPAM-LOW Re: WCF service best practises

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Paul Glavich wrote: > At the risk of being argumentative, we asked for this. Maybe not you or me > specifically, but the community at large has. I agree the number of > technologies at play, particularly in this space is large but it makes it > all the more **intere

Re: Transcription software

Ask Hanselman .. he is always transcripting his recordings. I think he is using an actual person (elance, taskarmy) for few cents an hour. On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Greg Low (GregLow.com) wrote: > Hi Folks, > > ** ** > > Anyone know if there’s anything better than Dragon for transcript

Re: SPAM-LOW Re: WCF service best practises

Apparently the .NET remoting documentation has been removed and you have to hunt around in the archives for it now (I haven't looked myself), so that's probably a hint about being out-of-date. However, I have a sentimental feeling for remoting as we have an intensely used client-server app out ther

RE: SPAM-LOW Re: WCF service best practises

>> I thought that .net remoting is kind of out-of-date It kinda is and my mention at it was a failed attempt at some humour. Sorry bout that. As to your OSS project, I would hate to discourage you in any way and I don't know enough what you plan to do to recommend a particular technology. WCF

Re: New Web API project

http://clear-measure.com/i-have-a-web-forms-custom-application-should-i-upgrade-to-asp-net-mvc-now-or-wait/ On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Heinrich Breedt wrote: > this might help: > http://www.west-wind.com/weblog/posts/2012/Aug/07/Where-does-ASPNET-Web-API-Fit > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1

RE: SPAM-LOW Re: WCF service best practises

I thought that .net remoting is kind of out-of-date and shouldn't be used because of all of the new technologies. Or is it out-of-date? And now you're making me question my plans for my first Open Source project that I was going to put up in a year or two. I was going to have it use WCF hoste