RE: MSDN Subscription renewal

2015-04-22 Thread Ken Schaefer
Downloads link -> Top Downloads -> Community Edition. Seems like it’s VS only. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Greg Keogh Sent: Thursday, 23 April 2015 10:40 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: MSDN Subscription renewal I am a one-man business and

Re: MSDN Subscription renewal

2015-04-22 Thread Greg Keogh
I am a one-man business and good candidate, but some things are unclear from my reading so far. How do you actually get this "product"? I can't see any kind of registration or whatever. Do I still have an MSDN live signin like I do now with pages for downloads and licence key generation? It's great

Re: MSDN Subscription renewal

2015-04-22 Thread Corneliu I. Tusnea
Greg K, If your team is smaller than 5 people or you are an individual developer you can use it. I use it for my personal use outside of my company. I think it's a great product. Regards, Corneliu. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Greg Low (罗格雷格博士) wrote: > See the Q & A at the bottom of th

Re: MSDN Subscription renewal

2015-04-22 Thread 罗格雷格博士
See the Q & A at the bottom of the page : https://www.visualstudio.com/products/visual-studio-community-vs Regards Greg Dr Greg Low CEO and Principal Mentor SQL Down Under 1300SQLSQL (1300775775) On 22 Apr 2015, at 7:46 pm, Greg Keogh mailto:g...@mira.net>> wrote: Can I ask why would you upgr

Re: MSDN Subscription renewal

2015-04-22 Thread Greg Keogh
> > Can I ask why would you upgrade from Community to Premium and why would I > buy the MSDN pack? > I find the Community + Resharper has everything I ever wanted. > I did notice that the Community features in the chart are nearly identical to the Professional, so I'm wondering the same thing. Wha

Re: MSDN Subscription renewal

2015-04-22 Thread Corneliu I. Tusnea
Can I ask why would you upgrade from Community to Premium and why would I buy the MSDN pack? I find the Community + Resharper has everything I ever wanted. On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Greg Keogh wrote: > Ah thanks Steve, that's a good chart. Now I can see after they've shuffled > the subsc