splort hundreds? influential? worldwide? (apologies for all those
questionmarks, to whomever was commenting on them t'other day
It pleases me to imagine this is true – Greg
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Arjang Assadi arjang.ass...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Allowing people to directly play with data nullifies any attempt of
forcing business rules in a system.
It's interesting. Nobody said anything about this. Yet, you are
refuting what is arguably 'common sense',
This is a good read on the subject:
http://www.xent.com/pipermail/fork/2001-June/000438.html (relevant to
a specific mailing list but generally applicable). I appear to be
currently engaged in The Level Lunge.
--
silky
http://dnoondt.wordpress.com/
Every morning when I wake up, I experience an
David,
I have found your rant both educational and informative.
I had not considrered such a situation.The situation you described
does make Access the correct choice (at least for now, not sure what
would happen when the business grows but who does anyway?)
I would use That Depends in Access
You're crazy silky :-)
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:41 AM, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a good read on the subject:
http://www.xent.com/pipermail/fork/2001-June/000438.html (relevant to
a specific mailing list but generally applicable). I appear to be
currently engaged in The
Here is my +1.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:53 AM, David Burela david.bur...@gmail.comwrote:
Here is another idea.
Instead of focusing on argument styles, how to troll correctly, etc.
How about we just stop attacking people on this mailing list and just talk
tech.
I talk to a lot of people
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:53 AM, David Burela david.bur...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is another idea.
[... amusing irony ...]
FYI, I've asked David to discuss this with me offlist (assuming he is
talking about me). I won't comment further on the matter on the list.
I suppose my last comment would
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Les Hughes l...@datarev.com.au wrote:
[...]
We should just settle this like fine grown gentlemen a punch-on at the
'Nerd Violence Dinner' tonight in Melbourne.
While I know you and know this is meant as a joke, legitimate threats
of physical violence from
¿ʇnoqɐ buıʞןɐʇ sʎnb noʎ ǝɹɐ ʇɐɥʍ
On 7 September 2010 15:46, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:43 PM, mike smith meski...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 September 2010 15:15, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM, mike smith meski...@gmail.com
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Peter Griffith pgrif...@senet.com.auwrote:
Les,
ConvertU2 has developed an app to convert (migrate?) Access
applications to SQL Server.
The Microsoft Migrate tool and SSMA only migrate tables and don't do
that all that well.
Doesn't
How many forms are we talking about here?
On 7 September 2010 12:32, Les Hughes l...@datarev.com.au wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a legacy MSAccess app in VBA which is been used at two separate
office locations (Melbourne Singapore), with two separate copies of the
database.
There is a table
Australia
-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Les Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, 7 September 2010 11:36 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Access Database Replication
Ian Thomas wrote:
What are the problems of putting the MDB back-end
Ian Thomas wrote:
Les
You could always suggest some separation of the 'common' info for each
client office, and create additional and separate Melbourne-only and
Singapore-only tables.
Over years, I've done a lot of migration of databases / info systems to and
from Access. Often, the clients
Hi All,
I've got a legacy MSAccess app in VBA which is been used at two separate
office locations (Melbourne Singapore), with two separate copies of
the database.
There is a table with 5,000 rows in it (about 30 columns) which has
inserts/updates at both offices, and we were looking for
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Les Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, 7 September 2010 10:33 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Access Database Replication
Hi All,
I've got a legacy MSAccess app in VBA which is been used at two separate office
locations (Melbourne Singapore), with two separate
Ideally, we would either migrate the app to .NET/SQL Server (which would be
fairly expensive... management say 'grrr'), or use RDP and having the app on
one computer. (which is also for some reason is also 'g')
Is the cost of SQL due to license issues or redevelopment costs? If it
is a
Craig van Nieuwkerk wrote:
Ideally, we would either migrate the app to .NET/SQL Server (which would be
fairly expensive... management say 'grrr'), or use RDP and having the app on
one computer. (which is also for some reason is also 'g')
Is the cost of SQL due to license issues or
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Les Hughes l...@datarev.com.au wrote:
Redevelopment costs I've heard you can throw SQL Express directly on
the back of an Access App (Access 2003), has anyone had any success with
this?
Yes. The current project I am on did exactly this. We set up the SQL
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Les Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, 7 September 2010 10:33 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Access Database Replication
Hi All,
I've got a legacy MSAccess app in VBA which is been used at two separate
office locations (Melbourne Singapore), with two separate
Ian Thomas wrote:
What are the problems of putting the MDB back-end in the cloud (using the
term loosely)? Surely both ends have a permanent always-on internet
connection?
I think there is some data they don't want shared between the offices?
No idea really.
This is one of those
On 7 September 2010 15:01, noonie neale.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
On 7 September 2010 13:36, Les Hughes l...@datarev.com.au wrote:
Ian Thomas wrote:
What are the problems of putting the MDB back-end in the cloud (using the
term loosely)? Surely both ends have a permanent always-on
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM, mike smith meski...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Probably why some people have stopped asking me questions :-P
And the downside is?
That looks suspiciously like a question, meski.
--
Meski
Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure,
On 7 September 2010 15:09, mike smith meski...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 September 2010 15:01, noonie neale.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
On 7 September 2010 13:36, Les Hughes l...@datarev.com.au wrote:
Ian Thomas wrote:
What are the problems of putting the MDB back-end in the cloud
On 7 September 2010 15:15, silky michaelsli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:09 PM, mike smith meski...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Probably why some people have stopped asking me questions :-P
And the downside is?
That looks suspiciously like a question, meski.
¿sorry?
24 matches
Mail list logo
