: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of anthonyatsmall...@mail.com
Sent: Monday, 17 February 2014 11:06 AM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: Security scaremongering
I have noticed firefox complaining about Silverlight recently, saying "security
vulnerabil
: 2Anthony (at) smallbiz.com.au Postal : Po
Box 135, Lower Plenty 3093 ABN : 16 079 706 737
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Saturday, 15 February 2014 12:54 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Security scaremongering
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Greg Keogh wrote:
> Folks, one of our customers has an IT admin guy who is a Linux fan and
> runs a farm of Linux servers. He has the typical cultural anti-Microsoft
> bias that I'm sure we encounter now and then. Not normally a problem, but
> he's forwarding aro
I don't see the correlation between IE and Silverlight here - sure the
browser has some exploits that *POTENTIALLY* are available but to throw
Silverlight out is to throw Java, Flash, Quicktime etc also out.
Focus on the role not the person is your first approach, if this person is
trying to build
Why so much hate?
Haters are going to hate. I wouldn't bother, it would be like that cartoon
about someone being wrong on the internet...
On Feb 15, 2014 8:00 AM, "Greg Keogh" wrote:
> Folks, one of our customers has an IT admin guy who is a Linux fan and
> runs a farm of Linux servers. He has t
Folks, one of our customers has an IT admin guy who is a Linux fan and runs
a farm of Linux servers. He has the typical cultural anti-Microsoft bias
that I'm sure we encounter now and then. Not normally a problem, but he's
forwarding around scary emails warning of vulnerabilities in IE and
Silverli
