On 4 March 2016 at 18:03, Greg Keogh wrote:
> Folks, anyone using Azure Tables Storage in anger? I really like it, simple
> and effective.
>
> What is the query syntax equivalent of SQL "not null", that is, a row has a
> named property? I have a table with tens of thousands of
>
> lol 20 gigawatts. Hate to see your power bill. [image: ]
>
And remember that you've got to pronounce it like The Doc in *Back To the
Future* -- *GK*
This will be from the 1511 update that happened to your machine a short while
ago. It allows you to do a roll-back to the previous Windows 10 installation.
From memory, you can use the Disk Cleanup Tool (diskmgr) to remove it.
Otherwise, I believe it gets automatically removed after 30 days or
lol 20 gigawatts. Hate to see your power bill. []
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on behalf
of Greg Keogh
Sent: Monday, 7 March 2016 6:50 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: [OT] Windows.old folder
Ian, I
“It becomes a technical quiz at times to figure out how to use the pair of
string keys effectively. You can finish up putting all of the row data into the
keys! One of my live tables has a natural triple compound key, simple in a SQL
schema, but in the table I made the PartitionKey one value
OData may have a "null", but ATS certainly doesn't have the concept, or a
schema, so I'm sympathetic to the fact that IS NOT NULL will not have any
kind of direct efficient equivalent. However ... I need some way of finding
all the rows with an ErrorMessage property. If there is no way of doing
Hi Greg,
If you’re after simple, what does the Azure SQL DB T-SQL interface make hard?
You don’t even need any NuGet package to work with it. They set up and run the
DB.
Regards,
Greg
Dr Greg Low
1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 fax
SQL Down Under |
Hi Ian et al, I reckon most of the replies in the article are spot on
regarding price, capacity, speed, transactions, etc (except for the last
person who hates Table Storage for reasons I don't think are justifiable).
You have to know in your bones if your data is *relational* (normalisable)
or
GregL, thanks for the broad-ranging comments.
It’s interesting that many of the discussions (Stackoverflow and elsewhere) get
stuck on “to null or not to null”, or a black-and-white discussion about SQL vs
NoSQL databases (with little differentiation between flavours of either). Some
of them
Hi Ian,
It’s a tough question.
For me, the biggest issue is where the querying really will happen. If 100% of
the querying will happen in the application, and every object will just be
persisted to the table storage and rehydrated before querying, then a table
might suit. That usually leads
Greg, when the 15-11-2015 Windows 10 update (which is sometimes likened to a .1
update)occurred, all update records that you can see when back to zero so to
speak. But it doesn’t create a Windows.old (or mine haven’t) – that is typical
of an upgrade that can back off” to the previous installed
If it's NULL, why would you store it at all? Surely the lack of a value is NULL.
In SQL Server when they issue XML, they have an option for a way to represent
NULL. Normally they just omit the attribute. They normally only do that in case
someone is trying to derive the schema from the data. In
Folks, probably a Friday topic, but FYI ... I was doing some Sunday evening
backups and cleanups and I noticed a Windows.old folder taking about 20GB
with ~12 files in it! Now the weird thing is that I have no clear idea
when or where this came from. I didn't run or accept any major upgrades,
13 matches
Mail list logo