Re: ASP.NET Razor Pages

> Razor is so 2019. > > * They’ve come out with Blazor > now Not sure how > widely used it is, but it does reduce the number of files to create.* > I'm using Blazor and it's a fabulous replacement for ASP.NET Web Forms, MVC and JS

Re: ASP.NET Razor Pages

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020, 09:38 Paul Jackson wrote: > Razor is so 2019. > I'm missing 2019 > They’ve come out with Blazor > now > > Not sure how widely used it is, but it does reduce the number of files to > create. > > > Do you actually

RE: ASP.NET Razor Pages

Razor is so 2019. They’ve come out with Blazor now Not sure how widely used it is, but it does reduce the number of files to create. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of David Apelt

Re: ASP.NET Razor Pages

> Is anyone using ASP.NET Razor Pages in a production system? > How did I miss the release of that? It looks like a good option for simpler sites when the sprawling mystical plumbing of a full ASP.NET MVC app is overkill (which is most of the time for me). It's getting a bit silly though as we

Re: ASP.NET Razor Pages

We have a few apps here using razor pages. Simpler (less files) than mvc. Not bad but I don’t see them ever being used widely. We are mostly mvc and webforms and they work well. On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 21:45, David Apelt wrote: > Team, > > > > Is anyone using ASP.NET Razor Pages in a production

Re: ASP.NET Razor Pages

We are using them here at pd training for some of our sites. One benefit to us was that these sites were previously web forms so it was an easier transition. Grant Castner 0458 770 749 http://twitter.com/grantcastner https://au.linkedin.com/in/grantcastner From: