Laurie Kobler at Integrity Dental in Dural
and Baulkham Hills does the procedure - I think he is the one Di was
referring to in her email.
Monica Hogan at Westmead Hospital would be worth
contacting for information and support. She was part of a research project into
TT in the UK, and
Yep was Laurie Kobler, just couldnt find where I
had written it down? It may well have been Monica that I was thinking of in
Sydney, it was someone who had been involved in a trial, if I brush the cobwebs
away I may even remember more!
Cheers Di
- Original Message -
From:
A
Most
ob's should be able to snip a TT in labour ward. Seen it done many
times.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Barbara Glare
Chris BrightSent: Thursday, 18 May 2006 2:32 PMTo:
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re:
Yup, they snip other stuff 'willy-nilly' so why not a lil frenulum?JoOn 18/05/2006, at 5:57 PM, Ken Ward wrote:Most ob's should be able to snip a TT in labour ward. Seen it done many times.-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Barbara Glare Chris
Request from another list:
Most specifically, I'm looking for what percentage of (natural, normal,
unintervened) births actually need intervention/medical assistance.
There's a tricky one!
--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database:
Surely if they are (natural, normal, unintervened) it means they don't' need
medical assistance? What is the real question?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Jo
Sent: Friday, 19 May 2006 7:10 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
What she is asking is how many women actually get to birth without
interventions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mary Murphy
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 8:47 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Natural Birth
Or is she trying to establish the percentage of births that are intervened
with that actually genuinely NEEDED the intervention? That would be nigh on
impossible to obtain honest statistics on...
In terms of how many women actually get to birth without intervention, I
know the Hospital figure
Does the WHO have recommendations on the percentage of women that are likely
need help?
At 10:53 AM +0930 19/5/06, Dean Jo wrote:
What she is asking is how many women actually get to birth without
interventions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
WHO care in labour recommendations (there's quite a bit of reading involved
from chapter to chapter):-
http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/MSM_96_24/MSM_96_24_Chapter1.en.html
- Original Message -
From: Jo Bourne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
The WHO recommend that the Caesarean rate should be no more than 10%
in a population of healthy women (that is no, pre-existing medical
conditions etc). They also recommend that inductions should be no
more than 20%. Their assessment is that 80% of women can have a
perfectly normal
I bought myself Peggy Vincent's book the Baby Catcher for IMD and
have just finished reading it.
I laughed, I cried but most of all thought I was reading a book that
could have been about me.
I would encouraged everyone to read it.
Thanks Andrea for putting it on the list for IMD
Andrea
where can u buy this book is it avaliable at dymocks ect
- Original Message -
From: Andrea Quanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 1:24 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] the Baby Catcher
I bought myself Peggy Vincent's book the Baby
I bought it from Birth International
www.birthinternational.com.au
On 19/05/2006, at 2:00 PM, sharon wrote:
where can u buy this book is it avaliable at dymocks ect
- Original Message - From: Andrea Quanchi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent:
14 matches
Mail list logo