Re: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction

2006-03-05 Thread Sally-Anne Brown
@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 8:49 AM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction Hi Sally-Anne, do you have refs for those studies? Cheers, J - Original Message - From: Sally-Anne Brown To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au

Re: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction

2006-03-05 Thread Sally-Anne Brown
: RE: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction So to clarify, you mean that C/S is 60% in labours with Epidural regardless of whether it was spontaneous labour or Induction? MM   Sally-Anne wrote: re IOL and c/s.two australian authors have looked at c/s

Re: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction

2006-03-05 Thread Mh
l. Monica - Original Message - From: "Mary Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 11:29 PM Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction Amy asks "Is the "failed induction-requiring C/s" rate really around 50%?" Monica

RE: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction

2006-03-05 Thread Mary Murphy
So to clarify, you mean that C/S is 60% in labours with Epidural regardless of whether it was spontaneous labour or Induction? MM   Sally-Anne wrote: re IOL and c/s.two australian authors have looked at c/s with epidural block. both concluded it is around 60% with edb. bo

Re: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction

2006-03-05 Thread Janet Fraser
Hi Sally-Anne, do you have refs for those studies? Cheers, J - Original Message - From: Sally-Anne Brown To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 6:29 AM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction Dear all   re IOL and

Re: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction

2006-03-05 Thread Sally-Anne Brown
regardless of whether there was IOL or not.   Sally-Anne - Original Message - From: Mary Murphy To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 11:29 PM Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction Amy asks "Is the "failed

RE: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction

2006-03-05 Thread Mary Murphy
Amy asks "Is the "failed induction-requiring C/s" rate really around 50%?" Monica replies "no, IOLs resulting in CS at something like 32%"   Ooo-err!  Not a ½  only 1/3.  Still a lot of inductions result in C/s. I see Amy’s dilemma.  According to the medical advice she has ¼ chance of s

Re: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction

2006-03-05 Thread Mh
- Original Message - From: "adamnamy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 11:32 PM Subject: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction -snip- Is the "failed induction-requiring C/s" rate really around 50%? -snip- It certainly isn't where I work! In our tertiary leve

RE: [ozmidwifery] on the subject of induction

2006-03-04 Thread Mary Murphy
Title: Message Hi Amy, re the syntocinon.  This can be controlled by turning up or down the delivery rate on the IVAC, so isn’t really the problem with hyperstimulation.  The Ptostin gel is put on the cervix and once there and absorbed cannot be controlled easily.  So, it is the Gel that is