mmm. Suzi
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
& Jo
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 8:25
PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] trials
vaginal birth not achieved in 24 hours
misoprostol 46.0%
v
dinoprostone 41.2%
okay so
On 3/4/06, Dean & Jo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
cs what happened to the
> other 23.3% that didn't birth vaginally
What the research said was that 23.3% did not deliver within 24hours.
So they either failed to be inducded at all or took longer than
24hours to birth their babies.
>
> Also, are
Title: Message
the
sad thing is that she works at a teaching hospital where they have only one
thing they are familiar with -managed birth...so they are perpetuating the
status quo. it is sad Mary.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.37
suite of our large teaching hospital where about
5,000 women give birth. Some high risk but most potentially normal birth. She
was thrilled to hear about the birth. She said she “never” sees anything like
it where she works. How sad,. MM
Subject: RE:
[ozmidwifery] trials
vaginal
Title: Message
vaginal birth not achieved in 24 hours
misoprostol 46.0%
v
dinoprostone 41.2%
okay so if
46% did not birth vaginally and 22.7% had cs what happened to the
other 23.3% that didn't birth vaginally
Also, are
women going to be told that they have almost a 50% chance of
