Title: Message
-Original Message-From: Abbott, Sarah (Sen C. Moore)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 11:11
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [leftq-notice]
FW: Letter US Congress PBS
USFTA-Original Message-From: Tracy
Schrader [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why did we get this? Trish
B G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message
nbsp;
-Original Message-From: Abbott, Sarah (Sen C. Moore)
[/email/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 11:11
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [leftq-notice]
FW: Letter US Congress PBS
Did anyone catch the 60 minutes mailbag last
night? I didn't see it and was wonderingwhat comments were
madeabout the horrendous Mothers' Choice segment.
Helen Cahill
Hello
friends and colleagues,
As we
midwives care about families and children, I thought you would want to know
about this.
in
solidarity, Carolyn Hastie
-Original Message-From: ChilOut
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 6:22
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: June
Hello all,
Just a reminder that the Birth Matters SA group is holding
another of our highly successful, and well attended coffee mornings this week,
on Thursday. See below for details, and it would be great to see you
there! Midwives, students, women, partners, parents, friends, all
Birth Matters SA are meeting this Thursday, which is actually
June!
Tania
One letter called elective caesarean birth a cop out
One letter proclaimed how the surgery saved her and her baby.
One letter wondered at the convenience of choosing baby's birth date and asked
how many babies would be scheduled after July 1 to catch the $3000 maternity
payment.
No surprises
Title: FW: 60 Mins Caesarean Section
Hi all Heres a message to Ann and a letter to the Ed
JC
xx
-- Forwarded Message
From: Justine Caines [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 23:45:27 +1100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 60 Mins Caesarean Section
Dear Ann
I was disappointed to see
Title: FW: 60 Mins & Caesarean Section
Well said Justine!
I recently attended an ACMI Seminar in WA on
Waterbirth. A neonatologist who spoke reported some statistics
whichare worthemphasising in our talks withwomen, and letters
tomedia -
Babies born by caesarean section are 16
times more
Title: FW: 60 Mins & Caesarean Section
Hi Justine,
Well said, and eloquent as ever! I want to personally
thank you for that which you do for women and babiesand you do it so
well.
Love,
Joy
Joy Cocks RN (Div 1) RM CBE IBCLCBRIGHT Vic 3741
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message
Title: FW: 60 Mins & Caesarean Section
Do you have refs for these stats lois?
pinky
- Original Message -
From:
Lois
Wattis
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:57
AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] FW: 60 Mins
Caesarean Section
Well said
Title: FW: 60 Mins & Caesarean Section
Yes, a sheet of refs was provided by ACMI at the
conference. I will just need to locate them, and I'll post them to the
list. Cheers, Lois
- Original Message -
From:
Pinky McKay
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004
Title: FW: 60 Mins & Caesarean Section
Fabulous, Justine - thanks for all the work you
do.
Pinky
- Original Message -
From:
Justine Caines
To: OzMid List
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 10:46
PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] FW: 60 Mins
Caesarean Section
Hi all Heres a
Thanks Jodie
Doesn't sound like I missed much.
Helen
- Original Message -
From: Jodie Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] 60 minutes mailbag
One letter called elective caesarean birth a cop out
One
14 matches
Mail list logo
