20061113-80# Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage by uterotonic agents:
comparison of oxytocin and methylergo metrine in the management of the thirs
stage of labor - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica , vol 85, no
11, 2006, pp 1310-1314 Fujimoto M; Takeuchi K; Sugimoto M; et al - (2006)
Jennifairy said
I wonder how many of these women had inductions (for eg)?
Ive also seen (during my student experiences, so have other current
students) some midwives doctors apply CCT without giving synt,
describing this as 'physiological' 3rd stage. There are lots of 'mixed
managements' of
ing away on it's own, people!
: (
J
- Original Message -
From:
Sue
Cookson
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 6:49 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels
soar
Hi,This article appeared in last week's Sydney Morning
Herald.I think it's am
Hi,
This article appeared in last week's Sydney Morning Herald.
I think it's amazing and it appears that some of the information is
incorrect in that the article states that NSW Health implemented active
thrid stage and early cord clamping in 2002. Surely syntometrine and
syntocinon have been
I know that homeopaths believe that the same thing you give to fix a symptom
can cause that symptom in a well person, or given in the wrong dose for the
individual. This is how they prove a homeopathic treatment. I don't know if I
have explained that very well...
Here is a link about
, blood
transfusion uuugg would've eaten a horse to avoid that again!
Jo
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Bourne
Sent: Sunday, 11 June 2006 9:10 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar
I know
blood
transfusions, but lower Hb's acceptable. It is scary. Maureen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jo
Sent: Sunday, 11 June 2006 9:26 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar
Yeah, sucking on a piece
Sue Cookson wrote:
Hi,
This article appeared in last week's Sydney Morning Herald.
I think it's amazing and it appears that some of the information is
incorrect in that the article states that NSW Health implemented
active thrid stage and early cord clamping in 2002. Surely
syntometrine and
]
On Behalf Of Honey Acharya
Sent: Monday, 3 April 2006 10:03
AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH
C/S
Its all about what she wants and is
prepared to do to get it.
very true
I say this a lot lately!
- Original Message -
From: Andrea
anyway. Initially anyway. Katy.
- Original Message -
From:
Melissa Singer
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 8:52
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH
C/S
Maybe the thinking is should she have another
large PPH there is already
@
BellyBelly
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: 01 April, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH
C/S
Hello
all,
A woman on my forums has had two
normal births of big babies 11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her
Ob is now recommending a c/s
, doesn't mean they will have a PPH, simply that they grow bigger bubs, and have a pelvis to fit them thru. CheersRobyn D- Original Message -From: Kelly @ BellyBellyTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSent: 01 April, 2006 4:26 PMSubject: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/SHello all, A woman on my forums has
"Its all about
what she wants and is prepared to do to get it."
very true
I say this a lot lately!
- Original Message -
From:
Andrea
Quanchi
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:48
AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] P
-
From:
Nicole
Carver
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 4:44
PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH
C/S
Women also have PPH's at caesarean. Not sure if c/s would be safer.
Perhaps she should see another ob for a second opinion.
Nicole
Kelly @ BellyBelly wrote:
Hello all,
A woman on my forums has
had two normal births of big babies
11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her Ob
is now recommending a c/s with her third bub and wants a scan at 34
weeks as a deciding
factor of this. She wants a
GD, always normal vaginal births and
peri intact everytime.
Kind Regards
Sally-Anne
- Original Message -
From:
Kelly @
BellyBelly
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 4:26
PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH
C/S
Hello
all
@acegraphics.com.au
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au]
On Behalf Of Sally-Anne Brown
Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2006 9:00 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH
C/S
Dear Kelly
Re PPH:
It would be interesting to find out if this woman was
induced or had
@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 6:44 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S
Women
also have PPH's at caesarean. Not sure if c/s would be safer. Perhaps she should
see another ob for a second opinion.
Nicole.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
, 2006 11:28 AM
Subject: Fw: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S
I have heard that a standard 100mls is lost with every c/s. How big was
this womens pph. Its strange (or typical) how at a vaginal birth a women
can loose 600mls and thats a considered pph but at a c/s 100mls is not.
Lyn
- Original
: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH
C/S
Who is doing the caesars to get such a huge loss? The usual
blood loss for uncomplicated c/s where I work is 3-400mls, I think that is
pretty well par for the course.Monica- Original Message -
From: "lyn lyn" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
o
-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of brendamanning
Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2006 2:46 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH
C/S
I think it's
because allthe liquor is measured in with the blood loss in the suction
bottles at a C/S. It totals 1000mls but 50
Hello all,
A woman on my forums has had two normal births of big babies
11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her Ob
is now recommending a c/s with her third bub and wants a scan at 34 weeks as a deciding
factor of this. She wants a normal birth is it okay just for her to say
She CAN always say no. How bad were the other PPH's? Enough to
really comprimise her? She is probably at risk of another but it
might still happen if she has a CS.
Cheers
Judy
--- Kelly @ BellyBelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
A woman on my forums has had two normal births of
support vbac in
both instancesI will see if I can find them.
Jo
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly @
BellyBellySent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 3:57 PMTo:
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] PPH
C/S
:
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] PPH
C/S
Hello
all,
A woman on my forums has had two
normal births of big babies 11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her
Ob is now recommending a c/s with her third
bub and wants a scan at 34 weeks
] On Behalf Of
EmilySent: Friday, November 18, 2005 9:26 AMTo:
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] PPH
risks
hi everyonedoes anyone know of any evidence on
the volume of PPHs averted by active management? the big studies 'show'
(whether flawed or not) that active
- Original Message -
From:
Emily
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 8:56
AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH risks
hi everyonedoes anyone know of any evidence on
the volume of PPHs averted by active management? the big studies 'show
after a 700ml loss so have they had a
pph?)
I'm not sure I've said this very well so maybe
reading the trial for yourself will make it clearer.
Lisa
From: Emily
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 9:26
AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH risks
hi
HyndSent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 8:34 PMTo:
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery]
PPH
What about the relevance ofstored iron
or ferritin levels??
Denise Hynd
"Let us support one another, not just in philosophy but in action, for the
sake of freedom for all women to choose ex
- Original Message -
From:
Jenny
Cameron
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 2:18
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH
Hello Monica
As far as I know WHO call 500ml a PPH. They
acknowledge that 1000mls is probably manageable physi
Hi Monica,
In the WHO guide to care in childbirth it says is that up to 1000 ml blood lossmay be physiological in healthy populations. This WHO guide was published in 1997 I think, and I haven't yet seen a more recent edition. You can purchase it through Birth International
@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 3:01
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH
Hi Monica,
In the WHO guide to care in childbirth it says is that up to 1000 ml
blood lossmay be physiological in healthy populations. This WHO
guide was published in 1997 I think, and I haven't
There were some references a while ago about the WHO defininf a PPH as being
over 1000 mls. As we are being required to go the most extreme lengths to
treat PPHs of 500mls or more, even if not causing any symptoms and
bleeding is settling, I would love some evidence to suggest this is
Hi all,
I sent this yesterday but it didn't come through to me at least so apologies
if it's a repeat.
There were some references a while ago about the WHO defininition of a PPH
as being over 1000 mls. As we are now being required to go the most extreme
lengths to treat PPHs of 500mls or more,
An old method still useful in modern times FYI: MM
From Medscape Ob/Gyn
Women's Health
MedGenMed Ob/Gyn Women's Health
Uterovaginal Packing With Rolled Gauze in Postpartum
Hemorrhage
Case Report
Posted 02/13/2004 Rashmi Bagga, MD;
From Midwifery Today E-News: At the
beginning of my practice as a midwife, we had a homebirth client who was
expecting her fourth baby. She had hemorrhaged badly after each of her prior
hospital births. I called [midwife/herbalist] Lisa Goldstein and asked her,
expecting a negative answer,
36 matches
Mail list logo