[ozmidwifery] PPH

2006-11-17 Thread Mary Murphy
20061113-80# Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage by uterotonic agents: comparison of oxytocin and methylergo metrine in the management of the thirs stage of labor - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica , vol 85, no 11, 2006, pp 1310-1314 Fujimoto M; Takeuchi K; Sugimoto M; et al - (2006)

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar

2006-06-12 Thread Lisa Barrett
Jennifairy said I wonder how many of these women had inductions (for eg)? Ive also seen (during my student experiences, so have other current students) some midwives doctors apply CCT without giving synt, describing this as 'physiological' 3rd stage. There are lots of 'mixed managements' of

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar

2006-06-12 Thread Janet Fraser
ing away on it's own, people! : ( J - Original Message - From: Sue Cookson To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 6:49 PM Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar Hi,This article appeared in last week's Sydney Morning Herald.I think it's am

[ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar

2006-06-11 Thread Sue Cookson
Hi, This article appeared in last week's Sydney Morning Herald. I think it's amazing and it appears that some of the information is incorrect in that the article states that NSW Health implemented active thrid stage and early cord clamping in 2002. Surely syntometrine and syntocinon have been

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar

2006-06-11 Thread Jo Bourne
I know that homeopaths believe that the same thing you give to fix a symptom can cause that symptom in a well person, or given in the wrong dose for the individual. This is how they prove a homeopathic treatment. I don't know if I have explained that very well... Here is a link about

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar

2006-06-11 Thread jo
, blood transfusion uuugg would've eaten a horse to avoid that again! Jo -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Bourne Sent: Sunday, 11 June 2006 9:10 PM To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar I know

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar

2006-06-11 Thread Ken Ward
blood transfusions, but lower Hb's acceptable. It is scary. Maureen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jo Sent: Sunday, 11 June 2006 9:26 PM To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar Yeah, sucking on a piece

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH levels soar

2006-06-11 Thread Jennifairy
Sue Cookson wrote: Hi, This article appeared in last week's Sydney Morning Herald. I think it's amazing and it appears that some of the information is incorrect in that the article states that NSW Health implemented active thrid stage and early cord clamping in 2002. Surely syntometrine and

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-12 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly
] On Behalf Of Honey Acharya Sent: Monday, 3 April 2006 10:03 AM To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S Its all about what she wants and is prepared to do to get it. very true I say this a lot lately! - Original Message - From: Andrea

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-02 Thread Katy O'Neill
anyway. Initially anyway. Katy. - Original Message - From: Melissa Singer To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 8:52 PM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S Maybe the thinking is should she have another large PPH there is already

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-02 Thread Robyn Dempsey
@ BellyBelly To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: 01 April, 2006 4:26 PM Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S Hello all, A woman on my forums has had two normal births of big babies – 11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her Ob is now recommending a c/s

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-02 Thread Andrea Quanchi
, doesn't mean they will have a PPH, simply that they grow bigger bubs, and have a pelvis to fit them thru. CheersRobyn D- Original Message -From: Kelly @ BellyBellyTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSent: 01 April, 2006 4:26 PMSubject: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/SHello all, A woman on my forums has

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-02 Thread Honey Acharya
"Its all about what she wants and is prepared to do to get it." very true I say this a lot lately! - Original Message - From: Andrea Quanchi To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:48 AM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] P

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-01 Thread Melissa Singer
- From: Nicole Carver To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 4:44 PM Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S Women also have PPH's at caesarean. Not sure if c/s would be safer. Perhaps she should see another ob for a second opinion. Nicole

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-01 Thread G Lemay
Kelly @ BellyBelly wrote: Hello all, A woman on my forums has had two normal births of big babies 11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her Ob is now recommending a c/s with her third bub and wants a scan at 34 weeks as a deciding factor of this. She wants a

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-01 Thread Sally-Anne Brown
GD, always normal vaginal births and peri intact everytime. Kind Regards Sally-Anne - Original Message - From: Kelly @ BellyBelly To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 4:26 PM Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S Hello all

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-01 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly
@acegraphics.com.au [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Sally-Anne Brown Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2006 9:00 AM To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S Dear Kelly Re PPH: It would be interesting to find out if this woman was induced or had

Fw: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-01 Thread lyn lyn
@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 6:44 PM Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S Women also have PPH's at caesarean. Not sure if c/s would be safer. Perhaps she should see another ob for a second opinion. Nicole. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-01 Thread Mh
, 2006 11:28 AM Subject: Fw: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S I have heard that a standard 100mls is lost with every c/s. How big was this womens pph. Its strange (or typical) how at a vaginal birth a women can loose 600mls and thats a considered pph but at a c/s 100mls is not. Lyn - Original

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-01 Thread brendamanning
: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S Who is doing the caesars to get such a huge loss? The usual blood loss for uncomplicated c/s where I work is 3-400mls, I think that is pretty well par for the course.Monica- Original Message - From: "lyn lyn" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: o

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-04-01 Thread Mary Murphy
-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of brendamanning Sent: Sunday, 2 April 2006 2:46 PM To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S I think it's because allthe liquor is measured in with the blood loss in the suction bottles at a C/S. It totals 1000mls but 50

[ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-03-31 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly
Hello all, A woman on my forums has had two normal births of big babies 11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her Ob is now recommending a c/s with her third bub and wants a scan at 34 weeks as a deciding factor of this. She wants a normal birth is it okay just for her to say

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-03-31 Thread Judy Chapman
She CAN always say no. How bad were the other PPH's? Enough to really comprimise her? She is probably at risk of another but it might still happen if she has a CS. Cheers Judy --- Kelly @ BellyBelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, A woman on my forums has had two normal births of

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-03-31 Thread Dean Jo
support vbac in both instancesI will see if I can find them. Jo -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly @ BellyBellySent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 3:57 PMTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S

2006-03-31 Thread Nicole Carver
: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] PPH C/S Hello all, A woman on my forums has had two normal births of big babies 11lb3oz and 13lb5oz and had a PPH with both. Her Ob is now recommending a c/s with her third bub and wants a scan at 34 weeks

RE: [ozmidwifery] PPH risks

2005-11-17 Thread Dean Jo
] On Behalf Of EmilySent: Friday, November 18, 2005 9:26 AMTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] PPH risks hi everyonedoes anyone know of any evidence on the volume of PPHs averted by active management? the big studies 'show' (whether flawed or not) that active

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH risks

2005-11-17 Thread Anne Clarke
- Original Message - From: Emily To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 8:56 AM Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH risks hi everyonedoes anyone know of any evidence on the volume of PPHs averted by active management? the big studies 'show

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH risks

2005-11-17 Thread Lisa Barrett
after a 700ml loss so have they had a pph?) I'm not sure I've said this very well so maybe reading the trial for yourself will make it clearer. Lisa From: Emily To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 9:26 AM Subject: [ozmidwifery] PPH risks hi

FW: [ozmidwifery] PPH

2005-03-21 Thread Jackie Doolan
HyndSent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 8:34 PMTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH What about the relevance ofstored iron or ferritin levels?? Denise Hynd "Let us support one another, not just in philosophy but in action, for the sake of freedom for all women to choose ex

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH

2005-03-19 Thread Denise Hynd
- Original Message - From: Jenny Cameron To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 2:18 PM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH Hello Monica As far as I know WHO call 500ml a PPH. They acknowledge that 1000mls is probably manageable physi

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH

2005-03-18 Thread Michelle Windsor
Hi Monica, In the WHO guide to care in childbirth it says is that up to 1000 ml blood lossmay be physiological in healthy populations. This WHO guide was published in 1997 I think, and I haven't yet seen a more recent edition. You can purchase it through Birth International

Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH

2005-03-18 Thread Jenny Cameron
@acegraphics.com.au Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] PPH Hi Monica, In the WHO guide to care in childbirth it says is that up to 1000 ml blood lossmay be physiological in healthy populations. This WHO guide was published in 1997 I think, and I haven't

[ozmidwifery] PPH

2005-03-17 Thread mh
There were some references a while ago about the WHO defininf a PPH as being over 1000 mls. As we are being required to go the most extreme lengths to treat PPHs of 500mls or more, even if not causing any symptoms and bleeding is settling, I would love some evidence to suggest this is

[ozmidwifery] PPH

2005-03-17 Thread mh
Hi all, I sent this yesterday but it didn't come through to me at least so apologies if it's a repeat. There were some references a while ago about the WHO defininition of a PPH as being over 1000 mls. As we are now being required to go the most extreme lengths to treat PPHs of 500mls or more,

[ozmidwifery] PPH interesting. (long)

2004-02-25 Thread Mary Murphy
An old method still useful in modern times FYI: MM From Medscape Ob/Gyn Women's Health MedGenMed Ob/Gyn Women's Health Uterovaginal Packing With Rolled Gauze in Postpartum Hemorrhage Case Report Posted 02/13/2004 Rashmi Bagga, MD;

[ozmidwifery] PPH

2004-01-21 Thread Mary Murphy
From Midwifery Today E-News: At the beginning of my practice as a midwife, we had a homebirth client who was expecting her fourth baby. She had hemorrhaged badly after each of her prior hospital births. I called [midwife/herbalist] Lisa Goldstein and asked her, expecting a negative answer,