Sally Westbury wrote:
What I find
really interesting is that I can
see lots of obstetric guidelines but no midwifery guidelines.
Sally
Another interesting thing about taking fetal heart tones in ANY way is
that it's not an evidence based practise. It's
Of Sally
WestburySent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:43 AMTo:
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] fetal heart
monitoring.
I’ve been
looking at patterns of intermittent auscultation for midwifery
practice.
It seems
that little is published outside the NICE guidelines
What I find really interesting is that I can
see lots of obstetric guidelines but no midwifery guidelines.
Sally
@acegraphics.com.auSubject: RE: [ozmidwifery] fetal
heart monitoring.
What I find really
interesting is that I can see lots of obstetric guidelines but no midwifery
guidelines.
Sally
--No virus found in this incoming message.Checked by
AVG Anti-Virus.Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database
Ive
been looking at patterns of intermittent auscultation for midwifery practice.
It seems
that little is published outside the NICE guidelines but the ACOG say
The
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) states that with
specific intervals, intermittent auscultation
cant seem to find it at the moment.
Cheers
Alesa
Alesa KoziolClinical Midwifery EducatorMelbourne
- Original Message -
From:
Sally Westbury
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:13
AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] fetal heart
monitoring
