Hi All,
I should preface my questions by saying that I am *not* an infrastructure
specialist, but a SharePoint Architect and Conslultant, and am in the
process of specifying the infrastructure for a new SharePoint 2010
production farm within the organisation I work, and the question of any
The first things I would look at is:
1) What do your infrastructure guys know/use/support/use for other
applications.
2) Do you have backup/dr that supports either or both of the hypervisors.
From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of
Trevor
Hi,
I prefer VmWare, simply because I am more comfortable with it - most places I
have worked at use ESX as their virtualization solution.
I think it is still recommended that your SQL cluster is physical, though it
works ok when virtualised as well (my current employer has SQL 2008 R2
+1
If you have the luxury of massive IOPS then you'd just virtualize the SQL
cluster as well.
Virtualisation has come a very long way, especially now we have the ability
to run 64bit guests.
If you do have fast disk, the benefits of virtualisation massively outweigh
physical machines
Hey Nigel,
Is the dell PDF where you got the IOP requirements or anther resource?
Regards,
Chris Grist | Senior Technical Consultant MCITP, MCPD, MCTS, VCP, CCA
[cid:imageadcad5.PNG@8815fff5.49a1e3d6]
Applications | Infrastructure | Consulting
Tel 1300 LOFTUS | Mob 0432 898 500
Ground Floor,
