Re: Content Types

I have suggested splitting, but he does seem too keen. We are looking at renaming CT by prefixing the division name before the CT name On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Sezai Komur wrote: > Is splitting this document library up into multiple document libraries an > option? > > Sezai. > > On Mon,

Re: Content Types

Is splitting this document library up into multiple document libraries an option? Sezai. On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ajay wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I have a client using a document library with 30 content types and each > has different template. > > He wants to make it more usable. > > We have

RE: Content Types and SharePoint 2010

: Thursday, 21 April 2011 8:42 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types and SharePoint 2010 And still she gets awarded an MVP. J From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Aaron Saikovski Sent: Monday, 18 April 2011 2:09 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content

RE: Content Types and SharePoint 2010

And still she gets awarded an MVP. :) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Aaron Saikovski Sent: Monday, 18 April 2011 2:09 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types and SharePoint 2010 Have a chat to Elaine Van Bergen about this. She has some very

Re: Content Types and SharePoint 2010

> *From:* ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] *On > Behalf Of *Alex Hobson > *Sent:* Monday, 18 April 2011 1:59 PM > *To:* ozMOSS > *Subject:* Re: Content Types and SharePoint 2010 > > > > Yeah saw that element. In my Common CT i have added the Remove

RE: Content Types and SharePoint 2010

m] On Behalf Of Brian Farnhill Sent: Monday, 18 April 2011 12:02 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types and SharePoint 2010 You could just accept that doing things declaratively through CAML is just horrible and write some code to fix your columns up in the feature receiver :) [Description: Descriptio

RE: Content Types and SharePoint 2010

On Behalf Of Alex Hobson Sent: Monday, 18 April 2011 1:59 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: Re: Content Types and SharePoint 2010 Yeah saw that element. In my Common CT i have added the RemoveFieldRef element to remove the Title field but to no effect. The Title field will remain. If i add the FieldRef f

Re: Content Types and SharePoint 2010

Yeah saw that element. In my Common CT i have added the RemoveFieldRef element to remove the Title field but to no effect. The Title field will remain. If i add the FieldRef for Title after the RemoveFieldRef i again have duplicate columns. On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Sezai Komur wrote: > ?

Re: Content Types and SharePoint 2010

? http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa543602.aspx http://sharepointlive.blogspot.com/2009/05/content-types-inheritance-how-to-remove.html http://www.u2u.info/Blogs/karine/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=6 No i

Re: Content Types and SharePoint 2010

In MOSS 2007 the SystemPage CT did not have the attribute Inherits="TRUE" so when our Common CT inherited from SystemPage and we changed the DisplayName we did not have an issue. If you have a look the Document (0x0101) and Item (0x01) CTs you will see what i mean. The Item CT has the Title Field

RE: Content Types and SharePoint 2010

SystemPage CT has already got the build-in Title field inherited from 'Item' CT, and this is what is causing the duplicate error. Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:29:26 +1000 Subject: Content Types and SharePoint 2010 From: a...@hobsonator.com To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com We have run into an interesting

RE: Content Types

Hi Peter, This is pretty unusual because these content types should be sealed. Anyways...I think this is what you're after. Page Layout Content Types Article Page /_layouts/CreatePage.aspx Redirect Page "" "" Welcome Page "" "" Publishing Content Types Page

RE: Content Types

Article Page is what you'll be interested in if you want to create publishing content types for WCM. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Peter Milliner Sent: Friday, 19 February 2010 12:44 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: Content Types Hello all, We

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

zmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Tuesday, 3 November 2009 9:08 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing You should be sent to MS in Redmond so you can tell them all about it... I'll leave it to Dan to organise :-) Regards, Paul Turner S

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

.com [ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone [paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au] Sent: Tuesday, 3 November 2009 8:38 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing Brilliant. As for presenting to SPUG, I keep telling you, unless the title of my presentation is “101 SharePoi

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

Brown Sent: Tuesday, 3 November 2009 8:59 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing Haha, normally I'd jump on it, but I'm a bit under the hammer at the moment :( I'll make you a deal.. come down and present at the user group and I'll write it :P However

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

plex 1 day. From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Tuesday, 3 November 2009 8:32 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing And you would be just the man to write it, yes? ;) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-bo

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

And you would be just the man to write it, yes? ;) From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel W. Brown Sent: Tuesday, 3 November 2009 8:56 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing LOL Paul :P You're a man full of ideas

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

2009 8:28 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing Agreed, agreed! And there should be an easy way to either lock them down or reparent them in the event they become orphaned through misadventure! From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On B

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

__ From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Daniel W. Brown [dan...@danielbrown.id.au] Sent: Tuesday, 3 November 2009 8:21 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing > For future reference, the predicament you currently find y

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

Subject: RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing Ø For future reference, the predicament you currently find yourself in is precisely why Site Columns should always be used for these purposes. Their early should either be functionality to create a content type from a list .. or my preference

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

range" column. Content Types should be just how it's done :P From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Tuesday, 3 November 2009 8:22 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing Mike, if you're not that ke

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

Mike, if you're not that keen on coding you can grab SPSource to suck down the columns as XML schema definitions for re-use in a Site Column feature

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

t you're doing. " -- Warren Buffet From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of MacDonald, Mike [...@ibtteam.com] Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 11:56 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing To clarify – I c

RE: Content Types - Exporting and importing

To clarify - I created a list level content type and want to convert it to a site level for use elsewhere. Is that possible? From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of MacDonald, Mike Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 9:46 AM To: ozMOSS Subject: Content

RE: content types.

You'll need to do some reading around building your own Document Information Panel in InfoPath to get certain site columns to render. Some site columns won't render if they are a certain type. I've collected various links on it here: http://www.diigo.com/user/jthake/documentinformationpanel Fr

RE: Content types ...

hanks Uzma. That's another nice can of worms you've opened. :) From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Noone Sent: Friday, 6 March 2009 9:06 AM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Content types ... Thanks for the tip Clayton. When you add a new field to a c

RE: Content types ...

e XML. Also worth noting that Lookup Lists cannot be defined in XML. From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Thursday, 5 March 2009 8:55 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Content types ... Same problem here... I'd say it is a bug... driv

RE: Content types ...

r, ICT CEO Sydney From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Thursday, 5 March 2009 9:55 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Content types ... Same problem here... I'd say it is a bug... drives me nuts. :( Clearing/deleting the content type and

RE: Content types ...

9 07:30:45 -0500 From: clayt...@flarepoint.com.au Subject: RE: Content types ... To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Read the *!Important* section on the following MSDN article http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms479975.aspx Clayton James FlarePoint Pty Ltd |t +61 7 3821 7178 |f + 61 7 3821 71

RE: Content types ...

ss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Clayton James Sent: Thursday, 5 March 2009 10:28 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Content types ... Be aware that Content Type deployment via Features using declarative XML doesn't work with inheritance changes. For example, your content type &

RE: Content types ...

Clayton James FlarePoint Pty Ltd |t +61 7 3821 7178 |f + 61 7 3821 7175 |m 0402 463 276 | w http://www.flarepoint.com.au<http://www.flarepoint.com.au/> From: ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Paul Turner Sent: Thursday, 5 March 2009 8:55 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Sub

RE: Content types ...

ozmoss@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozm...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Uzma Naz Sent: Thursday, 5 March 2009 9:10 PM To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Subject: RE: Content types ... Thanks for the reply Paul, in a way it's good to see that I'm not the only one seeing these problems! The sites are publishing sites

RE: Content types ...

ntent type features for future plans! Many thanks, Uzma Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:50:53 +1100 From: paul.no...@ceosyd.catholic.edu.au Subject: RE: Content types ... To: ozmoss@ozmoss.com Hi Uzma, Are the doc libraries on publishing sites, or WSS sites with publishing feature en

RE: Content types ...

Hi Uzma, Are the doc libraries on publishing sites, or WSS sites with publishing feature enabled? I have seen this in our farm too. At first I thought it may have been due to accidental changes to the content types on the doc libraries. For example, if someone inadvertently made changes to an