[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiaoyu Yao updated HDDS-3509:
-
Target Version/s: 0.7.0 (was: 0.6.0)
> Closing container with unhealthy replica on open pipeline
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159682#comment-17159682
]
Xiaoyu Yao commented on HDDS-3509:
--
Move to 0.7.0 for comprehensive design on how to close containers on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiaoyu Yao updated HDDS-3907:
-
Target Version/s: 0.7.0 (was: 0.6.0)
> Topology related acceptance test is flaky
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
runzhiwang updated HDDS-3952:
-
Summary: Merge small container (was: Make container could be reopened)
> Merge small container
>
adoroszlai commented on pull request #1104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1104#issuecomment-659851288
Thanks @arp7, @elek for high-level review, @bharatviswa504 for the detailed
reviews, @ChenSammi for testing and committing it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bharat Viswanadham resolved HDDS-3977.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
> Add design doc link of OM HA to ozone docs
>
Bharat Viswanadham created HDDS-3977:
Summary: Add design doc link of OM HA to ozone docs
Key: HDDS-3977
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3977
Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159664#comment-17159664
]
Bharat Viswanadham commented on HDDS-3967:
--
[~Sammi] This is committed only to apache main. I
bharatviswa504 commented on a change in pull request #1211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1211#discussion_r456210475
##
File path:
hadoop-ozone/ozonefs-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/ozone/BasicOzoneFileSystem.java
##
@@ -721,7 +723,13 @@ public
avijayanhwx commented on pull request #1210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1210#issuecomment-659832842
cc @fapifta
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
avijayanhwx commented on a change in pull request #1211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1211#discussion_r456206292
##
File path:
hadoop-ozone/ozonefs-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/ozone/BasicOzoneFileSystem.java
##
@@ -721,7 +723,13 @@ public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sammi Chen updated HDDS-3612:
-
Fix Version/s: 0.6.0
> Allow mounting bucket under other volume
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sammi Chen updated HDDS-3612:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Allow mounting bucket under other
ChenSammi merged pull request #1104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1104
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
ChenSammi commented on pull request #1104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1104#issuecomment-659831676
Thanks @adoroszlai for the contribution and @bharatviswa504 for the review.
This is an automated message
ChenSammi commented on a change in pull request #1190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1190#discussion_r456203522
##
File path: hadoop-hdds/docs/content/security/SecurityAcls.zh.md
##
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+title: "Ozone 访问控制列表"
+date: "2019-April-03"
+weight:
ChenSammi commented on a change in pull request #1185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1185#discussion_r456200241
##
File path:
hadoop-hdds/container-service/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/container/common/statemachine/StateContext.java
##
@@ -415,7
runzhiwang commented on a change in pull request #1185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1185#discussion_r456195255
##
File path:
hadoop-hdds/container-service/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/container/common/statemachine/StateContext.java
##
@@ -415,7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sammi Chen updated HDDS-3946:
-
Target Version/s: 0.7.0 (was: 0.6.0)
> s3g multi-upload failed with partName check
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159636#comment-17159636
]
runzhiwang edited comment on HDDS-3952 at 7/17/20, 3:02 AM:
[~msingh] Hi,
maobaolong commented on pull request #1033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1033#issuecomment-659808668
@leosunli After you are ready for review, please use `/ready` to restore
this PR.
This is an automated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159636#comment-17159636
]
runzhiwang edited comment on HDDS-3952 at 7/17/20, 3:01 AM:
[~msingh] Hi,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159636#comment-17159636
]
runzhiwang edited comment on HDDS-3952 at 7/17/20, 3:00 AM:
[~msingh] Hi,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159636#comment-17159636
]
runzhiwang commented on HDDS-3952:
--
[~msingh] Hi, Thanks for review. The backgroud of this jira is our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
runzhiwang updated HDDS-3952:
-
Attachment: screenshot-1.png
> Make container could be reopened
>
>
>
rakeshadr commented on pull request #1164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1164#issuecomment-659786368
Thanks @xiaoyuyao and @bharatviswa504 for the reviews and committing the PR.
This is an automated
xiaoyuyao commented on pull request #1149:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1149#issuecomment-659766847
I agree with @elek that the scope of this change is very limited to where
client only has one om service id configured. So accidentally access wrong om
cluster when
xiaoyuyao commented on a change in pull request #1190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1190#discussion_r456156802
##
File path: hadoop-hdds/docs/content/security/SecurityAcls.zh.md
##
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+title: "Ozone 访问控制列表"
+date: "2019-April-03"
+weight:
xiaoyuyao commented on a change in pull request #1190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1190#discussion_r456156398
##
File path: hadoop-hdds/docs/content/security/SecurityAcls.zh.md
##
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+title: "Ozone 访问控制列表"
+date: "2019-April-03"
+weight:
xiaoyuyao commented on a change in pull request #1185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1185#discussion_r456153310
##
File path:
hadoop-hdds/container-service/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/container/common/statemachine/StateContext.java
##
@@ -415,7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated HDDS-3969:
-
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Validate KeyNames created in FileSystem requests.
>
bharatviswa504 opened a new pull request #1211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1211
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This Jira is to validate KeyNames which are created with OzoneFileSystem.
Similar to how hdfs handles using DFSUtil.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bharat Viswanadham updated HDDS-3969:
-
Summary: Validate KeyNames created in FileSystem requests. (was: Validate
KeyNames
bharatviswa504 edited a comment on pull request #1196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1196#issuecomment-659696446
Thank You @arp7 and @avijayanhwx for the review.
I have addressed review comments.
This PR only modifies behavior of KeyCreate when
bharatviswa504 edited a comment on pull request #1196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1196#issuecomment-659696446
Thank You @arp7 and @avijayanhwx for the review.
I have addressed review comments.
This PR only handles KeyCreate when
bharatviswa504 edited a comment on pull request #1196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1196#issuecomment-659696446
Thank You @arp7 and @avijayanhwx for the review.
I have addressed review comments.
This PR only modifies behavior of KeyCreate when
bharatviswa504 commented on pull request #1196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1196#issuecomment-659696446
Thank You @arp7 and @avijayanhwx for the review.
I have addressed review comments.
This is an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aravindan Vijayan resolved HDDS-3924.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Move away from proto serialization for RocksDB keys in Ozone
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159496#comment-17159496
]
Aravindan Vijayan commented on HDDS-3924:
-
Thank you [~pifta], [~ppogde] & [~xyao]. Closing this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiaoyu Yao resolved HDDS-3926.
--
Fix Version/s: 0.6.0
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks [~ppogde] for the contribution and all for the
xiaoyuyao merged pull request #1182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1182
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiaoyu Yao resolved HDDS-3824.
--
Fix Version/s: 0.7.0
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks [~rakeshr] for the contribution and all for the
xiaoyuyao merged pull request #1164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1164
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ethan Rose updated HDDS-3976:
-
Description:
HDDS-3854 fixed a bug in KeyValueBlockIterator#hasNext, but introduced another
one in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ethan Rose updated HDDS-3976:
-
Description:
HDDS-3854 fixed a bug in KeyValueBlockIterator#hasNext, but introduced another
one in
Ethan Rose created HDDS-3976:
Summary: KeyValueBlockIterator#nextBlock skips valid blocks
Key: HDDS-3976
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3976
Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
avijayanhwx removed a comment on pull request #1210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1210#issuecomment-659593212
First Restart with HDDS-3925.
`2020-07-16 18:22:21,133 [main] INFO pipeline.SCMPipelineManager: Processing
pipeline
avijayanhwx commented on pull request #1210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1210#issuecomment-659593212
First Restart with HDDS-3925.
`2020-07-16 18:22:21,133 [main] INFO pipeline.SCMPipelineManager: Processing
pipeline PipelineID=096c944b-07d9-4a5b-af11-1102b46cf457
avijayanhwx opened a new pull request #1210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1210
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
After the patch from HDDS-3925, SCM failed to start up for duplicated
pipeline detected.
## What is the link to the Apache JIRA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated HDDS-3965:
-
Labels: pull-request-available upgrade-p0 (was: upgrade-p0)
> SCM failed to start up for
prashantpogde commented on pull request #1182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1182#issuecomment-659580090
Made the changes as suggested by @xiaoyuyao .
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
prashantpogde commented on a change in pull request #1182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1182#discussion_r455974965
##
File path:
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/codec/TokenIdentifierCodec.java
##
@@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ public
bharatviswa504 commented on a change in pull request #1196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1196#discussion_r455968767
##
File path:
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/request/file/OMFileRequest.java
##
@@ -79,15 +79,11 @@
bharatviswa504 commented on a change in pull request #1196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1196#discussion_r455968524
##
File path:
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/request/file/OMFileRequest.java
##
@@ -79,15 +79,11 @@
arp7 commented on a change in pull request #1196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1196#discussion_r455961310
##
File path:
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/request/file/OMFileRequest.java
##
@@ -79,15 +79,11 @@ public static
arp7 commented on a change in pull request #1196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1196#discussion_r455960385
##
File path:
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/request/file/OMFileRequest.java
##
@@ -79,15 +79,11 @@ public static
arp7 commented on a change in pull request #1196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1196#discussion_r455955940
##
File path:
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/request/OMClientRequest.java
##
@@ -265,4 +272,30 @@ public
arp7 commented on a change in pull request #1129:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1129#discussion_r455950095
##
File path:
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/OzoneManager.java
##
@@ -3041,58 +3047,74 @@ public TermIndex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Siddharth Wagle reassigned HDDS-3965:
-
Assignee: Aravindan Vijayan (was: Prashant Pogde)
[~avijayan] Can you take this up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated HDDS-3877:
-
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Do not fail CI check for log upload failure
>
adoroszlai opened a new pull request #1209:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1209
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Consider CI successful even if `upload-artifact` step fails, to save time
and resources.
Examples where this happened:
adoroszlai commented on pull request #1204:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1204#issuecomment-659519673
> > I was considering changing the parameter to `Duration`
> yeah...that seems like a better approach.
Created HDDS-3975 for this.
adoroszlai commented on pull request #1104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1104#issuecomment-659518247
> I take back this comment. This feature helps to expose buckets created via
shell/ofs to S3. So making it configurable is not needed. (As by default if
user decides to
adoroszlai commented on pull request #1104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1104#issuecomment-659517803
> I have one suggestion, can we make this mount configurable option, as this
is required only when old S3 buckets needs to be exposed via O3fs/ofs. In this
way, we can
bharatviswa504 commented on pull request #1104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1104#issuecomment-659515813
> I have one suggestion, can we make this mount configurable option, as this
is required only when old S3 buckets needs to be exposed via O3fs/ofs. In this
way, we
bharatviswa504 commented on pull request #1104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1104#issuecomment-659503325
I have one suggestion, can we make this mount configurable option, as this
is required only when old S3 buckets needs to be exposed via O3fs/ofs. In this
way, we
bharatviswa504 commented on pull request #1104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1104#issuecomment-659501553
> > > > When deleting a bucket, we check bucket is empty or not. Do we need
to check resolvedBucket is empty or not?
> > >
> > >
> > > Link can be deleted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159256#comment-17159256
]
Stephen O'Donnell commented on HDDS-698:
[~Sammi] I think we can close this overall Jira now. Any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159255#comment-17159255
]
Stephen O'Donnell commented on HDDS-1930:
-
I believe this is not an issue, or no longer an issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stephen O'Donnell resolved HDDS-1930.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
> Test Topology Aware Job scheduling with Ozone Topology
>
Attila Doroszlai created HDDS-3975:
--
Summary: Use Duration for time in RatisClientConfig
Key: HDDS-3975
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3975
Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17159235#comment-17159235
]
Sammi Chen commented on HDDS-3907:
--
[~elek], do you think we should fix this in 0.6.0?
> Topology
elek commented on pull request #1208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1208#issuecomment-659404852
> Would you like to merge apache#920 to make it possible to accept any
number of replication which specified by StorageClass or rebase that works to
this storageClass POC?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated HDDS-3755:
-
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Storage-class support for Ozone
>
elek opened a new pull request #1208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1208
Created together with @maobaolong (thanks the help)
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is the initial draft for storage-class support. It introduces the
lokeshj1703 commented on pull request #1204:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1204#issuecomment-659388287
> I was considering changing the parameter to `Duration`, similar to
>
>
elek commented on a change in pull request #1207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1207#discussion_r455754639
##
File path: hadoop-hdds/docs/content/design/decommissioning.md
##
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ title: Decommissioning in Ozone
summary: Formal process to shut
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/917
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/917#issuecomment-659381579
Thank you very much for the patch. I am closing this PR __temporarily__ as
there was no
activity recently and it is waiting for response from its author.
elek commented on pull request #917:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/917#issuecomment-659381363
/close
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
adoroszlai commented on pull request #1204:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1204#issuecomment-659376896
Thanks @lokeshj1703 for the review.
> Minor comment - We can add suffix like "InMs" for time based configs in
classes like RatisClientConfig.
> We can do it as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Attila Doroszlai updated HDDS-3964:
---
Target Version/s: 0.6.0 (was: 0.7.0)
> Ratis config key mismatch
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Attila Doroszlai updated HDDS-3964:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: In Progress)
> Ratis config key mismatch
>
adoroszlai commented on pull request #1142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1142#issuecomment-659356744
> Overall it looks good to me, and really impressive approach. I have a few
comments -- none of them are blocker, but i like to discuss technical details...
Glen Geng created HDDS-3974:
---
Summary: StateContext::addPipelineActionIfAbsent does not work as
expected.
Key: HDDS-3974
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3974
Project: Hadoop Distributed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marton Elek resolved HDDS-3807.
---
Fix Version/s: 0.6.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Propagate raft log disks info to SCM from datanode
>
elek merged pull request #1107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1107
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
elek commented on pull request #1107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1107#issuecomment-659327881
Merging it as checkstyle issues are fixed. Thanks @bshashikant the
contribution.
This is an automated
elek edited a comment on pull request #1107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1107#issuecomment-651678810
Checkstyle violation seems to be related.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sammi Chen updated HDDS-3967:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.7.0)
0.6.0
> Remove leftover debug setting
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sammi Chen resolved HDDS-3968.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> LDB scan fails to read from transactionInfoTable
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sammi Chen updated HDDS-3968:
-
Fix Version/s: 0.6.0
> LDB scan fails to read from transactionInfoTable
>
elek commented on pull request #983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/983#issuecomment-659297817
/pending more discussion is requested by @arp7
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
elek commented on pull request #1028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1028#issuecomment-659297555
> @elek I think this case can not be avoided by only add read lock
Agree. It seems to be necessary. But it means that we can't remove the lock
in the ContainerStateMap
ChenSammi commented on pull request #1207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1207#issuecomment-659293549
@nandakumar131 Could you take a look at this JIRA, make sure I have your
name correctly spelled.
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated HDDS-3973:
-
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Update main feature design status
>
ChenSammi opened a new pull request #1207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1207
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3973
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
Sammi Chen created HDDS-3973:
Summary: Update main feature design status
Key: HDDS-3973
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3973
Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-3972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated HDDS-3972:
-
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Add option to limit number of items while displaying
sadanand48 opened a new pull request #1206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1206
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The change here is to add an option to the ldb tool scan command to limit
number of displayed items.
## What is the link to the
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
