Any one knows a better / cleaner way to do this than:
http://silverlight.net/forums/t/12437.aspx
http://silverlight.net/forums/t/72631.aspx
I have already dumped daisy-chaining of calls in favor of multiple async
calls with a boolean flag for each.
After calling all the async operations, I am
I had a quick look at this the other day and when I compiled up the reactive
dll, the classes were different that in the example:
ObservableExtensions
.DoAsync
Didn't exist?
I didn't really examine where I was going wrong in any great depth, so If you
have any success I'd be interested
Ali is going to give a talk on the Rx framework at the next SDDN Event in
Sydney :)
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Jordan Knight jordan.kni...@readify.netwrote:
I had a quick look at this the other day and when I compiled up the
reactive dll, the classes were different that in the example:
Attached is a brief example on how to do this using the WaitHandle in the
IAsyncResult returned by each async method.
The code is simple. In Silverlight I just do 10 service call that will add
an item to a ListBox. I'll wait until all the service calls end to add
another message to the list (this
Asheesh,
I'm comparing the different approaches, the one in StackOverFlow works well,
this is what I don't like:
* I think it's hard to work with multiple services using events instead of
callbacks (as in my example),
* They're using an AutoResetEvent, which we get for free if we use the
Ross,
You're totally right, altough isn't as fun, that'll definitely perfom better
and should be the first option. I let myself go straight to VS to hack some
code and completely overlooked this.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Ross Jempson
ross.jemp...@michaelhill.com.au wrote:
Whilst
Thanks Miguel, Jake and others.
You are right... I forgot to use BackgroundWorker... :p
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Miguel Madero m...@miguelmadero.com wrote:
Asheesh,
I'm comparing the different approaches, the one in StackOverFlow works
well, this is what I don't like:
* I think
