The idea behind unique vs. non-unique is best illustrated by example.
Take a CLUSTERIP resource...
Based on some criteria (usually the source address), it allocates all
requests into a bucket from 0..(N-1), where N ::= clone-max
So when we ask is the resource running here, we're really asking:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Bob Haxo bh...@sgi.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I'd say you removed no-quorum-policy=ignore
Actually, the pair of no_quorum_policy and no-quorum-policy are set to
ignore, and expected-quorum-votes is set to 2:
crm_config
cluster_property_set
Hi, Florian:
I don't think that suggestion appeals to me. :-)
Any idea how much work it is to change the OCF RA to reliably support
master_max=2?
Regards,
Nick
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Florian Haas flor...@linbit.com wrote:
On 05/21/2009 11:12 PM, Nicholas Dronen wrote:
Hi:
Well, I'm still not sure what the state of OpenAIS/CoroSync is, but seem to
encounter only more problems the farther I dig in to it.
This is quite unsurprising.
The CoroSync API has changed almost daily for the last few months.
If you really want to use CoroSync, I'd suggest
Karl,
we are closing in on the final days of openais and corosync versions
1.0.
Regards
-steve
So? When will we see some stable, well-documented configurations that aren't
supported and tested by only one specific vendor?
-K
---
Karl Katzke
Systems Analyst II
TAMU - DRGS
And you'll also want this patch for the crmd
diff -r 4619c842d58c crmd/callbacks.c
--- a/crmd/callbacks.c Fri May 22 16:52:14 2009 +0200
+++ b/crmd/callbacks.c Fri May 22 21:34:12 2009 +0200
@@ -179,7 +179,6 @@ crmd_ha_msg_callback(HA_Message *hamsg,
} else {
Hello,
I am trying to get my config working, but have gone down the wrong
path. Unfortunately, I can't erase my config and start over. I try
cibadmin -E --force, which seems to work for about 10 seconds. cibadmin
-Q shows a minimal config with just my nodes, but then it jumps right
back
