Re,
Any chance you could download the latest tarball and try that?
http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/archive/1aa7cf1450e4.tar.bz2
Awesome! No more orphans ! \o/
Almost actually :(
I've just had 2 orphans (tom-DNS:2,tom-DNS:3) for a clone containing 2
groups (tom-DNS:0, to
Hi Andrew
Any chance you could download the latest tarball and try that?
http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/archive/1aa7cf1450e4.tar.bz2
Awesome! No more orphans ! \o/
Everything is working now, it's clean and tidy.
*But* ... there is a small regression in the crm tool. When I
Hi Andrew,
By the method that you showed, the problem was solved.
Thank you.
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
> > > You would be better off with a constraint like example 9.3 which will
> > > exclude any unconnected node and leave
Hi,
I have a very simple master/slave in two node cluster. The crm_attribute
failed to master score because find_nvpair_attr() found multiple matches.
But I think that's not possible, there should be always one entry for master
score for each node. I just had one failure today. The log is below. I
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
> > You would be better off with a constraint like example 9.3 which will
> > exclude any unconnected node and leave the previous location scores
> > unchanged:
> >
> > \xA0
>
\xA0http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.0/html/Pacemaker_Explained/ch09s03
Everything is working fine now.. Thanks for every one who helped :)
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Angie T. Muhammad
wrote:
> well, I am not sure if what I did is right or not, but:
>
>
> # vim /etc/ha.d/ha.cf
> crm on
>
> // now crm_mon displays things as usual !!
> # crm_mon -i5
>
> =
well, I am not sure if what I did is right or not, but:
# vim /etc/ha.d/ha.cf
crm on
// now crm_mon displays things as usual !!
# crm_mon -i5
Last updated: Wed Jan 6 00:49:04 2010
Stack: Heartbeat
Current DC: node2.mydomain.com (8e8ca99f-ff34-45c7-814b-d73d69889441) -
partition wit
Hello,
Thank you for the prompt reply.
All permissions are correct, and here is the output of ulimit:
# cd /var/lib/heartbeat/cores/
# ulimit -a
core file size (blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
scheduling priority (-e) 0
file size (blo
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:47:46PM +0200, Angie T. Muhammad wrote:
> mmm, I truncated the logs to re-genrate the error and send you the file, but
> the error no longer appears at /var/log/messages now. There were the words
> "kernel" and "segfault" on the last line !!!
Did you enabled coredum
I'm running on CentOS 5.3
using kernel 2.6.18-128.el5
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Angie T. Muhammad wrote:
> mmm, I truncated the logs to re-genrate the error and send you the file,
> but the error no longer appears at /var/log/messages now. There were the
> words "kernel" and "segfa
mmm, I truncated the logs to re-genrate the error and send you the file, but
the error no longer appears at /var/log/messages now. There were the words
"kernel" and "segfault" on the last line !!!
Any way, I'll try to regenerate the error at /var/log/messages and send it.
Till then, would you plea
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:19:16PM +0200, Angie T. Muhammad wrote:
> Hello all
>
> Thank you Dejan and Dr. Schwartzkopff
> But please bear with me because I'm still suffering a problem. Here is what
> I did:
>
> # wget -O /etc/yum.repos.d/clusterlabs.repo
> http://clusterlabs.org/rpm/epel-5
Thank you Lars.
-Frank
> -Original Message-
> From: Lars Ellenberg [mailto:lars.ellenb...@linbit.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:21 AM
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] multistate resource warning
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:20:53AM -0500, Frank
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 09:20:53AM -0500, Frank DiMeo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I've got a simple multistate resource running on a two node cluster.
> The enclosed configuration is happy accepted by the CIB, and I see the
> resource running in the master/slave state on the two nodes, but when
>
Hi All,
I've got a simple multistate resource running on a two node cluster. The
enclosed configuration is happy accepted by the CIB, and I see the resource
running in the master/slave state on the two nodes, but when I run a
crm_verify, I get a warning:
cibadmin -replace --xml-file 1rs
Am Dienstag, 5. Januar 2010 13:00:44 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:51:38PM +0200, Angie T. Muhammad wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > Hope you spent good time on holidays!
> >
> > Our data center does not support multicast and I have been googling
> > "unicast site:openais
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 01:51:38PM +0200, Angie T. Muhammad wrote:
> Hello all,
> Hope you spent good time on holidays!
>
> Our data center does not support multicast and I have been googling "unicast
> site:openais.org" but now results.
> And changing our data center is not an option at the
Hello all,
Hope you spent good time on holidays!
Our data center does not support multicast and I have been googling "unicast
site:openais.org" but now results.
And changing our data center is not an option at the moment.
I wonder does any beta version of openais support unicast?
If not, do you h
Minor correction to the reply
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> 2009/12/22 :
>> Hi,
>>
>> We constituted the complicated cluster of three nodes.(2ACT+1STB)
>>
>> We built a cluster by the next combination.
>>
>> * corosync-1.1.2
>> * Reusable-Cluster-Components-fa44a169d
2009/12/22 :
> Hi,
>
> We constituted the complicated cluster of three nodes.(2ACT+1STB)
>
> We built a cluster by the next combination.
>
> * corosync-1.1.2
> * Reusable-Cluster-Components-fa44a169d55f
> * Cluster-Resource-Agents-6f02f8ad7fd4
> * Pacemaker-1-0-d990c453b999
>
> The resource of
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Thomas Guthmann wrote:
> Re,
>
>> So cloned groups are not fun and side effects are random :) I will do
>> more tests without IPAddr2 which seems a bit fancy and dodgy.
>
> I've just tried to clone a group tom-TEST containing 2 simple primitives
> (ocf:homemade:name
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Javen Wu wrote:
> Thanks Beekhof for answering my question.
> I don't mean it matters. I just feel confuse why the function seems
> redundant when I tried to understand the code of pacemaker ;)
>
> I understand the CIB should be workable without CRMD around. But is
22 matches
Mail list logo
