Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-level ACLs for the CIB

2010-03-19 Thread Yan Gao
On 03/19/10 06:22, Lars Ellenberg wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:12:24PM +0800, Yan Gao wrote: After investigating, I found that Unix domain sockets provide methods to identify the user on the other side of a socket. That means we don't need PAM to do authentication for local access, and

Re: [Pacemaker] logd and corosync/pacemaker

2010-03-19 Thread Andreas Mock
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm Gesendet: 15.03.2010 11:01:03 An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] logd and corosync/pacemaker Hi, On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:24:53PM +0100, Andreas Mock wrote: Hi all, with heartbeat it was

[Pacemaker] DRBD Management Console 0.7.0

2010-03-19 Thread Rasto Levrinc
Hi, This is the next DRBD-MC beta release 0.7.0. DRBD-MC, that is also a Pacemaker GUI, is a Java application that helps to configure DRBD/Pacemaker/Corosync/Heartbeat clusters. It is compatible with Heartbeat 2.1.3 to the Pacemaker 1.0.8 with both available communication layers and DRBD 8.

[Pacemaker] Packaging error in cluster-glue

2010-03-19 Thread Andreas Mock
Hi all, I don't know who feels responsible for that, but I found the following: My external stonith script ibmrsa-telnet was enhanced in several ways which is great. I take the chance to thank all contributors. One of the enhancements was a change in logging. From the beginning there was a way

Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout

2010-03-19 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:52:24PM +0100, Andreas Mock wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@multinet.de Gesendet: 18.03.2010 21:32:22 An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout Hi, new

Re: [Pacemaker] Problem : Sometimes failed in the start of the guest(on KVM).

2010-03-19 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Hideo-san, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:46:12AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi, I use VirtualDomain-RA and, on KVM, constitute a cluster. However, a guest sometimes fails in start. Mar 16 15:16:52 x3650e lrmd: [13457]: info: RA output: (guest-kvm1:start:stderr) error:

Re: [Pacemaker] logd and corosync/pacemaker

2010-03-19 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:34:27AM +0100, Andreas Mock wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm Gesendet: 15.03.2010 11:01:03 An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] logd and corosync/pacemaker Hi, On Fri, Mar 12, 2010

Re: [Pacemaker] Problem : Sometimes failed in the start of the guest(on KVM).

2010-03-19 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Dejan, IIRC, that port has to do with vnc and something else (another VNC server?) has already been started on that port. Thank you for comment. I examine it a little more. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote: Hi Hideo-san, On Fri, Mar 19,

Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout

2010-03-19 Thread Ken Dechick
Hi all, Thanks for the responses. I actaully had it figured out a few minutes after I posted - doh! I just added: 'op start timeout=XXs op stop timeout=XXs' for the 3 primitives that were giving this warning - obviously using the suggested defaults for each. In the case of DRBD I simply had to

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] Medium: build: require Net-SNMP 5.3 or later

2010-03-19 Thread Florian Haas
On 03/18/2010 10:02 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote: Hi, On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: Andrew, now that Pacemaker has been on a bi-monthly release schedule for a while, is there any

Re: [Pacemaker] node states

2010-03-19 Thread Florian Haas
On 03/17/2010 09:30 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 07:16:16AM -0500, Schaefer, Diane E wrote: We were wondering what the node state of UNCLEAN, with the three variations of online, offline and

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] Medium: build: require Net-SNMP 5.3 or later

2010-03-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com wrote: On 03/18/2010 10:02 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote: Hi, On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 09:17:38AM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: Andrew, now that

Re: [Pacemaker] WARNING: drbd0: default-action-timeout

2010-03-19 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:24:16AM -0400, Ken Dechick wrote: Hi all, Thanks for the responses. I actaully had it figured out a few minutes after I posted - doh! I just added: 'op start timeout=XXs op stop timeout=XXs' for the 3 primitives that were giving this warning - obviously

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] Medium: build: require Net-SNMP 5.3 or later

2010-03-19 Thread Florian Haas
On 03/19/2010 03:39 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: Who said you should build RC _packages_? Tag an RC, upload a tarball, announce on mailing list, done. How is that extra work? No wait, Pacemaker builds directly from a Mercurial tarball. So scratch the upload part. What does the tag achieve

[Pacemaker] Building an active/passive dhcp server

2010-03-19 Thread Emmanuel Lesouef
Hello, I'm trying to make a active/passive dhcp server. Currently, it works with the following setup : * 2 debian servers with pacemaker : node1 with physical ip1 and virtual ip vip1 (managed with pacemaker) node2 with physical ip2. * 1 lsb dhcp3-server resource that is on node1 and migrates

Re: [Pacemaker] Building an active/passive dhcp server

2010-03-19 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:47:59PM +0100, Emmanuel Lesouef wrote: I'm trying to make a active/passive dhcp server. [...] The problem is that when node1 come online again, there's a difference in the dhcp lease file. I think that using rsync to synchronize the lease file is not the best