On 26.04.2010 16:37, Oliver Heinz wrote:
Still segfaults.
Urgh... I can not reproduce this. I'm using virtualized 64bit KVM
machines with ppa:ubuntu-ha/lucid-cluster and I get no segfaults. Your
cib is almost identical as mine (I have no IP failover, but I do have drbd).
Could you add
Hi Andrew,
Done.
http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/rev/f7da9d09ebd2
It seems to move with your patch definitely.
But, the following error is reflected on log.
Does not this error have any problem?
Apr 27 16:37:00 srv01 pengine: [5839]: ERROR: native_merge_weights:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:38:21AM -0400, daniel qian wrote:
On 2010-04-26, at 3:11 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:13:31PM -0400, daniel qian wrote:
On 2010-04-23, at 12:04 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at
On 27.04.2010 09:41, Oliver Heinz wrote:
Pål Simensen reported that he has the same segfault error, so it would be
interessting if the new packages fixed it for him. Did they?
What's your network setup? Do you use bonding or dhcp?
___
Pacemaker
On 27.04.2010 12:58, Oliver Heinz wrote:
I use bonding, vlans and bridge interfaces. No dhcp just fixed adresses.
As a workaround, you could:
sudo update-rc.d -f corosync disable S
add 'post-up /etc/init.d/corosync start' to bonding interface in
/etc/network/interfaces.
Hi all,
I need an idea how I could achieve the following with corosync/pacemaker.
2 servers in a cluster. Each server is running a resource on its own by
pacemaker
configuration in the default case (everything o.k.). In this scenario the
resources
shall take as much server estate as possible.
Am Dienstag, 27. April 2010 14:45:21 schrieb Andreas Mock:
Hi all,
I need an idea how I could achieve the following with corosync/pacemaker.
2 servers in a cluster. Each server is running a resource on its own by
pacemaker configuration in the default case (everything o.k.). In this
scenario
Am Dienstag, 27. April 2010 13:01:36 schrieb Ante Karamatić:
On 27.04.2010 12:58, Oliver Heinz wrote:
I use bonding, vlans and bridge interfaces. No dhcp just fixed adresses.
Other two people with this issue also use bonding and after disabling
bonding issue was gone. Could you please
On 4/27/2010 3:26 PM, Oliver Heinz wrote:
Am Dienstag, 27. April 2010 13:01:36 schrieb Ante Karamatić:
On 27.04.2010 12:58, Oliver Heinz wrote:
I use bonding, vlans and bridge interfaces. No dhcp just fixed adresses.
Other two people with this issue also use bonding and after disabling
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@multinet.de
Gesendet: 27.04.2010 14:51:58
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Need an idea for dynamic configuration dependng on
resource distribution
Am Dienstag, 27.
Am Dienstag, 27. April 2010 14:18:27 schrieb Ante Karamatić:
On 27.04.2010 12:58, Oliver Heinz wrote:
I use bonding, vlans and bridge interfaces. No dhcp just fixed adresses.
As a workaround, you could:
sudo update-rc.d -f corosync disable S
add 'post-up /etc/init.d/corosync start' to
Am Dienstag, 27. April 2010 13:00:27 schrieb Lars Ellenberg:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:33:27AM +0200, Oliver Heinz wrote:
..
I installed every -dbg package that is available for any package
installed on the system (just to be sure). There are no debug packages
for most of the
Hi all!
I had a working two-node-drbd-cluster with the following config. (Ubuntu
10.04 Server amd64, upgraded today)
node $id=05570095-f264-41ae-a609-768fd4a3b7e8 store2
node $id=e790fa15-1f91-4442-94e9-bf411519c4f8 store1
primitive drbd0 ocf:linbit:drbd \
params drbd_resource=raid \
Greetings,
I've discovered that if I have ocf::hb:Xen resources as primitives, they
migrate to other nodes on failover.
But if they are members of a group, the domUs stop/start. Am I doing it
wrong? I'd like to use the groups to minimize the amount of config I
need for each VM.
Here's my
On 27.04.2010 15:26, Oliver Heinz wrote:
bad news is: it's not only bonding related
It's not bonding at all. It's an upstart issue. corosync is started
before all network interfaces are up. This issue is most visible with
bridging, cause bridged interfaces become functional much later than
Suggested patch:
diff --git a/group/dlm_controld/pacemaker.c b/group/dlm_controld/pacemaker.c
index c661343..93c1841 100644
--- a/group/dlm_controld/pacemaker.c
+++ b/group/dlm_controld/pacemaker.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ void dlm_process_node(gpointer key, gpointer
value, gpointer user_data)
}
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Michael Brown mich...@netdirect.ca wrote:
Greetings,
I've discovered that if I have ocf::hb:Xen resources as primitives, they
migrate to other nodes on failover.
But if they are members of a group, the domUs stop/start. Am I doing it
wrong?
No. The
Hello,
this mean that if i create a group with a file system + xen the live
migration doen't work?
Regards,
Roberto.
On 04/27/2010 08:41 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Michael Brownmich...@netdirect.ca wrote:
Greetings,
I've discovered that if I have
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Oliver Hoffmann o...@dom.de wrote:
Hi all!
I had a working two-node-drbd-cluster with the following config. (Ubuntu
10.04 Server amd64, upgraded today)
node $id=05570095-f264-41ae-a609-768fd4a3b7e8 store2
node $id=e790fa15-1f91-4442-94e9-bf411519c4f8 store1
2010/4/26 Aleksey Zholdak alek...@zholdak.com:
Andrew Beekhof:
What do you mean here? Need logs? I am pleased to show you! Only their size
will occupy much space here, tell me what to choose and what to look ...
Better to just send everything and compress them first.
Is there A Better Way to do this, or is the best approach to colocate
each domU with the group?
M.
On 04/27/2010 02:41 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Michael Brown mich...@netdirect.ca wrote:
Greetings,
I've discovered that if I have ocf::hb:Xen resources as
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Michael Brown mich...@netdirect.ca wrote:
Is there A Better Way to do this, or is the best approach to colocate
each domU with the group?
In order for the domU to migrate, everything it needs must be on the
current host AND already at the destination.
ONLY
Hi Andrew,
probably ther is my mistake.
I'd like to add a second file system mounted on the guest xen, this file
system is not the main files sytem where run the O.S., but is a file
system that use the xen machine for file sharing for example.
Is it not possible?
Regards,
Roberto
On
Andrew,
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 21:09 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Roberto Giordani r.giord...@libero.it
wrote:
Hello,
this mean that if i create a group with a file system + xen the live
migration doen't work?
Correct.
You'd need to use a cluster
I've written a custom plugin to monitor RAID status and it's working
great. Except for some reason, pacemaker seems to stop dispatching checks:
xenhost1:~ # grep RaidStatus /var/log/messages | tail -n4
Apr 27 15:38:14 xenhost1 RaidStatus[25972]: [25977]: INFO: status optimal
Apr 27 15:38:44
On 04/27/2010 10:20 PM, Michael Brown wrote:
I've written a custom plugin to monitor RAID status and it's working
great. Except for some reason, pacemaker seems to stop dispatching checks:
[...]
Any idea what's happening?
Without seeing the resource agent? Unlikely.
Version information
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 04:20:16PM -0400, Michael Brown wrote:
I've written a custom plugin to monitor RAID status and it's working
great. Except for some reason, pacemaker seems to stop dispatching checks:
xenhost1:~ # grep RaidStatus /var/log/messages | tail -n4
Apr 27 15:38:14
Hi Andrew,
Oh, that was some development logging I forgot to remove.
I'll backport that fix in a moment too.
All right.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:42 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
28 matches
Mail list logo
