On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
I don't know if it is the same bug...
In the sense that in your bug case the problem is related to:
- the stop operation not enforcing the order constraint
- the constraint is between a clone of a group and a clone
On 2010-05-20T09:55:40, patrik.rappo...@knapp.com wrote:
possibly this behaviour is based on my configuration. could you please give
me an advice how to realize this?
Upgrade.
And configure stonith.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX
On 2010-05-26T10:26:35, daniel qian dan...@bestningning.com wrote:
I followed this link to setup a two-node cluster on Ubuntu 10.4 -
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/LucidTesting#Pacemaker,%20drbd8%20and%20OCFS2%20or%20GFS2
Everything is working fine except for running MySQL on both
Hello everybody,
I've pushed an update to the Linux-HA User's Guide to
http://www.linux-ha.org/doc.
The relevant changes since 0.9.1 are in the section on upgrades from
Heartbeat 2.1 to Heartbeat 3 with Pacemaker, starting at:
http://www.linux-ha.org/doc/s-upgrade-crm.html
As always, PDF
On 2010-05-28 14:01, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
Hi,
I want to convert our home-made application to be managed by pacemaker
cluster.
The way it works now: application starts, discovers all IPs configured on the
system and if it sees preconfigured IP it becomes master and will serve
On May 28, 2010, at 8:12 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
On 2010-05-28 14:01, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
Hi,
I want to convert our home-made application to be managed by pacemaker
cluster.
The way it works now: application starts, discovers all IPs configured on
the system and if it sees
On 2010-05-28 14:20, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On May 28, 2010, at 8:12 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
On 2010-05-28 14:01, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
Hi,
I want to convert our home-made application to be managed by pacemaker
cluster.
The way it works now: application starts, discovers all IPs
On May 28, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
Imperative word was started. You think I still should go multi-state RA
for this application?
If the application which that RA applies to distinguishes between roles
equivalent to a Master and a Slave, and you want the RA to manage those,
Hello,
I tried this approach and it seems to work ootb.
But I would like to know if there could be silent drawbacks or potential
problems from a technical point of view.
Under /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/ I create a directory named myocfdir and
inside it I put a copy of an existing RA (eg apache)
On 05/28/2010 02:37 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On May 28, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
Imperative word was started. You think I still should go multi-state RA
for this application?
If the application which that RA applies to distinguishes between roles
equivalent to a Master and a
On May 28, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
On 05/28/2010 02:37 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On May 28, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
Imperative word was started. You think I still should go multi-state RA
for this application?
If the application which that RA applies to
On 2010-05-26, at 2:26 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2010-05-26T10:26:35, daniel qian dan...@bestningning.com wrote:
I followed this link to setup a two-node cluster on Ubuntu 10.4 -
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ClusterStack/LucidTesting#Pacemaker,%20drbd8%20and%20OCFS2%20or%20GFS2
So, application acts as master if it was able to bind to the pre-configured
IP and as a node if it wasn't. If it's a master it listens on an additional
port and receives updates from nodes. Each application pulls video feed out
of attached video cameras and stores them on the local drives,
13 matches
Mail list logo
