Just bring up the cluster with the new names and use crm configure
node delete to remove the old names.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Karl Rößmann k.roessm...@fkf.mpg.de wrote:
Hi Clusterlabs mailing list,
I have a running cluster with three nodes.
For some reason I had to change all host
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:01 PM, hudan studiawan studia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to start to contribute to Pacemaker project. I start to read
Documentation and try some basic configurations. I have a question: what
kind of algorithm used by Pacemaker to choose another node when a node
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Shravan Mishra shravan.mis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just a quick question, who generates the very first cib.xml when
pacemaker processes are initialized?
The cib
Thanks
Shravan
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:40 PM, holger.teut...@fresenius-netcare.com wrote:
Hi,
I observed the following in pacemaker Versions 1.1.3 and tip up to patch
10258.
In a small test environment to study fail-count behavior I have one resource
anything
doing sleep 600 with monitoring interval 10
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It seams that it happens every time PE wants to check the conf
09:23:55 crmd: [3473]: info: crm_timer_popped: PEngine Recheck Timer
(I_PE_CALC) just popped!
and then check_rsc_parameters() wants to reset my
Hi Andrew,
I registered these contents with Bugzilla as enhancement of the functions.
* http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2501
Thanks,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
Is the change of this attrd and
Dejan: looks like something in the lrm library.
Any idea why the message doesn't contain lrm_opstatus?
lrm_targetrc also looks strange.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Ron Kerry rke...@sgi.com wrote:
Folks -
I am seeing the following message sequence that results in a bogus
declaration of
On Monday 04 October 2010 15:00:25 mathias.enzensber...@knapp.com wrote:
Hi all,
I use openais/pacemaker v.1.1.2 on SLES 11.1 and would like to use the
SNMP function of crm_mon.
But this part is documented really scanty (e.g. the part for configuring
SNMP notifications is blank).
I found
On 5 October 2010 11:15, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It seams that it happens every time PE wants to check the conf
09:23:55 crmd: [3473]: info: crm_timer_popped: PEngine Recheck Timer
Hi,
I am thinking to put under cluster control the sshd and I am checking if the
/etc/init.d/sshd supplied by RedHat 5.4 is compatible with LSB.
So, I run the test mentioned here [1] and it fails at test 6, it returns 1
and failed message.
Could this create problems within pacemaker?
Regards,
The resource failed when the sleep expired, i.e. each 600 secs.
Now I changed the resource to
sleep 7200, failure-timeout 3600
i.e. to values far beyond the recheck-interval opf 15m.
Now everything behaves as expected.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Holger Teutsch
From:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am thinking to put under cluster control the sshd and I am checking if the
/etc/init.d/sshd supplied by RedHat 5.4 is compatible with LSB.
So, I run the test mentioned here [1] and it fails at test 6, it
On 5 October 2010 13:19, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am thinking to put under cluster control the sshd and I am checking if
the
/etc/init.d/sshd supplied by RedHat 5.4 is compatible
05.10.2010 12:12, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
Hi all,
just wondering, is there a way to make resource depend on (be colocated
with) either of two other resources?
Not yet. Its something we want to support
Hi,
I was interested in knowing that if I have to choose between pacemaker
1.0 vs 1.1 which one should I use.
Thanks
Shravan
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home:
We are setup in a two node active/passive
cluster using pacemaker/corosync. We shutdown the pacemaker/corosync
on both nodes and changed the uname -n on our nodes to show the short name
instead of the FQDN. Started up pacemaker/corosync and ever since
we done that, when we run the crm_mon command,
Hello,
I have a 2 node cluster, running DRBD, heartbeat and pacemaker in
active/passive mode. On both nodes, eth0 is connected to the main
network, eth1 is used to connect the nodes directly to each other.
The nodes share a virtual IP address on eth0. Pacemaker is also
controlling a custom
17 matches
Mail list logo