Hi,
I've filed one issue to bugzilla. Please find the detail and the patch on it.
LF#2605 pingd misdetection of failure when kernel.pid_max > 65536
http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2605
Thanks,
--
Keisuke MORI
___
Pacemak
Hi All,
I registered this problem in Bugzilla.
* http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2604
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauch.
--- On Wed, 2011/6/15, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I found a problem with a trap of the SNMP.(from hbagent.)
>
> A trap of activ
Andrew does any chance to fix this behaivour??? Now this constraint doesn't
work:
location ms_drbd_web_slave_on_backup0 ms_drbd_web-U \
rule $id="ms_drbd_web_slave_on_backup0-rule" $role="Slave" -inf:
#uname ne backup0
2011/6/8 ruslan usifov
> I want exactly slave role will be launch o
Dnia Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:57:21 +0200
Dejan Muhamedagic napisał(a):
Hi
> > So if the resource must run on node bolek, why it is running on node
> > lolek?
>
> Because bolek is not available. A negative preference value (any
> negative value) is going to prevent a resource to run on a node.
> Per
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 03:21:47PM +0300, Aleksey Mykhailov wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've two node cluster created from two xenserver guests
> > each node located on the different dom0
> > node0 on dom0-0
> > node1 on dom0-1
> >
> > for
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 09:28:20 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:32:30AM -0400, imnotpc wrote:
> > On Thursday, June 16, 2011 02:38:51 Florian Haas wrote:
> > > On 06/16/2011 12:50 AM, imnotpc wrote:
> > > >> Funny but it looks fairly unequivocal to me.
> > > >
> > > > Yes
On 2011-06-16 15:41, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> On 16-06-11 15:28, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>> Perhaps somebody may want to add a send sms or mail feature to
>> meatware.
>
> I would very much like to see a general notification system that uses
> the generic mail command to send mail to the root user
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 03:21:47PM +0300, Aleksey Mykhailov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've two node cluster created from two xenserver guests
> each node located on the different dom0
> node0 on dom0-0
> node1 on dom0-1
>
> for stonith I'm going use this http://code.google.com/p/fence-xenserver/
>
> b
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:38:32PM +0200, Pawel Warowny wrote:
> Hi
>
> Because my cluster behaves strangely (which i described in post 'start
> order after manual migration') I created new cluster only for testing.
>
> It consists of two nodes: bolek and lolek
>
> Configuration is very sim
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:54:36PM -0400, Shravan Mishra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are using idrac6 ipmi as stonith device on our 2 node cluster.
> When one of the nodes power cords are being yanked out, both main and the
> backup, the secondary node is not taking over as primary meaning the fe
On 16-06-11 15:28, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Perhaps somebody may want to add a send sms or mail feature to
> meatware.
I would very much like to see a general notification system that uses
the generic mail command to send mail to the root user of the system
(like most daemons do; smartd, mdadm,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:32:30AM -0400, imnotpc wrote:
> On Thursday, June 16, 2011 02:38:51 Florian Haas wrote:
> > On 06/16/2011 12:50 AM, imnotpc wrote:
> > >> Funny but it looks fairly unequivocal to me.
> > >
> > > Yes and no. The message is clear but unless you have someone sitting at
> >
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:57:38PM +0200, Pawel Warowny wrote:
> Dnia Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:14:19 +0200
> Dejan Muhamedagic napisał(a):
>
> Hi
>
> Thank you for reply.
>
> > That's really odd. Is it that at this time vr_debian_squeeze
> > runs on node1?
>
> No, vr_debian_squeeze doesn't run on n
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 05:32:10PM -0500, mark - pacemaker list wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:26:56PM -0500, mark - pacemaker list wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:24 PM, imnotpc wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > What I was t
Hello!
I've two node cluster created from two xenserver guests
each node located on the different dom0
node0 on dom0-0
node1 on dom0-1
for stonith I'm going use this http://code.google.com/p/fence-xenserver/
but questions probably not related to this details , it mostly theoretical
so,
I tried t
Hi
Because my cluster behaves strangely (which i described in post 'start
order after manual migration') I created new cluster only for testing.
It consists of two nodes: bolek and lolek
Configuration is very simple:
At first starting 4 clone resources (res1, res2, res3, res4) one
after another.
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 02:38:51 Florian Haas wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 12:50 AM, imnotpc wrote:
> >> Funny but it looks fairly unequivocal to me.
> >
> > Yes and no. The message is clear but unless you have someone sitting at
> > a console 24/7 running tail on the log file, it has little value.
>
About two month ago, dealing with a bug report of some paying customer,
I fixed some long standing bugs in the heartbeat communication layer
that caused heartbeat to segfault, and other bad behaviour.
These bugs where triggered by "misbehaving" API clients,
respectively massive packet loss on the
On 2011-06-16 12:11, Jelle de Jong wrote:
> On 16-06-11 08:38, Florian Haas wrote:
>> On 06/16/2011 12:50 AM, imnotpc wrote:
Funny but it looks fairly unequivocal to me.
>>>
>>> Yes and no. The message is clear but unless you have someone sitting at
>>> a console 24/7 running tail on the log f
On 16-06-11 08:38, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 12:50 AM, imnotpc wrote:
>>> Funny but it looks fairly unequivocal to me.
>>
>> Yes and no. The message is clear but unless you have someone sitting at
>> a console 24/7 running tail on the log file, it has little value.
>> According to the Clu
20 matches
Mail list logo
