Thought about googling the error?
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Gururaj B Patil gururaj.pa...@bsmail.inwrote:
To support staff,
We in Business Standard Ltd. use pacemaker as clusttering application for
one of our website. Two servers are are in clusttering mode.
One of the server is web
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Proskurin Kirill
k.prosku...@corp.mail.ru wrote:
25.07.2011 10:10, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
Which packages are you using?
It is your official source from repository I build.
Ok. And did you add the pacemaker configuration options to corosync's
config file?
On 07/26/2011 11:00 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Proskurin Kirill
k.prosku...@corp.example.com wrote:
25.07.2011 10:10, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
Which packages are you using?
It is your official source from repository I build.
Ok. And did you add the pacemaker
/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs:
http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20110726/4d99749e/attachment-0001.html
Hello,
On 25.7.11 13:28, Yingliang Yang wrote:
constraints
rsc_colocation id=Sphinx_with_IP rsc=Sphinx score-attribute=INF
with-rsc=Sphinx_IP/
/constraints
There is a problem in your config.
The score-attribute should be score and its value should be INFINITY.
Thanks, you were correct. The
Hi,
I have configured a multi-state(clone)resource float IP(IP).
It is running on all the configure Nodes.
I am trying to stop it using crm_resource command
crm_resource -r IP:0 -p target-role -v stopped
I am getting this error.
Error performing operation : The
Hi, Andrew
I'd like to know whether the latest version(c86cb93c5a57) of pacemaker codes
on the site is stable? If not, how about Pacemaker 1.1.5(01e86afaaa6d)?
BTW, I'd like to know when the version 1.1.6 will get released, will it be
the NEAR future?
Best Regards,
Yingliang Yang
2011/7/22 Dan Urist wrote:
I am in the process of trying to write an fping RA, based on the
pacemaker ping RA. My impetus for this is that I would like the RA to
return success as soon as any ping succeeds; the behavior of linux's
system ping as used in the standard ping RA is to run COUNT
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:41:25 +0800
Yingliang Yang zjut...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/22 Dan Urist wrote:
I am in the process of trying to write an fping RA, based on the
pacemaker ping RA. My impetus for this is that I would like the RA
to return success as soon as any ping succeeds; the
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:36:25AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
On 07/20/2011 11:24 AM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
Hello Andrew,
in fact DRBD was in standalone mode but the cluster was working :
Here is the syslog of the drbd's split brain :
Jul 15 08:45:34 node1 kernel: [1536023.052245] block
On 07/26/2011 11:43 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:36:25AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
On 07/20/2011 11:24 AM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
Hello Andrew,
in fact DRBD was in standalone mode but the cluster was working :
Here is the syslog of the drbd's split brain :
Jul 15 08:45:34
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Yingliang Yang zjut...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Andrew
I'd like to know whether the latest version(c86cb93c5a57) of pacemaker codes
on the site is stable?
Yes. It is.
If not, how about Pacemaker 1.1.5(01e86afaaa6d)?
BTW, I'd like to know when the version 1.1.6
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Hmm. Interesting. I will investigate.
This is an unfortunate side-effect of my history compression patch.
Since we only store the last successful and last failed operation, we
don't have the md5 of the start operation
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Bobbie Lind bl...@sms-fed.com wrote:
Hi group,
I am running a 6 node system, 4 of which mount the LUNs for my Lustre file
system. I currently have 29 LUNs per server set up in 4 Resource Groups. I
understand the default startup/shudown order of the resource
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Proskurin Kirill
k.prosku...@corp.mail.ru wrote:
On 07/19/2011 03:22 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Proskurin Kirill
k.prosku...@corp.mail.ru wrote:
Hello all.
I found what I using corosync with pacemaker ver:0 with installed
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:00 PM, rakesh rakirocker4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I configured a cluster which consists of four nodes,
started Heartbeat/pacemaker on four nodes.
after some point of time 4th nodes gone down unexpectedly and find the
following error messages while debugging all
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi all,
Would somebody (Andrew?) please bring some light on how exactly
redefinition of resource is supposed to be handled?
Below is my (rather perfectionistic) vision on this, please correct me
if/where I'm
/20110726/4d99749e/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:00:56 +1000
From: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
To: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Cluster type is: corosync
Message-ID:
CAEDLWG1s=ahrdxdwdo0r04410j0
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:13 PM, pskrap psk...@hotmail.com wrote:
Devin Reade gdr@... writes:
--On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 09:19:33 AM + pskrap pskrap@...
wrote:
I have a cluster where some of the resources cannot run on the same node.
All resources must be running to provide a
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20110726/4d99749e/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:00:56 +1000
From: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
To: Pacemaker
20 matches
Mail list logo
