On 10/03/2011 05:32 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
corosync-1.4.1
pacemaker-1.1.5
pacemaker runs with ver: 1
2)
This one is scary.
I twice run on situation then pacemaker thinks what resource is started but
it is not.
RA is misbehaving. Pacemaker will only consider a resource running if
the RA
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
03.10.2011 04:41, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[...]
If pacemaker fully finish processing of one membership change - elect
new DC on a quorate partition, and do not try to take over dc role (or
release it) on a
03.10.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanovbub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
03.10.2011 04:41, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[...]
If pacemaker fully finish processing of one membership change - elect
new DC on a quorate partition, and do not try to take over
On 03.10.11 03:47, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
As I wrote before: you should be able to test this easily by sending a
STOP signal to the named process. At least in this situation I see that
the rndc stop doesn't return before those 60s.
Indeed you are right. Thanks for catching.
Dear community,
I have a cluster with DRBD and apache2 resources.
I wanted to do some test with apache2, I knew that my test could break apache2.
Hence I did a
#crm resource unamange apache2
The resource was unmanage at the crm_mon.
When I did my test apache2 didn't restart but corosync try
Hi,
Thanks for the answer below, that clears up why that wasn't working without
a stonith device.
I'm wondering if i would need a stonith device if we plan to have 2
redundant nic interfaces on each node (connected to a different switch) for
the lan connection plus one nic for the drbd sync
Il 29/09/2011 09:13, Andrew Beekhof ha scritto:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Fiorenza Meinifme...@esseweb.eu wrote:
Hi there,
I'm working on stonith on my test cluster. It has, to me, a strange
behaviour: when the condition to fence the other node happens, is it normal
that both
Il 22/09/2011 12:23, Dejan Muhamedagic ha scritto:
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:56:57AM +0200, Fiorenza Meini wrote:
Hi there,
I found this:
http://code.google.com/p/fence-xenserver/wiki/Installation
I installed on my test cluster system and from command line it works
properly, but I have
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:27:56AM -0300, Charles Richard wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the answer below, that clears up why that wasn't working without
a stonith device.
I'm wondering if i would need a stonith device if we plan to have 2
redundant nic interfaces on each node (connected to a
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 10:20:34AM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I want to build a cluster of 4 servers (servers A, B, C, D), with
different resources on them (mysql, webserver):
webservers: A B C D
mysql: A B
Is there a way to make Pacemaker/heartbeat to let assign MySQL IP
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:52:16AM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On 11-09-28 10:20 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I'm really not sure. Need to investigate this area more.
Well, I am experimenting with cibadmin. It's certainly not as nice and
shiny as crm shell though. :-)
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:06:10PM +0100, darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk wrote:
Sorry for top-posting, I'm Outlook-afflicted.
Poor you
This is also my problem; In the full production environment there will be
low-level hardware fencing by means of IBM RSA/ASM but this is a VMware test
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:47:33AM -0400, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Dejan,
Sorry to hijack, I am also working on the same type of setup as a prototype.
What is the best way to get stonith included for VM setups? Maybe an
SSH stonith?
external/libvirt, though somebody said that that
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Kulovits Christian - OS ITSC
christian.kulov...@austrian.com wrote:
Hi Rasto
Both DRBD Console 9.9 and LCMC 1.0 have the same problem, there is only a tab
for the last connected Cluster. The others connected Clusters can only be
selected for disconnect from
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:45:32PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
So, in another thread there was a discussion of using cibadmin to
mitigate possible concurrency issue of crm shell. I have written a test
program to test that theory and unfortunately cibadmin falls down in the
face of heavy
Hi,
29.09.2011 17:47, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Dejan,
Sorry to hijack, I am also working on the same type of setup as a prototype.
What is the best way to get stonith included for VM setups? Maybe an
SSH stonith?
Again, this is just for the prototype.
You may look at fence-virt.
I use
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
03.10.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanovbub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
03.10.2011 04:41, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
[...]
If pacemaker fully finish processing of one
On 04/10/11 04:06, Nick Khamis wrote:
I forgot to ask, for creating an asymmetric cluster, do the services
(mysql, apache etc..) have to
be installed on all the nodes.
Probably. Pacemaker will still try to probe resources on all nodes, to
ensure they're not running, then the RA will return
Hi Andrew,
First thank you for getting back to me.
The strategy is for a split controlled upgrade. Thus having to momentarily
create an isolated cluster, with different software setup, before taking over
the official port. This is at an early stage of thinking. So I might have
missed some
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Gerald Vogt v...@spamcop.net wrote:
On 03.10.11 03:47, Serge Dubrouski wrote:
As I wrote before: you should be able to test this easily by sending
a
STOP signal to the named process. At least in this situation I see
that
the rndc stop doesn't
20 matches
Mail list logo
