On 2013-06-27T12:53:01, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01 pcmk_reboot_action=off port=1
pcmk_host_list=an-c03n01.alteeve.ca
primitive fence_n01_psu1_on stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01
On 2013-06-28T11:11:00, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Maybe you're right, maybe I should stop fighting it and go with the
firefox approach.
That certainly seemed to piss a lot of people off though...
If there's one message I've learned in 13 years of work on Linux HA,
then it
Hello Andrew,
El 27/06/13 14:44, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
You should see additional logs sent to /var/log/pacemaker.log
Finally yesterday issue happened again. This time, node selavi was DC,
and node turifel joined the cluster. Cluster was in status unmanaged.
Unfortunately, I have no
On 28/06/2013, at 5:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-28T11:11:00, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
Maybe you're right, maybe I should stop fighting it and go with the
firefox approach.
That certainly seemed to piss a lot of people off though...
If there's
On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-27T12:53:01, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01 pcmk_reboot_action=off port=1
pcmk_host_list=an-c03n01.alteeve.ca
primitive
On 28/06/2013, at 5:19 AM, Lorenzo Sartoratti lorenzo.sartora...@dei.unipd.it
wrote:
Hi,
we are using pacemaker since two years and we are quite satisfied: thanks!
We have 30 virtual machines running in the cluster and maintained by
pacemaker.
When we stop the machines with crm, they are
On 2013-06-28T20:21:22, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
It looks correct, but not quite sane. ;-) That seems not to be
something you can address, though. I'm thinking that fencing topology
should be smart enough to, if multiple fencing devices are specified, to
know how to expand
On 2013-06-28T18:41:35, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
There's an exception: dropping commonly used external interfaces (say,
ptest) needs to be announced a few releases in advance before enacted
upstream. (And if Enterprise distributions want to keep something, they
have time
On 28/06/2013, at 8:46 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-28T20:21:22, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
It looks correct, but not quite sane. ;-) That seems not to be
something you can address, though. I'm thinking that fencing topology
should be smart enough
On 28/06/2013, at 8:10 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 6:42 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra bcabe...@apsl.net wrote:
Hello Andrew,
El 27/06/13 14:44, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
You should see additional logs sent to /var/log/pacemaker.log
Finally yesterday
On 27/06/2013, at 10:46 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 25/06/2013, at 9:44 PM, Francesco Namuri f.nam...@credires.it wrote:
Can you attach /var/lib/pengine/pe-input-64.bz2 from SERVERNAME1 please?
I'll be able to see if its something we've already fixed.
Nope still
On 28/06/2013, at 8:59 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-28T18:41:35, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
There's an exception: dropping commonly used external interfaces (say,
ptest) needs to be announced a few releases in advance before enacted
upstream. (And if
Hi Lars,
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
[...]
If
cluster-glue's LRM had had such a suite, it'd certainly have helped
tons.)
It did have a regression suite.
Thanks,
Dejan
___
Pacemaker mailing list:
On 2013-06-28T21:01:55, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
I'd agree, but it's not multiple ports on the same device, it's multiple
ports on *different* devices. I don't think a single fencing agent can
handle that - it really looks like something only the higher level can
cope
On 2013-06-28T14:49:06, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
If cluster-glue's LRM had had such a suite, it'd certainly have
helped tons.)
It did have a regression suite.
Yes, well, but it didn't test for LRM_MAX_CHILDREN or the secret
support, for example. So it didn't really
On 2013-06-28T22:04:48, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
I think he did actually.
Well, yes, but the hg history or reading the existing code would
probably have been quite helpful. I'll take not well documented, but
it's hard to say the rewrite was handled very well. But I don't want to
On 06/28/2013 08:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Under this model, not only do I have to find the time to write and test the
new addition, but I also have to:
* keep maintaining the old code until... when?
* probably write and maintain a compatibility layer
* make it possible to choose which
On 06/28/2013 06:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-27T12:53:01, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01 pcmk_reboot_action=off port=1
On 06/28/2013 09:28 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-06-28T21:01:55, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
I'd agree, but it's not multiple ports on the same device, it's multiple
ports on *different* devices. I don't think a single fencing agent can
handle that - it really looks
On 2013-06-28T10:20:56, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01 pcmk_reboot_action=off port=1
pcmk_host_list=an-c03n01.alteeve.ca
primitive fence_n01_psu1_on stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01
On 2013-06-28T10:27:54, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Basically, unless we can do this better, having multiple devices per
fence topology level needs to be considered broken and might be better
removed.
NO NO NO NO.
Please do not remove this. I can not use pacemaker unless I can keep
On 06/28/2013 10:36 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01 pcmk_reboot_action=off port=1
pcmk_host_list=an-c03n01.alteeve.ca
primitive fence_n01_psu1_on stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01
On 2013-06-28T11:29:35, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
In rhcs, you can control the fence device's action using 'action=...'
attribute in the device ... element. So for us rhcs migrants, we
expect that action=... in the fence primitive will have the same
effect. As of now, as you know, this
On 2013-06-28T11:20:32, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Yes, a failed on action would then fail the method. This is
sub-optimal as FenceAgentAPI says that only the off portion of
reboot needs to succeed. However, I don't consider this a show stopper
because on action of PDUs simply means
On 06/28/2013 11:45 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-06-28T11:20:32, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Yes, a failed on action would then fail the method. This is
sub-optimal as FenceAgentAPI says that only the off portion of
reboot needs to succeed. However, I don't consider this a show
On 06/28/2013 11:34 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-06-28T11:29:35, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
In rhcs, you can control the fence device's action using 'action=...'
attribute in the device ... element. So for us rhcs migrants, we
expect that action=... in the fence primitive will
On 28/06/2013, at 9:16 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 8:10 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 6:42 PM, Bernardo Cabezas Serra bcabe...@apsl.net wrote:
Hello Andrew,
El 27/06/13 14:44, Andrew Beekhof escribió:
You should
On 28/06/2013, at 11:37 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
I'm not sure there's a huge downside in it for you?
Ok, lets take attrd for example - which I've been wanted to rewrite to be
truly atomic for half a decade or more.
If it's rewritten in a way that doesn't affect
On 29/06/2013, at 12:22 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-27T12:53:01, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
On 29/06/2013, at 12:36 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-28T10:20:56, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
primitive fence_n01_psu1_off stonith:fence_apc_snmp \
params ipaddr=an-p01 pcmk_reboot_action=off port=1
pcmk_host_list=an-c03n01.alteeve.ca
primitive
On 06/28/2013 07:22 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 29/06/2013, at 12:22 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 06/28/2013 06:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 28/06/2013, at 5:22 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2013-06-27T12:53:01, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
primitive
31 matches
Mail list logo
