Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker and OpenStack RA

2013-09-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
I replied to your entry here: http://openstack.redhat.com/forum/discussion/538/pacemaker-and-openstack-ra-issues#Item_3 But for completeness: > Any ideas? > This: > p_glance-api_start_0 (node=main-controller, call=71, rc=1, status=Timed Out): > unknown error > suggests that there was no

Re: [Pacemaker] different behavior cibadmin -Ql with cman and corosync2

2013-09-10 Thread Andrey Groshev
Hello Christine, Andrew and all. I'm sorry - a little was unwell, so did not answer. What we end this stream of messages? Who will change? corosync or pacemaker? 05.09.2013, 15:49, "Christine Caulfield" : > On 05/09/13 11:33, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >>  On 05/09/2013, at 6:37 PM, Christine Caulf

Re: [Pacemaker] Moving cloned resources

2013-09-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 11/09/2013, at 12:58 AM, Matias R. Cuenca del Rey wrote: > Thank you Andrew, > > If I can't move instances of a clone. How can I do to rebalance my IP > resource trough the three nodes? Set its resource-stickiness to 0 until everything moves back > > Thanks, > > Matías R. Cuenca del Rey

Re: [Pacemaker] Postgresql Replication

2013-09-10 Thread Takatoshi MATSUO
Hi Eloy Please see http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/PgSQL_Replicated_Cluster . In the document, it uses virtual IP to receive connection, so it doesn't need to change recovery.conf. Thanks, Takatoshi MATSUO 2013/9/11 Eloy Coto Pereiro : > Hi, > > In Postgresql if you use wal replication >

[Pacemaker] Postgresql Replication

2013-09-10 Thread Eloy Coto Pereiro
Hi, In Postgresql if you use wal replication < http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Streaming_Replication> when the master servers fails need to change the recovery.conf on the slave server. In this case any tool, when the master is down, execute a command and get this info? Is this the right tool for

Re: [Pacemaker] Moving cloned resources

2013-09-10 Thread Matias R. Cuenca del Rey
Thank you Andrew, If I can't move instances of a clone. How can I do to rebalance my IP resource trough the three nodes? Thanks, Matías R. Cuenca del Rey On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Matias R. Cuenca del Rey wrote: > [root@www-proxylb01 ~]# rpm -qi pcs > Name: pcs

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource ordering/colocating question (DRBD + LVM + FS)

2013-09-10 Thread Heikki Manninen
Not sure whether I'm doing this the right way but here goes.. With resources started on node #1: # crm_simulate -L -s -d pgdbsrv01.cl1.local Current cluster status: Online: [ pgdbsrv01.cl1.local pgdbsrv02.cl1.local ] Master/Slave Set: DRBD_ms_data01 [DRBD_data01] Masters: [ pgdbsrv01.cl1.

Re: [Pacemaker] [Linux-HA] Probably a regression of the linbit drbd agent between pacemaker 1.1.8 and 1.1.10

2013-09-10 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 01:41:17PM +0200, Andreas Mock wrote: > Hi Lars, > > here also my official "Thank you very much" looking > at the problem. > I've been looking forward to the official release > of drbd 8.4.4. > > Or do you need disoriented rc testers like me? ;-) Why not? That's what rel