Hi David, Jan,
For the time being corosync 2.3.3 looks stable with libqb 0.17.0 with both
build from source.
Thank you very much for the guidance!
Attila
-Original Message-
From: David Vossel [mailto:dvos...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 9:22 PM
To: The Pacemaker
2014-03-17 16:37 GMT+09:00 Kazunori INOUE kazunori.ino...@gmail.com:
2014-03-15 4:08 GMT+09:00 David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com:
- Original Message -
From: Kazunori INOUE kazunori.ino...@gmail.com
To: pm pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 5:52:38 AM
Subject:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
Hi
I am in the process of migrating away from the pcmk plugin for corosync and
converting to cman.
So from what I gather its
Pacemaker - cman - corosync
Can I still configure corosync with /etc/corosync/corosync.conf
nope...eth1 is direct connected
2014-03-05 14:00 GMT+01:00 Nikita Staroverov nsfo...@gmail.com:
05.03.2014 16:50, Beo Banks пишет:
thanks jan. but i am using the newest rhel release and i have still the
issue.
Hello, how your nodes interconnected? Is there switch between them?
Hi,
Has anyone setup a centos 6.5 LVS with ldirectord and pacemaker. Look like
I can't find the ldirectord package
[root@fwpci-01 ~]# yum search ldirector
Warning: No matches found for: ldirector
No Matches found
Am I missing something? I use to setup ldirectord on a on a centos 5.8, I
had
I don't believe we RHEL (or clones) include ldirectord, I think piranha is the
equivalent. Ryan?
On 18 Mar 2014, at 4:04 am, Luc Paulin paulins...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone setup a centos 6.5 LVS with ldirectord and pacemaker. Look like I
can't find the ldirectord package
Oh
Well sort of it was to align with RHEL6.x, I guess I will have to re eval when
it comes time to move to RHEL7.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Gianluca Cecchi [mailto:gianluca.cec...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 17 March 2014 11:27 PM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
On 17 Mar 2014, at 11:26 pm, Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker wrote:
Hi
I am in the process of migrating away from the pcmk plugin for corosync and
converting to cman.
So from what I gather its
Pacemaker
On 18 Mar 2014, at 9:46 am, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
alex.sa...@yieldbroker.com wrote:
Oh
Well sort of it was to align with RHEL6.x, I guess I will have to re eval
when it comes time to move to RHEL7.
If you're using pcs, then you should hardly notice any difference.
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Kazunori INOUE kazunori.ino...@gmail.com
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:51:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] crmd was aborted at pacemaker 1.1.11
2014-03-17 16:37 GMT+09:00 Kazunori
On 14 Mar 2014, at 7:14 am, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gianluca Cecchi gianluca.cec...@gmail.com
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 12:00:16 PM
Subject: [Pacemaker] How to
On 14 Mar 2014, at 7:01 am, David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Yair Ogen (yaogen) yao...@cisco.com
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 9:22:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker]
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 09:31:02AM +1100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I don't believe we RHEL (or clones) include ldirectord, I think
piranha is the equivalent. Ryan?
Correct. We've never included ldirectord in RHEL, and it does not
appear to exist in EPEL either. As mentioned, there was a package
On 14 Mar 2014, at 1:18 am, Karl Rößmann k.roessm...@fkf.mpg.de wrote:
Hi,
I changed the running resource by
crm / configure / edit / commit. It seemed to work.
I stopped the resource, and changed some details,
Whenever I commit again I get this warning:
warning: do_log: FSA: Input
On 14 Mar 2014, at 7:11 am, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
On 13/03/14 04:08 PM, Andreas Sinn wrote:
stonith-enabled=false \
no-quorum-policy=ignore
I can't speak to your main question, but this is a split-brain waiting to
happen. Please configure and test stonith.
On 14 Mar 2014, at 10:32 pm, Gabriel Gomiz ggo...@cooperativaobrera.coop
wrote:
Hi to all!
We've a 4 node cluster and recently experienced a weird issue with Pacemaker
that resulted in three
database instance resources duplicated (running simultaneously in 2 nodes)
and subsequent data
On 14 Mar 2014, at 2:23 pm, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
alex.sa...@yieldbroker.com wrote:
I have setup constraints to have orig and clone resources on separate boxes,
but after rebooting devrp1 all the resources are staying on devrp2
Can you attach the result of 'cibadmin -Ql' when the cluster
On 14 Mar 2014, at 1:00 am, Bingham knee-jerk-react...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My setup:
I have a 2 node cluster using pacemaker and heartbeat. I have 2
resources, ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr and lsb:rabbitmq-server.
I have these 2 resources grouped together and they
On 13 Mar 2014, at 4:13 pm, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
alex.sa...@yieldbroker.com wrote:
Well I think I have worked it out
# Create ybrp ip address
pcs resource create ybrpip ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 params ip=10.172.214.50
cidr_netmask=24 nic=eth0 clusterip_hash=sourceip-sourceport \
On 12 Mar 2014, at 1:45 pm, Yusuke Iida yusk.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Andrew
2014-03-12 6:37 GMT+09:00 Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
Mar 07 13:24:14 [2528] vm01 crmd: (te_callbacks:493 ) error:
te_update_diff: Ingoring create operation for /cib 0xf91c10,
configuration
On 13 Mar 2014, at 11:44 pm, Attila Megyeri amegy...@minerva-soft.com wrote:
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Jan Friesse [mailto:jfrie...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:03 AM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker/corosync
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2014 11:51 AM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] help building 2 node config
On 13 Mar 2014, at 4:13 pm, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
On 18 Mar 2014, at 1:36 pm, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
alex.sa...@yieldbroker.com wrote:
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2014 11:51 AM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] help
Hi,
In case of two nodes cluster in case of Active/Active or Active/Passive, if
split brain happen , which node will STONITH the other ?
--
KHALED MOHAMMED ATTEYA
System Engineer
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
On 17/03/14 11:52 PM, khaled atteya wrote:
Hi,
In case of two nodes cluster in case of Active/Active or Active/Passive,
if split brain happen , which node will STONITH the other ?
The fast node is the short answer.
The long answer is that you can give one node a priority over the other
by
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2014 2:02 PM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] help building 2 node config
On 18 Mar 2014, at 1:36 pm, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker
2014-03-18 8:03 GMT+09:00 David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com:
- Original Message -
From: Kazunori INOUE kazunori.ino...@gmail.com
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:51:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] crmd was aborted at
27 matches
Mail list logo
