On 30 Sep 2014, at 6:22 am, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:50:58AM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew (and others).
>>
>> For a certain use case (yes, I'm talking about DRBD "peer-fencing" on
>> loss of replication link), it would be nice to be able to say:
>>
>>
On 30 Sep 2014, at 5:32 am, Dmitry Pozdeiev wrote:
> Forgot provide system info.
>
> Gentoo Linux 3.14.14 x86_64
> systemd 215-r3
> netctl 1.9
> corosync 2.3.3
> pacemaker 1.1.10
^^ systemd support has been a bit of a recurring thorn of late.
You probably need to upgrade pacemaker all the way
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:50:58AM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew (and others).
>
> For a certain use case (yes, I'm talking about DRBD "peer-fencing" on
> loss of replication link), it would be nice to be able to say:
>
> update some_attribute=some_attribute+1 where some_attribute
Forgot provide system info.
Gentoo Linux 3.14.14 x86_64
systemd 215-r3
netctl 1.9
corosync 2.3.3
pacemaker 1.1.10
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.
Hello, friends.
I have two-node cluster (nodes named 'obvo' as primary and 'back' as
backup). I'm trying to make cluster to keep VLAN-interface with a number of
IP-addresses. But problem is when resource (systemd unit) runs on 'obvo' it
does cycled restarts until I stop resource. On 'back' this pr
On 22 Sep 2014, at 11:22 pm, Cédric Dufour - Idiap Research Institute
wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> My PM 1.1.12 cluster is quite large: 22 nodes, ~300 resources.
>
> When gracefully shutting down the current DC (iow. move resources elsewhere,
> node standby, pacemaker stop, corosync stop) the C
On 25 Sep 2014, at 8:25 pm, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 25 Sep 2014, at 6:49 pm, Gang U Xu wrote:
>
>> Hi ,
>>
>> I am new to pacemaker.
>> I searched from google and can only find rpm for rhel with x86 arch
>> Can pacemaker installed on rhel 6/7 with ppc64 arch and s390x arch?
>
> It
On 27 Sep 2014, at 5:40 am, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:46:30 +0200 Felix Zachlod
> wrote:
>> I am currently trying to add a third node only for giving a quorum a
>> to the cluster in case a servicing node fails. But oviously I can't
>> get it right.
>
>> This is the
On 28 Sep 2014, at 5:56 pm, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> I have two node cluster with single master/slave resource (replicated
> database) using pacemaker+openais on SLES11 SP3 (pacemaker
> 1.1.11-3ca8c3b). I hit weird situation that I did not see before, and
> I cannot really understand it. Assumi