Re: [Pacemaker] Globally-unique clone cleanup on remote nodes

20.11.2014 09:25, Andrew Beekhof пишет: > >> On 20 Nov 2014, at 5:12 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> >> 20.11.2014 01:57, Andrew Beekhof пишет: >>> On 19 Nov 2014, at 4:27 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: Hi all, just an observation. I have a globally-uniqu

Re: [Pacemaker] Globally-unique clone cleanup on remote nodes

> On 20 Nov 2014, at 5:12 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > > 20.11.2014 01:57, Andrew Beekhof пишет: >> >>> On 19 Nov 2014, at 4:27 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> just an observation. >>> >>> I have a globally-unique clone with 50 instances in a cluster consisting >>>

Re: [Pacemaker] Globally-unique clone cleanup on remote nodes

20.11.2014 01:57, Andrew Beekhof пишет: > >> On 19 Nov 2014, at 4:27 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> just an observation. >> >> I have a globally-unique clone with 50 instances in a cluster consisting >> of one cluster node and 3 remote bare-metal nodes. >> When I run "crm_resou

Re: [Pacemaker] Globally-unique clone cleanup on remote nodes

> On 19 Nov 2014, at 4:27 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > > Hi all, > > just an observation. > > I have a globally-unique clone with 50 instances in a cluster consisting > of one cluster node and 3 remote bare-metal nodes. > When I run "crm_resource -C -r ''" (crmsh does that for me), > it wri

Re: [Pacemaker] exportfs resource agent modifications

of course I currently use an active/active setting for some load spreading issues, but I will try to use an (more ordered) active/passive setting. I need that for VMWare and afaik it is NFSv3 so far. Thanks for pointing things out. Cheers, Hauke --- original message timestamp: Monday, November