Re: [Pacemaker] One more globally-unique clone question

2015-01-20 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
21.01.2015 03:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 20 Jan 2015, at 4:13 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: 20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 17 Jan 2015, at 1:25 am, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: Hi all, Trying to reproduce problem with early stop of globally-unique clone instances during move

Re: [Pacemaker] One more globally-unique clone question

2015-01-20 Thread Andrew Beekhof
> On 20 Jan 2015, at 4:13 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > > 20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >>> On 17 Jan 2015, at 1:25 am, Vladislav Bogdanov >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Trying to reproduce problem with early stop of globally-unique >>> clone instances during move to anoth

Re: [Pacemaker] breaking resource dependencies by replacing resource group by co-location constrains

2015-01-20 Thread Andrew Beekhof
group grp_application res_mount-application res_Service-IP res_mount-CIFSshareData res_mount-CIFSshareData2 res_mount-CIFSshareData3 res_MyApplication is just a shortcut for colocation res_Service-IP with res_mount-application colocation res_mount-CIFSshareData with res_Service-IP ... and c

Re: [Pacemaker] announcement: schedule for resource-agents release 3.9.6

2015-01-20 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hello, On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 04:25:53PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hello, > > This is a tentative schedule for resource-agents v3.9.6: > > 3.9.6-rc1: January 16. The repository was tagged with v3.9.6-rc1 just now, a bit late due to illness. Packages for some popular distributions (Cent

[Pacemaker] breaking resource dependencies by replacing resource group by co-location constrains

2015-01-20 Thread Sven Moeller
Hi, i have a Cluster running on SLES 11 SP3. A resource group is defined. So every entry in that resource group is a hard dependency for the folliowing resource in that group. If just only one resource fails on both nodes, the resource res_MyApplication won't be started. I want to change that b

Re: [Pacemaker] Corosync fails to start when NIC is absent

2015-01-20 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > Kostiantyn, > > >> One more thing to clarify. >> You said "rebind can be avoided" - what does it mean? > > By that I mean that as long as you don't shutdown interface everything > will work as expected. Interface shutdown is administrator deci

Re: [Pacemaker] Corosync fails to start when NIC is absent

2015-01-20 Thread Kostiantyn Ponomarenko
Got it. Thank you =) I just thought about possibility of a NIC to burn down. Thank you, Kostya On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > Kostiantyn, > > > > One more thing to clarify. > > You said "rebind can be avoided" - what does it mean? > > By that I mean that as long as you d

Re: [Pacemaker] Corosync fails to start when NIC is absent

2015-01-20 Thread Jan Friesse
Kostiantyn, > One more thing to clarify. > You said "rebind can be avoided" - what does it mean? By that I mean that as long as you don't shutdown interface everything will work as expected. Interface shutdown is administrator decision, system doesn't do it automagically :) Regards, Honza >