[Pacemaker] [RPMs] clusterlabs.org and epel-6 ?

2011-07-11 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi, On clusterlabs.org, there are 2 repositories epel-5 and epel-6. However the epel-6 repository [1] is empty. Do you guys plan to use it or should we build our own RPMs because it's never going to happen ? I believe, like many, with (finally) Centos 6 out we would like to start to upgrade

Re: [Pacemaker] [RPMs] clusterlabs.org and epel-6 ?

2011-07-11 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Re, How many nano-seconds has centos-6 been out for? Not much I agree. I didn't want to be offensive, don't read me wrong. But because the repo exists for a while (3 months or so) and scientific linux 6 and oracle linux 6 were out as well I was wondering if this was going to be used or not.

Re: [Pacemaker] dampen / pingd - how to be sure pingd will be updated

2011-01-17 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hey, This may be dumb or obvious but it took me a long time to understand why my pingd with dampen never got updated! So I think that this may be useful for everybody to share. In short: You MUST define a monitor interval HIGHER than the the dampen delay. Which version was this? I

[Pacemaker] dampen / pingd - how to be sure pingd will be updated

2010-12-20 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hey guys, This may be dumb or obvious but it took me a long time to understand why my pingd with dampen never got updated! So I think that this may be useful for everybody to share. In short: You MUST define a monitor interval HIGHER than the the dampen delay. An example is better than

[Pacemaker] [RPM] ldirectord on clusterlabs.org (epel5)

2010-11-21 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hey guys, I am using ldirectord and pacemaker from the clusterlabs epel5 repo. However the latest ldirectord 1.0.3 can't be installed on a el5 (centos5 in my case). Yum whinges about the following : ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: heartbeat-ldirectord conflicts with

Re: [Pacemaker] [PING] ping, pingd and CIB updates, pick your poison :)

2010-09-02 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi Andrew, First thanks for remembering my issue and looking into it :) Jul 30 11:37:50 [..] Yes but... See the time line pasted below. (at 11:37, it starts to do something) 11:20AM : cluster is up and running 11:25AM : shutdown the IP 11:30AM : force a refresh with attrd_updater (because

Re: [Pacemaker] [PING] ping, pingd and CIB updates, pick your poison :)

2010-07-30 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hey, How long did you wait? dampen=121 means that attrd will wait just over 2 minutes before updating the CIB 10min. Thomas ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project

Re: [Pacemaker] [PING] ping, pingd and CIB updates, pick your poison :)

2010-07-30 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Re, [..] I can provide a hb_report if necessary. See in attachment a report for the simple config below. Note that I dumbly erased the conf before doing the report but I paste it below. I've done a very simple cluster. 2 nodes running a dummy resource with 2 cloned pings testing a virtual

Re: [Pacemaker] Problem: No space left on device.

2010-03-05 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi Kees, touch: cannot touch `testfile': No space left on device I definitely think that it isn't a pacemaker issue :) I believe you have no more inodes even if you can see free space left. Try: df -i. And then google about your (common) system issue. Cheers, Thomas

Re: [Pacemaker] ha-clustering repo?

2010-02-06 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hey Erich, Did I miss an announcement? Are they to be found somewhere else? I see the pacemaker-mgmt rpms there too, but not the regular pacemaker rpms. Repo. is : http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm/ Repository is also announced in the Install doco : http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install

Re: [Pacemaker] Announce: Pacemaker 1.0.7 (stable) Released

2010-01-19 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hey, Pre-built packages for Pacemaker and it s immediate dependancies are currently building and will be available for openSUSE, SLES, Fedora, RHEL, CentOS from the ClusterLabs Build Area (http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm) shortly. Thanks Andrew. I'll move from 1.0.6 + patch to 1.0.7 at the end

Re: [Pacemaker] Error on compiling Pacemaker-GUI

2010-01-10 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi, I got the follow error after untar the tar ball of Pacemaker GUI: [..] aclocal:configure.in:57: warning: macro `AM_PO_SUBDIRS' not found in library Do a : autoreconf -ifs See thread: [RPM] pacemaker-mgmt for corosync 1.1.2 and pacemaker 1.0.6 Thomas

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

2010-01-07 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi Andrew, Can you log a bug for that please? http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2301 ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

[Pacemaker] [BUG] crm_mon different output

2010-01-07 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi, I notice a small issue when using crm_mon. Indeed the following command don't output the same information about the inactives resources : * crm_mon -r -n -1 * crm_mon -r -n -h /tmp/tom.html More info: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2302 Cheers, Thomas

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ? :: crm shell

2010-01-06 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hey Dejan, [..] Does updated mean deleted now ? :) update doesn't sound like delete to me :) It was a jibe :) That's really strange since crm doesn't depend on any internal business of CRM. Remember, I'm using the latest pacemaker version as suggested by Andrew to fix some of my clone

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

2010-01-06 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Re, I've just had 2 orphans (tom-DNS:2,tom-DNS:3) for a clone containing 2 groups (tom-DNS:0, tom-DNS:1). Anyway the situation is far better than before, no more craziness during cleanups. I will dig and test more tomorrow and give you an update to see if I can reproduce the issue. 1. I was

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

2010-01-05 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi Andrew Any chance you could download the latest tarball and try that? http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/archive/1aa7cf1450e4.tar.bz2 Awesome! No more orphans ! \o/ Everything is working now, it's clean and tidy. *But* ... there is a small regression in the crm tool. When

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

2010-01-05 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Re, Any chance you could download the latest tarball and try that? http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/archive/1aa7cf1450e4.tar.bz2 Awesome! No more orphans ! \o/ Almost actually :( I've just had 2 orphans (tom-DNS:2,tom-DNS:3) for a clone containing 2 groups (tom-DNS:0,

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

2010-01-04 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Re, So cloned groups are not fun and side effects are random :) I will do more tests without IPAddr2 which seems a bit fancy and dodgy. I've just tried to clone a group tom-TEST containing 2 simple primitives (ocf:homemade:named and ocf:pacemaker:Dummy). The group runs fine but when I ask

[Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

2010-01-03 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi, I noticed weird stuff with pacemaker when I ask it to clone a group. Let's say that I have a group containing 4 primitives (1 named process + 3 IPAddr2 to load on lo). I want to clone the group tom-DNS twice. crm configure clone tom-DNS-clone tom-DNS meta clone-max=2 If the group is

[Pacemaker] [BUG] IPaddr2 - default clusterhash value

2010-01-03 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hey, When you use IPaddr2 in a clone, it will use a clusterip mechanism. The default value for the hash is sourceip-sourceport. But this won't work and will trigger errors because the line 281 is : IP_CIP_HASH=${OCF_RESKEY_clusterip_hash:-'sourceip-sourceport'} and I think that should

[Pacemaker] [RPM] pacemaker-mgmt for corosync 1.1.2 and pacemaker 1.0.6

2009-12-16 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Heya, I know that not everybody does like GUI but sometimes it's handy to see the big picture. So here is a corosync compatible version of pacemaker-mgmt. I didn't do much except changing the Requires: in the .spec file. All credits still goes to ygao at novell.com for all the packaging

Re: [Pacemaker] Asymmetrical cluster : should it probe resources that won't be installed on a node ?

2009-12-09 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi Andrew, no, 1 isn't the default, IIRC its -1 (ie. keep them all) Indeed, I saw that in hb_gui _but_ in the documentation it's written that it's 1. So I prefered to quote what the doco said instead of hb_gui. See :

Re: [Pacemaker] Asymmetrical cluster : should it probe resources that won't be installed on a node ?

2009-12-08 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi Andrew, First thanks for your time, your responsiveness and the great piece of software you're providing us. Thank you!. The logging could probably be toned down in such cases though. Hmm, I don't know how to do that. Is it possible from my side or did you said that as a remark (for the

[Pacemaker] Asymmetrical cluster : should it probe resources that won't be installed on a node ?

2009-12-07 Thread Thomas Guthmann
Hi, I was wondering why pacemaker is throwing errors about program not installed when it is normal that is not. For instance, on a loadbalancer node (ed-lb2) we don't want to host named (DNS daemon). The cluster is working so far even if pacemaker seems not happy because it still tries to