Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

Hi Andrew, Can you log a bug for that please? ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Thomas Guthmann wrote: > Re, > >> I've just had 2 orphans (tom-DNS:2,tom-DNS:3) for a clone containing 2 >> groups (tom-DNS:0, tom-DNS:1). Anyway the situation is far better than >> before, no more craziness during cleanups. I will dig and test more >> tomorrow and

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

Re, I've just had 2 orphans (tom-DNS:2,tom-DNS:3) for a clone containing 2 groups (tom-DNS:0, tom-DNS:1). Anyway the situation is far better than before, no more craziness during cleanups. I will dig and test more tomorrow and give you an update to see if I can reproduce the issue. 1. I was wo

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ? :: crm shell

Hey Dejan, [..] Does "updated" mean deleted now ? :) "update" doesn't sound like "delete" to me :) It was a jibe :) That's really strange since crm doesn't depend on any internal business of CRM. Remember, I'm using the latest pacemaker version as suggested by Andrew to fix some of my clone

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

Hi, On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 03:35:10PM +1000, Thomas Guthmann wrote: > Hi Andrew > > >Any chance you could download the latest tarball and try that? > > > > http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/archive/1aa7cf1450e4.tar.bz2 > > Awesome! No more orphans ! \o/ > Everything is working

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

Re, Any chance you could download the latest tarball and try that? http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/archive/1aa7cf1450e4.tar.bz2 Awesome! No more orphans ! \o/ Almost actually :( I've just had 2 orphans (tom-DNS:2,tom-DNS:3) for a clone containing 2 groups (tom-DNS:0, to

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

Hi Andrew Any chance you could download the latest tarball and try that? http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/archive/1aa7cf1450e4.tar.bz2 Awesome! No more orphans ! \o/ Everything is working now, it's clean and tidy. *But* ... there is a small regression in the crm tool. When I

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Thomas Guthmann wrote: > Re, > >> So cloned groups are not fun and side effects are random :) I will do >> more tests without IPAddr2 which seems a bit fancy and dodgy. > > I've just tried to clone a group tom-TEST containing 2 simple primitives > (ocf:homemade:name

Re: [Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

Re, So cloned groups are not fun and side effects are random :) I will do more tests without IPAddr2 which seems a bit fancy and dodgy. I've just tried to clone a group tom-TEST containing 2 simple primitives (ocf:homemade:named and ocf:pacemaker:Dummy). The group runs fine but when I ask pa

[Pacemaker] [BUG] Clone + group = orphan(s) ?

Hi, I noticed weird stuff with pacemaker when I ask it to clone a group. Let's say that I have a group containing 4 primitives (1 named process + 3 IPAddr2 to load on lo). I want to clone the group tom-DNS twice. crm configure clone tom-DNS-clone tom-DNS meta clone-max=2 If the group is