On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:25 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
...
Remaining diffs seem to be not related to my changes.
Unlikely I'm afraid.
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 08:24 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:25 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
...
Remaining
On 5/10/2011 at 08:22 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 08:24 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:25 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:15 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:15 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at
I thought you said you were running 1.1?
May 5 17:09:33 devel1 pacemakerd: [5929]: info: read_config: Reading
configure for stack: corosync
This message is specific to the devel branch.
Update to get the following fix and you should be fine:
I had 1.1 but Dejan asked my to rebase my patches on devel.
So long story short: devel now works after upgrading to the rev you
mentioned and I got back to working on my patches.
Thanx
Holger
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 10:58 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I thought you said you were running 1.1?
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:25 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
...
Remaining diffs seem to be not related to my changes.
Unlikely I'm afraid. We run the regression tests after every commit
and complain loudly if they
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:41 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Unfortunately the devel code does not run at all in my environment so I
have to fix this first.
Oh? I ran CTS on it the other day and it was fine here.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:41 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Unfortunately the devel code does not run at all in my environment so I
have to fix
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:41 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Unfortunately the
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
On
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:41 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Unfortunately the devel code does not run at all in my environment so I
have to fix this first.
Oh? I ran CTS on it the other day and it was fine here.
I installed pacemaker-devel on top of a compilation of pacemaker-1.1. In
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:58 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
why?
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:58 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
why?
CMD_ERR(Resource %s not moved:
specifying --master
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
why?
CMD_ERR(Resource %s not moved:
specifying --master is not supported for
--move-from\n, rsc_id);
it did not look sensible to me
Hi Holger,
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
why?
CMD_ERR(Resource %s not moved:
specifying --master is not supported for
--move-from\n, rsc_id);
it did not look sensible
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
why?
CMD_ERR(Resource %s not moved:
specifying --master is not supported for
--move-from\n, rsc_id);
it did not look sensible to me but I can't recall the exact reasons 8-)
It's now implemented.
also the
Hi Holger,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:21:31PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 12:33 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
New syntax:
---
crm_resource --move-from --resource myresource --node mynode
- all resource variants: check whether active on mynode,
why?
CMD_ERR(Resource %s not moved:
specifying --master is not supported for
--move-from\n, rsc_id);
also the legacy handling is a little off - do a make install and run
tools/regression.sh and you'll see what i mean.
other than that the crm_resource part looks pretty
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 12:33 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
New syntax:
---
crm_resource --move-from --resource myresource --node mynode
- all resource variants: check whether active on mynode, then create
standby constraint
crm_resource --move-from --resource
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:36PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Ah, right, sorry, wanted to ask about the difference between
move-off
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:38 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:36PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Ah, right,
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 08:57 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:38 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:36PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM,
Hi Holger,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:03:49AM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 08:57 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:38 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Ah, right, sorry, wanted to ask about the difference between
move-off and move. The description looks the same as for move. Is
it that in this case it is for clones so crm_resource needs an
extra node parameter? You
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:36PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Ah, right, sorry, wanted to ask about the difference between
move-off and move. The description looks the same as for move. Is
it that in this case
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:38 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:36PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Ah, right, sorry, wanted to ask about the difference between
move-off and move. The
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 21:31 +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 15:24 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:05 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM,
Hi Holger,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:19:56PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 11:48 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:40 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:19:56PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:24 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:21:40PM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi,
I would like to submit 2 patches of an initial implementation for
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:05 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:24 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
Hi Dejan,
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:11 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55:57AM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:24 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:21:40PM +0100, Holger Teutsch
Hi,
I would like to submit 2 patches of an initial implementation for
discussion.
Patch 1 implements migration of the Master role of an m/s resource to
another node in crm_resource
Patch 2 adds support for the shell.
crm_resource does this with options
crm_resource --move --resource ms_test
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:21:40PM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi,
I would like to submit 2 patches of an initial implementation for
discussion.
Patch 1 implements migration of the Master role of an m/s resource to
another node in crm_resource
Patch 2 adds support for the shell.
36 matches
Mail list logo
