Re: [Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

2009-10-30 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, Or are you looking for the ability to do more than simply prevent resources from running? Yes. For the realization of the function to assure the practice of the resources of the cluster, we use respawn. We found the function that it might be replaced of respawn in a road map of

Re: [Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

2009-10-29 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Apologies for the delay On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:13 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi Andrew, Ok, but I'm trying to understand why. Thank you. What function are these daemons performing?  Why do they need to keep running even when the node is in standby? For example, respawn

Re: [Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

2009-09-21 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:09 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi Andrew, I still don't understand why you can't simply make them regular cluster resources. Can you please explain? I understand your opinion. I surely understand that simple RA can operate an object of respawn by

Re: [Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

2009-09-21 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:00:37PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 3:09 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi Andrew, I still don't understand why you can't simply make them regular cluster resources. Can you please explain? I understand your opinion. I

Re: [Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

2009-09-21 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Lars, I understand that I can come true by the method that you showed enough. However, we wanted to do respawn under the cluster software if possible. We talk about a substitute method again, too. Thank you. Hideo Yamauchi. --- Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com wrote: On Mon, Sep

Re: [Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

2009-09-21 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, I'm almost afraid to ask, why would someone need this capability? In the case of the environment that shifted from version 1 of Heartbeat, I think that the user may do how to use such respawn. We talk about a substitute method again, too. Thank you. Hideo Yamauchi. --- Andrew

Re: [Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

2009-09-21 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:47:56PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: I understand that I can come true by the method that you showed enough. However, we wanted to do respawn under the cluster software if possible. Why, though? It's not the right solution to the problem. - Matt

Re: [Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

2009-09-17 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 02:03:14PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: Hi, We test a shift to new environment(Corosync+Pacemaker...) now. A demand was discussed by the next email. * http://marc.info/?l=openaism=124615212603435w=2 Our many users use respawn. These many users

Re: [Pacemaker] A function demand of the new environment.

2009-09-17 Thread renayama19661014
Hi Andrew, I still don't understand why you can't simply make them regular cluster resources. Can you please explain? I understand your opinion. I surely understand that simple RA can operate an object of respawn by shifting. However, an object of respawn of all users cannot shift to RA. For