Hi,
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 05:15:47PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Hello Dejan,
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:31:27PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Hello Dejan,
On Thursday 24 December 2009, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hello Dejan,
On Thursday 24 December 2009, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
[...]
In a pacemaker cluster with correctly enables STONITH the cluster
manager takes care that the resource is only mounted on one node,
isn't it? At least in my understanding it should. Only after getting
the
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:31:27PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Hello Dejan,
On Thursday 24 December 2009, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
[...]
In a pacemaker cluster with correctly enables STONITH the cluster
manager takes care that the resource is only mounted on one node,
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 05:50:57PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
On Wednesday 23 December 2009, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:52:34PM +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Hi,
The Lustre Filesystem uses a feature called Multiple Mount Protection to
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 06:52:34PM +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Hi,
The Lustre Filesystem uses a feature called Multiple Mount Protection to make
sure that one device is really only mounted by one node.
My question now: Is this feature really needed in a pacemaker cluster?
Hi,
The Lustre Filesystem uses a feature called Multiple Mount Protection to make
sure that one device is really only mounted by one node.
My question now: Is this feature really needed in a pacemaker cluster?
In a pacemaker cluster with correctly enables STONITH the cluster manager
takes
