Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker on Fedora 10 -- OpenAIS/Corosync version question

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 19:23, Ty! Boyack wrote: > Thanks Andrew!  I have been using that install page from the wiki quite a > bit.  The difficulty I'm running into stems from rpm package dependencies. >  With our package set in fedora openais 0.91-2 and corosync 0.92.2 get > installed initially as

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker on Fedora 10 -- OpenAIS/Corosync version question

2009-04-09 Thread Ty! Boyack
Thanks Andrew! I have been using that install page from the wiki quite a bit. The difficulty I'm running into stems from rpm package dependencies. With our package set in fedora openais 0.91-2 and corosync 0.92.2 get installed initially as dependencies to other packages. That prevents me fr

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker on Fedora 10 -- OpenAIS/Corosync version question

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 20:54, Ty! Boyack wrote: > I'm trying to get Pacemaker running on a set of Fedora 10 boxes, but > I've seen some conflicting/confusing information regarding the state of > Pacemaker and how it integrates with OpenAIS/Corosync. > > It looks like the ha-clustering repo (at Sus

[Pacemaker] Pacemaker on Fedora 10 -- OpenAIS/Corosync version question

2009-04-08 Thread Ty! Boyack
I'm trying to get Pacemaker running on a set of Fedora 10 boxes, but I've seen some conflicting/confusing information regarding the state of Pacemaker and how it integrates with OpenAIS/Corosync. It looks like the ha-clustering repo (at Suse) uses the pre-Corosync version of OpenAIS (0.80.3-12),