On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Emmanuel Lesouef e.leso...@crbn.fr wrote:
Le Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:56:31 +0100,
Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@multinet.de a écrit :
Am Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 14:48:12 schrieb Emmanuel Lesouef:
Hi,
We use a rather old (in fact, very old) combination :
On 2010-01-18 11:18, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Biggest caveat is the networking issue that makes pacemaker 1.0
wire-incompatible with pacemaker 0.6 (and heartbeat 2.1.x).
So rolling upgrades are out and you'd need to look at one of the other
upgrade strategies.
Even though I've bugged you about
Unless there are violent objections, I plan to officially stop supporting 0.6
at the end of February.
Since I've not seeing any bugs reported for some time, it seems that anyone
still using 0.6 is happy with it for their workload.
Also, 1.0 has been out for over a year now and contains
Am Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 14:48:12 schrieb Emmanuel Lesouef:
Hi,
We use a rather old (in fact, very old) combination :
heartbeat 2.99 + openhpi 2.12
What do you suggest in order to upgrade to the latest version of
pacemaker ?
Thanks.
http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Upgrade
--
Dr.
