On 06/27/2013 11:45 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-27T11:32:36, Digimer wrote:
>
time and I expect many users will run into this problem as they try to
migrate to RHEL 7. I see no reason why this can't be properly handled in
pacemaker directly.
>>> Yes, why not, choice
On 2013-06-27T11:32:36, Digimer wrote:
> >> time and I expect many users will run into this problem as they try to
> >> migrate to RHEL 7. I see no reason why this can't be properly handled in
> >> pacemaker directly.
> > Yes, why not, choice is a good thing ;-)
> If an established configuration
On 06/27/2013 11:08 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-06-27T10:56:40, Digimer wrote:
>
>> However, this feels like a really bad solution. It's not uncommon to
>> have two separate power rails feeding either side of the node's PSUs.
>> Particularly in HA environments.
>
> True. But gating t
On 2013-06-27T10:56:40, Digimer wrote:
> However, this feels like a really bad solution. It's not uncommon to
> have two separate power rails feeding either side of the node's PSUs.
> Particularly in HA environments.
True. But gating them through the same power switch is *not* a SPoF from
the cl
On 2013-06-27T16:52:02, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > I don't want the cluster stack to start on boot, so I disable
> > pacemaker/corosync. However, I do want the node to power back on so that
> > I can log into it when the alarms go off. Yes, I could log into the good
> > node, manually unfence/b
On 06/27/2013 10:52 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:54:13AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
>> On 06/27/2013 07:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:52:00PM -0400, Digimer wrote:
This question appears to be the same issue asked here:
>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:54:13AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 07:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:52:00PM -0400, Digimer wrote:
> >> This question appears to be the same issue asked here:
> >>
> >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/
On 06/27/2013 07:02 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:52:00PM -0400, Digimer wrote:
>> This question appears to be the same issue asked here:
>>
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2013-June/018650.html
>>
>> In my case, I have two fence methods per no
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:52:00PM -0400, Digimer wrote:
> This question appears to be the same issue asked here:
>
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2013-June/018650.html
>
> In my case, I have two fence methods per node; IPMI first with
> action="reboot" and, if that fails,
This question appears to be the same issue asked here:
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/2013-June/018650.html
In my case, I have two fence methods per node; IPMI first with
action="reboot" and, if that fails, two PDUs (one backing each side of
the node's redundant PSUs).
Initially
10 matches
Mail list logo
