On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Javen Wu wrote:
> Thanks Beekhof for answering my question.
> I don't mean it matters. I just feel confuse why the function seems
> redundant when I tried to understand the code of pacemaker ;)
>
> I understand the CIB should be workable without CRMD around. But is
Thanks Beekhof for answering my question.
I don't mean it matters. I just feel confuse why the function seems
redundant when I tried to understand the code of pacemaker ;)
I understand the CIB should be workable without CRMD around. But is CRMD
dependant on the CIB? I think the answer is "yes".
Si
It allows the CIB to function without the CRMD around.
Why do you think it matters?
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Javen Wu wrote:
> Hi Beekhof & Lars,
>
> I found actually both Pacemaker CRMD and CIB are all clients of Heartbeat
> CCM. And I think CRMD would update the crm_node information on
Hi Beekhof & Lars,
I found actually both Pacemaker CRMD and CIB are all clients of Heartbeat
CCM. And I think CRMD would update the crm_node information once ccm
membership status change which reflect to CIB update eventually.
Why CIB register itself as client still? Seems what cib_ccm_msg_callb
