Yesterday, the last few emails between Vadym and I were inadvertently
not posted to this list. Here are those posts for anyone having
similar issues.
Regards,
Craig.
On 7 October 2010 15:20, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
> no, default is 0 - it is not taken into consideration at all.
> Resource stays in
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Craig Hurley wrote:
> I tried using ping instead of pingd and I added "number" to the
> evaluation, I get the same results :/
>
> primitive p_ping ocf:pacemaker:ping params host_list=172.20.0.254
> clone c_ping p_ping meta globally-unique=false
> location loc_ping
On Oct 6, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Craig Hurley wrote:
> I tried using ping instead of pingd and I added "number" to the
> evaluation, I get the same results :/
>
> primitive p_ping ocf:pacemaker:ping params host_list=172.20.0.254
> clone c_ping p_ping meta globally-unique=false
> location loc_ping g_c
I tried using ping instead of pingd and I added "number" to the
evaluation, I get the same results :/
primitive p_ping ocf:pacemaker:ping params host_list=172.20.0.254
clone c_ping p_ping meta globally-unique=false
location loc_ping g_cluster_services rule -inf: not_defined p_ping or
p_ping number
On Oct 6, 2010, at 3:43 AM, Jayakrishnan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Guess the change:--
> location loc_pingd g_cluster_services rule -inf: not_defined pingd or pingd
> number:lte 0
>
> should work
>
>
>
ocf:pacemaker:ping is recommended as a replacement for pingd RA
Both RA define node a
Hello,
Guess the change:--
location loc_pingd g_cluster_services rule -inf: not_defined pingd or
pingdnumber:lte 0
should work
--
Regards,
Jayakrishnan. L
Visit:
www.foralllinux.blogspot.com
www.jayakrishnan.bravehost.com
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Claus Denk wrote:
> I am having
I am having a similar problem, so let's wait for the experts, But in the
meanwhile, try changing
location loc_pingd g_cluster_services rule -inf: not_defined p_pingd
or p_pingd lte 0
to
location loc_pingd g_cluster_services rule -inf: not_defined pingd
or pingd number:lte 0
and see what happ
Hello,
I have a 2 node cluster, running DRBD, heartbeat and pacemaker in
active/passive mode. On both nodes, eth0 is connected to the main
network, eth1 is used to connect the nodes directly to each other.
The nodes share a virtual IP address on eth0. Pacemaker is also
controlling a custom servi
