Re: [Pacemaker] pengine self-maintenance

2010-05-19 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On May 17, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: You don't want to set it that low. PE input files are part of your cluster history. Set it to a few thousand. What could be the side-backs of having it too low? How are these files being used? And shouldn't be some reasonable default

Re: [Pacemaker] pengine self-maintenance

2010-05-19 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:13:28AM -0400, Vadym Chepkov wrote: On May 17, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: You don't want to set it that low. PE input files are part of your cluster history. Set it to a few thousand. What could be the side-backs of having it too

Re: [Pacemaker] pengine self-maintenance

2010-05-19 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fmwrote: And shouldn't be some reasonable default be in place? I just happened to notice 90% inode utilization on my /var, some could be not so lucky. Yes, that could be a problem. Perhaps that default could be changed

Re: [Pacemaker] pengine self-maintenance

2010-05-17 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I noticed pengine (pacemaker-1.0.8-6.el5) creates quite a lot of files in /var/lib/pengine, especially when cluster-recheck-interval is set to enable failure-timeout checks. pengine metadata | grep series-max

Re: [Pacemaker] pengine self-maintenance

2010-05-17 Thread Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]
On 05/17/2010 08:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I noticed pengine (pacemaker-1.0.8-6.el5) creates quite a lot of files in /var/lib/pengine, especially when cluster-recheck-interval is set to enable failure-timeout

Re: [Pacemaker] pengine self-maintenance

2010-05-17 Thread Vadym Chepkov
On May 17, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I noticed pengine (pacemaker-1.0.8-6.el5) creates quite a lot of files in /var/lib/pengine, especially when cluster-recheck-interval is set to enable

Re: [Pacemaker] pengine self-maintenance

2010-05-17 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 06:56:00AM -0400, Vadym Chepkov wrote: On May 17, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I noticed pengine (pacemaker-1.0.8-6.el5) creates quite a lot of files in

Re: [Pacemaker] pengine self-maintenance

2010-05-17 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote: On May 17, 2010, at 2:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I noticed pengine (pacemaker-1.0.8-6.el5) creates quite a lot of files in

[Pacemaker] pengine self-maintenance

2010-05-15 Thread Vadym Chepkov
Hi I noticed pengine (pacemaker-1.0.8-6.el5) creates quite a lot of files in /var/lib/pengine, especially when cluster-recheck-interval is set to enable failure-timeout checks. /var/lib/heartbeat/crm/ seems also growing unattended. Does pacemaker do any self-maintenance or it will cause system