Re: [Pacemaker] sbd fencing race

2014-11-26 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:20:32PM +0100, emmanuel segura wrote: Hi list, The last night, i had a cluster in fencing race using sbd as stonith Can you give a bit more details. device, i would like to know what is the effect to use start-delay in my stonith resource in this way:

Re: [Pacemaker] sbd fencing race

2014-11-26 Thread emmanuel segura
But i would like to know if pacemaker needs to start sbd on the node where sbd resource isnt running to fence the other nodes, because i don't see any start action in the second node:

Re: [Pacemaker] sbd fencing race

2014-11-26 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:13:41AM +0100, emmanuel segura wrote: But i would like to know if pacemaker needs to start sbd on the node where sbd resource isnt running to fence the other nodes, because i don't see any start action in the second node: That's strange. I'd expect that a stonith

Re: [Pacemaker] sbd fencing race

2014-11-26 Thread emmanuel segura
I think pacemaker doesn't care about the sbd resource status when it needs to make a fencing call, that what i think, but i hope some one, will give me some more information. Thanks 2014-11-26 15:11 GMT+01:00 Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:13:41AM +0100,

[Pacemaker] sbd fencing race

2014-11-25 Thread emmanuel segura
Hi list, The last night, i had a cluster in fencing race using sbd as stonith device, i would like to know what is the effect to use start-delay in my stonith resource in this way: primitive stonith-sbd stonith:external/sbd \ params sbd_device=/dev/mapper/SBD \ op start