On 27 May 2014, at 3:45 pm, K Mehta wrote:
> No reason. Need to know which combination is expected to work.
The bets approach is to update both. That combination is sure to work.
> using 0.9.26 with new 1.1.10 pacemaker
> and 0.9.90 with old pacemaker has issues in resource deletion.
>
> Bel
No reason. Need to know which combination is expected to work.
using 0.9.26 with new 1.1.10 pacemaker
and 0.9.90 with old pacemaker has issues in resource deletion.
Below is the commands executed on 0.9.26 with 1.1.10 pacemaker
[root@vsanqa11 tmp]# rpm -qa | grep pcs; rpm -qa | grep pacemaker; rp
On 27 May 2014, at 2:34 pm, K Mehta wrote:
> I have seen that 0.9.26 works with 1.1.8 pacemaker and 0.9.90 works with
> 1.1.10 pacemaker.
> However, with 0.9.90 pcs and 1.1.8 pacemaker, pcs delete resource resource name> fails with error CIB update failed because of schema error
Any specific
I have seen that 0.9.26 works with 1.1.8 pacemaker and 0.9.90 works with
1.1.10 pacemaker.
However, with 0.9.90 pcs and 1.1.8 pacemaker, pcs delete resource
fails with error CIB update failed because of
schema error
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:28 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 26 May 2014, at
On 26 May 2014, at 5:15 pm, K Mehta wrote:
> pcs versions 0.9.26 and 0.9.90
> pacemaker versions 1.1.8 and 1.1.10
>
> Which pcs versions are expected to work with which pacemaker versions ?
I think for the most part, all versions will work together.
There may be the odd command that requires a
pcs versions 0.9.26 and 0.9.90
pacemaker versions 1.1.8 and 1.1.10
Which pcs versions are expected to work with which pacemaker versions ?
Regards,
Kiran
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/list
