On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 08:24 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:25 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
...
Remaining
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 16:15 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5
I had 1.1 but Dejan asked my to rebase my patches on devel.
So long story short: devel now works after upgrading to the rev you
mentioned and I got back to working on my patches.
Thanx
Holger
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 10:58 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I thought you said you were running 1.1?
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 13:25 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
...
Remaining diffs seem to be not related to my changes.
Unlikely I'm afraid. We run the regression tests after every commit
and complain loudly
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:03 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:41 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Unfortunately
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 09:41 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Unfortunately the devel code does not run at all in my environment so I
have to fix this first.
Oh? I ran CTS on it the other day and it was fine here.
I installed pacemaker-devel on top of a compilation of pacemaker-1.1. In
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 17:58 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:31:33PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
why?
CMD_ERR(Resource %s not moved:
specifying --master
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 20:50 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
why?
CMD_ERR(Resource %s not moved:
specifying --master is not supported for
--move-from\n, rsc_id);
it did not look sensible to me but I can't recall the exact reasons 8-)
It's now implemented.
also the
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 12:33 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
New syntax:
---
crm_resource --move-from --resource myresource --node mynode
- all resource variants: check whether active on mynode, then create
standby constraint
crm_resource --move-from --resource
Hi,
during work on the move-XXX stuff I discovered this.
Regards
Holger
# HG changeset patch
# User Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
# Date 1302259903 -7200
# Branch mig
# Node ID caed31174dc966450a31da048b640201980870a8
# Parent 9451c288259b7b9fd6f32f5df01d47569e570c58
Low: lib/common
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 08:57 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:38 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:36PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 15:38 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:00:36PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
wrote:
Ah, right, sorry, wanted to ask about the difference between
move-off and move. The
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 21:31 +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 15:24 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:05 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55 AM
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 13:40 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:19:56PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 12:27 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Holger Teutsch wrote
Hi Dejan,
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 16:11 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:55:57AM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:24 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:21:40PM +0100, Holger Teutsch
to work on clones
and/or should moving the master role be the default for m/s resources
and the --master option discarded ?
Regards
Holger
# HG changeset patch
# User Holger Teutsch holger.teut...@web.de
# Date 1300439791 -3600
# Branch mig
# Node ID dac1a4eae844f0bd857951b1154a171c80c25772
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 14:21 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 09:12:46AM -0500, David McCurley wrote:
Are you wanting to move all the resources back or just that one resource?
I'm still learning, but one simple way I move all resources back from nodeb
to
Hi Dejan,
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:14 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:58:02PM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:00 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
In order to show the intention of the arguments
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 19:26 +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 12:07 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:15:01AM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 13:06 +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Thu
Hi Dejan,
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:00 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
This would become:
for p in all_obj_list: # passed from _verify()
if is_primitive(p.node):
+process_primitive(p.node, clash_dict)
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 13:06 +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 10:55 +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
On 2011-03-03 10:43, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi,
I submit a patch for
bugzilla 2541: Shell should warn if parameter uniqueness is violated
for discussion.
I'll leave
Hi Dejan,
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 12:07 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi Holger,
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:15:01AM +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 13:06 +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 10:55 +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
On 2011-03-03 10:43, Holger
to ensure that any attachment to this e-mail has been swept
for virus. However, KNAPP does not accept any liability for damage
sustained as a result of such attachment being virus infected and
strongly recommend that you carry out your own virus check before
opening any attachment.
Holger Teutsch
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 12:40 +0100, patrik.rappo...@knapp.com wrote:
Hi,
assume the basic problem is in your raid configuration.
If you unmap one box the devices should not be in status FAIL but in
degraded.
So what is the exit status of
mdadm --detail --test /dev/md0
after unmapping ?
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 10:55 +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
On 2011-03-03 10:43, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi,
I submit a patch for
bugzilla 2541: Shell should warn if parameter uniqueness is violated
for discussion.
I'll leave it do Dejan to review the code, but I love the functionality
Hi,
I submit a patch for
bugzilla 2541: Shell should warn if parameter uniqueness is violated
for discussion.
devel1:~ # crm configure
crm(live)configure# primitive ip1a ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 params ip=1.2.3.4
meta target-role=stopped
crm(live)configure# primitive ip1b ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2
At least for Opensuse 11.3 x86_64. May be the title of my previous mail
was misleading.
-h
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 17:57 +0100, Holger Teutsch wrote:
Hi,
the packages from rpm-next(64bit) for opensuse 11.3 do not install there (at
least true for 1.1.4 and 1.1.5).
The plugin is in
./usr/lib
Hi,
the packages from rpm-next(64bit) for opensuse 11.3 do not install there (at
least true for 1.1.4 and 1.1.5).
The plugin is in
./usr/lib/lcrso/pacemaker.lcrso
but should be in
./usr/lib64/lcrso/pacemaker.lcrso
I think the patch below (borrowed from the 'official' packages) cures.
Regards
On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 17:10 +0100, Christoph Herrmann wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm
Gesendet: Fr 14.01.2011 12:31
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org;
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Howto write a STONITH
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 10:21 +0100, Christoph Herrmann wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net
Gesendet: Di 11.01.2011 09:01
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org;
CC: Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@clusterbau.com;
The resource failed when the sleep expired, i.e. each 600 secs.
Now I changed the resource to
sleep 7200, failure-timeout 3600
i.e. to values far beyond the recheck-interval opf 15m.
Now everything behaves as expected.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Holger Teutsch
From
be obtained and
the other one could not be obtained on a different node
IMHO sdb is not an alternative as this introduces a SPOF.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Holger Teutsch
From: Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
pacemaker
Hi,
I observed the following in pacemaker Versions 1.1.3 and tip up to patch
10258.
In a small test environment to study fail-count behavior I have one
resource
anything
doing sleep 600 with monitoring interval 10 secs.
The failure-timeout is 300.
I would expect to never see a failcount
33 matches
Mail list logo
