17.07.2015 10:46, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
[...]
The attribute is not listed in the PE meta-data and therefore
considered an error. You can make crmsh less strict like this:
# crm option set core.check_mode relaxed
It'll still print the error, but your changes are going to be
committed.
19.05.2015 11:46, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:34:38PM +0300, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
18.05.2015 18:57, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi Vladislav,
Isn't that a bind-mount?
nope, but your question lead me to possible culprit..
it's cephfs mount, when I try to some local
19.05.2015 11:44, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:14:14PM +0200, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi Dejan,
The list below seems too extensive. Which version of
resource-agents do you run?
$ grep 'Build version:' /usr/lib/ocf/lib/heartbeat/ocf-shellfuncs
yes, it's definitely
18.05.2015 18:57, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi Vladislav,
Isn't that a bind-mount?
nope, but your question lead me to possible culprit..
it's cephfs mount, when I try to some local filesystem, I don't
see this weird fuser behaviour..
so maybe fuser does not work correctly on cephfs?
yep, for
18.05.2015 13:20, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
Hi,
I noticed very annoying bug (or so I think), that resource-agents-3.9.5
in RHEL / centos 6 Filesystem OCF resource seems to be killing completely
unrelated processes on shutdown although they're not using anything on mounted
filesystem...
Isn't
17.04.2015 00:48, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 22 Jan 2015, at 12:04 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
20.01.2015 02:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 16 Jan 2015, at 3:59 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
16.01.2015 07:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15 Jan 2015
23.02.2015 21:50, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
On 14 Feb 2015, at 1:10 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
Hi,
I believe that is a bug that 'stop' operation uses set of instance
attributes from the original 'start' op, not what successful 'reload' had
24.02.2015 01:58, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jan 2015, at 5:08 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
21.01.2015 03:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 20 Jan 2015, at 4:13 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 17 Jan 2015
Hi,
I believe that is a bug that 'stop' operation uses set of instance
attributes from the original 'start' op, not what successful 'reload' had.
Corresponding pe-input has correct set of attributes, and pre-stop
'notify' op uses updated set of attributes too.
This is easily reproducible with
Hi,
is there a way for resource agent to tell pacemaker that in some cases
reload operation is insufficient to apply new resource definition and
restart is required?
I tried to return OCF_ERR_GENERIC, but that prevents resource from being
started until failure-timeout lapses and cluster is
Hi,
Playing with two-week old git master on a two-node cluster I discovered
that only limited set of notify operations is performed for clone and
master-slave instances when all of them are being started/stopped.
Clones (anonymous):
* post-start
* pre-stop
M/S:
* post-start
* post-promote
*
Hi Dejan,
if it is not too late, would it be possible to add output of environment
into resource trace file when tracing is enabled?
--- ocf-shellfuncs.orig 2015-01-26 15:50:34.435001364 +
+++ ocf-shellfuncs 2015-01-26 15:49:19.707001542 +
@@ -822,6 +822,7 @@
fi
Hi,
21.01.2015 12:50, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
Hello,
renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp writes:
Hi All,
We confirmed a function of crmsh by the next combination.
* corosync-2.3.4
* pacemaker-Pacemaker-1.1.12
* crmsh-2.1.0
By new crmsh, does options sort-elements no not work?
Is there the
20.01.2015 02:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 16 Jan 2015, at 3:59 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
16.01.2015 07:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15 Jan 2015, at 3:11 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
13.01.2015 11:32, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13
21.01.2015 03:51, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 20 Jan 2015, at 4:13 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 17 Jan 2015, at 1:25 am, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi all,
Trying to reproduce problem with early stop
20.01.2015 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 17 Jan 2015, at 1:25 am, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi all,
Trying to reproduce problem with early stop of globally-unique
clone instances during move to another node I found one more
interesting problem.
Due to the different
Hi all,
Trying to reproduce problem with early stop of globally-unique clone
instances during move to another node I found one more interesting
problem.
Due to the different order of resources in the CIB and extensive use of
constraints between other resources (odd number of resources
16.01.2015 07:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15 Jan 2015, at 3:11 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
13.01.2015 11:32, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi Andrew, David, all.
I found a little bit strange
;
+
} else if (child_rsc-fns-active(child_rsc, TRUE)) {
/* Fully active anonymous clone */
node_t *location = child_rsc-fns-location(child_rsc, NULL,
TRUE);
On 10 Jan 2015, at 12:16 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi all,
It seems like lib
13.01.2015 11:32, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi Andrew, David, all.
I found a little bit strange operation ordering during transition execution.
Could you please look at the following partial configuration (crmsh
Hi Andrew, David, all.
I found a little bit strange operation ordering during transition execution.
Could you please look at the following partial configuration (crmsh syntax)?
===
...
clone cl-broker broker \
meta interleave=true target-role=Started
clone cl-broker-vips broker-vips \
Hi all,
It seems like lib/pengine/clone.c/clone_print() doesn't respect pending
state of clone/ms resource instances in the cumulative output:
short_print(list_text, child_text, rsc-variant == pe_master ?
Slaves : Started, options,
print_data);
in by-node output
03.01.2015 20:35, Dmitry Koterov wrote:
Hello.
Ubuntu 14.04, corosync 2.3.3, pacemaker 1.1.10. The cluster consists of
2 nodes (node1 and node2), when I run crm node standby node2 and then,
in a minute, crm node online node2, DRBD secondary on node2 does not
start. Logs say that drbdadm -c
25.11.2014 23:41, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi!
is subj implemented?
Trying echo c /proc/sysrq-trigger on remote nodes and no fencing occurs.
Yes, fencing remote-nodes works. Are you certain your fencing devices can handle
fencing the remote-node? Fencing a
26.11.2014 14:21, Daniel Dehennin wrote:
Daniel Dehennin daniel.dehen...@baby-gnu.org writes:
I'll try find how to make the change directly in XML.
Ok, looking at git history this feature seems only available on master
branch and not yet released.
I do not have that feature on my
26.11.2014 18:36, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
25.11.2014 23:41, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi!
is subj implemented?
Trying echo c /proc/sysrq-trigger on remote nodes and no fencing occurs.
Yes, fencing remote-nodes works. Are you certain
25.11.2014 12:54, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:...
OK, let's switch tracks a bit. What *topics* do we actually have? Can we
fill two days? Where would we want to collect them?
Just my 2c.
- It would be interesting to get some bird-view information
on what C APIs corosync and pacemaker currently
27.11.2014 03:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 25 Nov 2014, at 10:37 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any information how watchdog integration is intended to work?
What are currently-evaluated use-cases for that?
It seems to be forcibly disabled id SBD
Hi!
is subj implemented?
Trying echo c /proc/sysrq-trigger on remote nodes and no fencing occurs.
Best,
Vladislav
___
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home:
Hi,
Is there any information how watchdog integration is intended to work?
What are currently-evaluated use-cases for that?
It seems to be forcibly disabled id SBD is not detected...
Also, is there any way to make node (in one-node cluster ;) ) to suicide
if it detects fencing is required?
25.11.2014 23:36, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
Daniel Dehennin daniel.dehen...@baby-gnu.org writes:
Hello,
Hello,
I have a 4 nodes cluster and some resources are only installed on 2 of
them.
I set cluster asymmetry and infinity location:
primitive Mysqld
20.11.2014 01:57, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
On 19 Nov 2014, at 4:27 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi all,
just an observation.
I have a globally-unique clone with 50 instances in a cluster consisting
of one cluster node and 3 remote bare-metal nodes.
When I run
20.11.2014 09:25, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
On 20 Nov 2014, at 5:12 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
20.11.2014 01:57, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
On 19 Nov 2014, at 4:27 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
Hi all,
just an observation.
I have a globally-unique
Hi all,
just an observation.
I have a globally-unique clone with 50 instances in a cluster consisting
of one cluster node and 3 remote bare-metal nodes.
When I run crm_resource -C -r 'g_u_clone' (crmsh does that for me),
it writes that it expects to receive 50 answers (although it writes 4
lines
Hi David, all,
I'm trying to get resource-discovery=never working with cd7c9ab, but still
get Not installed probe failures from nodes which does not have
corresponding resource agents installed.
The only difference in my location constraints comparing to what is committed
in #589
is that they
12.11.2014 22:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi David, all,
I'm trying to get resource-discovery=never working with cd7c9ab, but still
get Not installed probe failures from nodes which does not have
corresponding resource agents installed.
The only difference in my location constraints
12.11.2014 22:57, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
12.11.2014 22:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi David, all,
I'm trying to get resource-discovery=never working with cd7c9ab, but
still
get Not installed probe failures from nodes which does not have
corresponding
11.11.2014 07:27, Sihan Goi wrote:
Hi,
DocumentRoot is still set to /var/www/html
ls -al /var/www/html shows different things on the 2 nodes
node01:
total 28
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Nov 11 12:25 .
drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root 4096 Jul 23 22:18 ..
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root50 Oct 28
23.10.2014 22:39, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
21.10.2014 06:25, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
21.10.2014 05:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 20 Oct 2014, at 8:52 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
Hi Andrew, David, all,
It seems like #kind was introduced
21.10.2014 06:25, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
21.10.2014 05:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 20 Oct 2014, at 8:52 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi Andrew, David, all,
It seems like #kind was introduced before bare-metal remote node
support, and now it is matched against
Hi Andrew, David, all,
It seems like #kind was introduced before bare-metal remote node
support, and now it is matched against cluster and container.
Bare-metal remote nodes match container (they are remote), but
strictly speaking they are not containers.
Could/should that attribute be extended
21.10.2014 05:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 20 Oct 2014, at 8:52 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi Andrew, David, all,
It seems like #kind was introduced before bare-metal remote node
support, and now it is matched against cluster and container.
Bare-metal remote nodes
: [ node01 node02 ]
Thank you,
Norbert
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com mailto:bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
12.09.2014 05:00, Norbert Kiam Maclang wrote:
Hi,
After adding resource level fencing on drbd, I still ended up having
11.09.2014 05:57, Norbert Kiam Maclang wrote:
Is this something to do with quorum? But I already set
You'd need to configure fencing at the drbd resources level.
http://www.drbd.org/users-guide-emb/s-pacemaker-fencing.html#s-pacemaker-fencing-cib
property no-quorum-policy=ignore \
(restarting both nodes alternately
- this always works). Will wait for a couple of hours after doing a
failover test again (Which always fail on my previous setup).
Thank you!
Kiam
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com mailto:bub
14.08.2014 10:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
The load from the crmd is mostly from talking to the lrmd, which is
dependant on resource placement rather than being (or not being) the DC.
I've seen the different picture with 1024 unique clone instances. crmd's
CPU load on DC is much higher
14.08.2014 05:24, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 14 Aug 2014, at 12:05 am, Lars Ellenberg lars.ellenb...@linbit.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:33:55AM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 13 Aug 2014, at 2:02 am, Cédric Dufour - Idiap Research Institute
cedric.duf...@idiap.ch wrote:
On
25.07.2014 02:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:00 pm, Arjun Pandey apandepub...@gmail.com
wrote:
Right. Actually the issue i am facing is that i am starting the
pacemaker service remotely from a wrapper and thus pacemakerd dies
when the wrapper exits.nohup solves the
24.07.2014 03:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 2:46 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
23.07.2014 05:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:45 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jul 2014
23.07.2014 05:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:45 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15 Jul 2014
21.07.2014 13:37, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:09 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
21.07.2014 06:21, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 18 Jul 2014, at 5:16 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi Andrew, all,
I have a task which seems to be easily
21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Arjun Pandey apandepub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:00 pm, Arjun Pandey apandepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Right. Actually the issue i am
21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Arjun Pandey apandepub...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Beekhof
Hi Andrew, all,
I have a task which seems to be easily solvable with the use of
globally-unique clone: start huge number of specific virtual machines to
provide a load to a connection multiplexer.
I decided to look how pacemaker behaves in such setup with Dummy
resource agent, and found that
digest...
Today's Topics:
1. Re: crm resourse (lsb:apache2) not starting (Michael Monette)
2. Re: crm resourse (lsb:apache2) not starting (W Forum W)
3. Re: crm resourse (lsb:apache2) not starting (Vladislav Bogdanov
08.07.2014 16:15, W Forum W wrote:
Hi,
I have a two node cluster with a DRBD, heartbeat and pacemaker (on
Debian Wheezy)
The cluster is working fine. 2 DRBD resources, Shared IP, 2 File systems
and a postgresql database start, stop, migrate, ... correctly.
Now the problem is with the
30.06.2014 15:45, Tony Atkinson wrote:
Hi all,
I'd really appreciate a helping hand here
I'm so close to getting what I need, but just seem to be falling short
at the last hurdle.
2-node active/active cluster serving virtual machines (KVM via libvirt)
Virtual machines need to be able to
11.06.2014 16:26, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
Hi guys,
I am trying to deal somehow with split brain situation in 2 node cluster
using votequorum.
Here is a quorum section in my corosync.conf:
provider: corosync_votequorum
expected_votes: 2
Just a side note, not an answer to your
02.05.2014 03:47, ESWAR RAO wrote:
Hi All,
I am working on 3 node cluster with corosync+pacemaker on RHEL 6.
Eventhough I applied anti-affinity the app is still trying to run on 3rd
node.
# rpm -qa|grep corosync
corosync-1.4.1-17.el6_5.1.x86_64
corosynclib-1.4.1-17.el6_5.1.x86_64
# rpm
23.04.2014 13:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I'd like to get a release out in the next month or so, so expect a release
candidate RealSoonNow(tm).
The last item on my personal todo list is updating the ACL syntax to make the
terms a little more generic (since it won't just be users anymore).
12.03.2014 00:40, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 11 Mar 2014, at 6:23 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
07.03.2014 10:30, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
07.03.2014 05:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 10:39 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
wrote:
18.02.2014
07.03.2014 10:30, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
07.03.2014 05:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 10:39 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida yusk.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I measure
12.03.2014 00:37, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
I'm somewhat confused at this point if crmsh is using --replace, then why
is it doing diff calculations?
Or are replace operations only for the load operation?
It uses on of two methods depending on pacemaker version.
18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida yusk.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I measure the performance of Pacemaker in the following combinations.
Pacemaker-1.1.11.rc1
libqb-0.16.0
corosync-2.3.2
All nodes are KVM virtual machines.
stopped the
07.03.2014 05:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 10:39 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida yusk.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I measure the performance of Pacemaker in the following
21.02.2014 13:45, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2014-02-21T13:02:23, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
It could be nice feature to have kind of general SLA concept (it could
be very similar to the utilization one from the resource configuration
perspective), so resources try
Hi Fabio,
19.02.2014 12:32, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
On 2/19/2014 9:39 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
On 2/18/2014 9:24 PM, Asgaroth wrote:
Just a guess. Do you have startup fencing enabled in dlm-controld (I
actually
do not remember if it is applicable to cman's version, but it exists in
29.01.2014 08:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
Thats a known deficiency in the v1 diff format (and why we need costly
digests to detect ordering changes).
Happily .12 will have a new and improve diff format that will handle this
correctly.
Does your recent cib-performance rewrite address
17.02.2014 04:11, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 11 Feb 2014, at 2:49 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi,
cannot find anywhere (am I blind?), is it possible to manually inject
'reload' op for a given resource?
Background for this is if some configuration files are edited
18.02.2014 03:49, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 31 Jan 2014, at 6:20 pm, yusuke iida yusk.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all
I measure the performance of Pacemaker in the following combinations.
Pacemaker-1.1.11.rc1
libqb-0.16.0
corosync-2.3.2
All nodes are KVM virtual machines.
stopped the
18.02.2014 19:49, Asgaroth wrote:
i sometimes have the same situation. sleep ~30 seconds between startup
cman and clvmd helps a lot.
Thanks for the tip, I just tried this (added sleep 30 in the start
section of case statement in cman script, but this did not resolve the
issue for me), for
18.02.2014 23:01, David Vossel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com To:
pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014
1:02:09 PM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] node1 fencing itself after
node2 being fenced
18.02.2014 19:49
10.02.2014 14:46, Asgaroth wrote:
Hi All,
OK, here is my testing using cman/clvmd enabled on system startup and
clvmd outside of pacemaker control. I still seem to be getting the clvmd
hang/fail situation even when running outside of pacemaker control, I
cannot see off-hand where the
Hi,
cannot find anywhere (am I blind?), is it possible to manually inject
'reload' op for a given resource?
Background for this is if some configuration files are edited, and
resource-agent (or LSB script) supports 'reload' operation, then it
would be nice to have a way to request that reload to
10.02.2014 18:54, Asgaroth wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vladislav Bogdanov [mailto:bub...@hoster-ok.com]
Sent: 10 February 2014 13:27
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] node1 fencing itself after node2 being fenced
I cannot really recall
07.02.2014 14:22, Asgaroth wrote:
...
Thanks for the explanation, this is interresting for me as I need a
volume manager in the cluster to manager the shared file systems in case
I need to resize for some reason. I think I may be coming up against
something similar now that I am testing cman
05.02.2014 20:10, Asgaroth wrote:
On 05/02/2014 16:12, Digimer wrote:
You say it's working now? If so, excellent. If you have any troubles
though, please share your cluster.conf and 'pcs config show'.
Hi Digimer, no its not working as I expect it to when I test a crash of
node 2, clvmd
Hi all,
Just discovered, that when I add resource to a middle of
(running) group, it is added to the end.
I mean, if I update following (crmsh syntax)
group dhcp-server vip-10-5-200-244 dhcpd
with
group dhcp-server vip-10-5-200-244 vip-10-5-201-244 dhcpd
with 'crm configure load update',
Hi,
This is the only one message I see in logs in otherwise static cluster
(with rechecks enabled), probably it is good idea to downgrade it to info.
diff --git a/lib/pengine/unpack.c b/lib/pengine/unpack.c
index 97e114f..6dbcf19 100644
--- a/lib/pengine/unpack.c
+++ b/lib/pengine/unpack.c
@@
10.01.2014 08:00, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 10 Jan 2014, at 3:51 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
10.01.2014, 03:28, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On 9 Jan 2014, at 4:44 pm, Andrey Groshev gre...@yandex.ru wrote:
09.01.2014, 02:39, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net:
On
02.01.2014 12:53, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote:
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 14:41:20 +0300
Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
I would expect that only one option is modified, but crmsh intend to
remove all others.
May be it is possible to fix it by one-line crmsh patch?
Kristoffer
03.01.2014 07:46, Digimer wrote:
Hi all,
While trying to test to answer questions from my previous thread, I
hit another problem. Since posting the first thread, I moved on in the
Cluster from Scratch tutorial and got to the point where I was running
Active/Active.
Here I have a
27.12.2013 09:34, Digimer wrote:
...
3. I know I mentioned this on IRC before, but I thought I should mention
it here again. In the pcs CfS, it shows to set:
Location /server-status
SetHandler server-status
Order deny,allow
Deny from all
Allow from 127.0.0.1
/Location
27.12.2013 09:45, Digimer wrote:
On 27/12/13 01:44 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
27.12.2013 09:34, Digimer wrote:
...
3. I know I mentioned this on IRC before, but I thought I should mention
it here again. In the pcs CfS, it shows to set:
Location /server-status
SetHandler server
20.12.2013 14:15, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi all,
Just discovered that it is possible to remove options in subject with
admin action (at least with cibadmin --patch).
This is notably annoying when updating CIB with 'crm configure load
update' (which uses crm_diff to create patch) when
Hi all,
Just discovered that it is possible to remove options in subject with
admin action (at least with cibadmin --patch).
This is notably annoying when updating CIB with 'crm configure load
update' (which uses crm_diff to create patch) when updating other
cluster options.
While most (all?)
18.12.2013 23:21, Rainer Brestan wrote:
Hi Lars,
maybe a little off topic.
What i really miss in crmsh is the possibility to specify resource
parameters which are different on different nodes, so the parameter is
node dependant.
In XML syntax this is existing, Andrew gave me the hint as
13.12.2013 15:39, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-12-13T13:11:30, Rainer Brestan rainer.bres...@gmx.net wrote:
Please do not merge colocation and order together in a way that only none or
both is present.
This was never the plan.
The idea was to offer an additional construct that
in latter two.
But I couldn't understand why pacemaker is giving errors with this type
of configuration.
Thanks
Eswar
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com
mailto:bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
06.12.2013 14:07, ESWAR RAO wrote:
Hi Vladislav
06.12.2013 19:13, James Oakley wrote:
On Thursday, December 5, 2013 9:55:47 PM Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Does 'db0' resolve to a correct IP address? If not, then you probably
want either fix that or use remote-addr option as well. I saw that you
can ping/ssh
...@gmail.com
mailto:eswar7...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Vladislav.
I will work on that.
Thanks
Eswar
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov
bub...@hoster-ok.com mailto:bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
06.12.2013 07:58, ESWAR RAO wrote:
Hi
06.12.2013 11:41, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-12-06T08:55:47, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
BTW, pacemaker cib accepts any meta attributes (and that is very
convenient way for me to store some 'meta' information), while crmsh
limits them to a pre-defined list. While
06.12.2013 07:58, ESWAR RAO wrote:
Hi All,
Can someone help me with below configuration??
I have a 3 node HB setup (node1, node2, node3) which runs HB+pacemaker.
I have 3 apps dummy1, dummy2 , dummy3 which needs to be run on only 2
nodes among the 3 nodes.
By using the below
05.12.2013 19:57, James Oakley wrote:
I have Pacemaker 1.1.10 cluster running on openSUSE 13.1 and I am
trying to get pacemaker-remote working so I can manage resources in LXC
containers. I have pacemaker_remoted running in the containers.
However, I can't seem to get crm configured to talk
28.11.2013 04:04, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
If you find yourself asking $subject at some point in the next couple of
months, the answer is that I'm taking leave to look after our new son (Lawson
Tiberius Beekhof) who was born on Tuesday.
I will be dropping in occasionally to see how things are
12.11.2013 09:56, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
...
Ah, then in_ccm will be set to false only when corosync (2) is stopped
on a node, not when pacemaker is stopped?
Thus, current drbd agent/fencing logic does not (well) support just stop
of pacemaker in my use-case, messaging layer should
11.11.2013 09:00, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
...
Looking at crm-fence-peer.sh script, it would determine peer state as
offline immediately if node state (all of)
* doesn't contain expected tag or has it set to down
* has in_ccm tag set to false
* has crmd tag set to anything except online
12.11.2013 03:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 10:29 am, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 2:46 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
11.11.2013 09:00, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
...
Looking at crm-fence-peer.sh script, it would
12.11.2013 03:15, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Can you try with these two patches please?
+ Andrew Beekhof (4 seconds ago) fec946a: Fix: crmd: When the DC gracefully
shuts down, record the new expected state into the cib (HEAD, master)
+ Andrew Beekhof (10 seconds ago) 740122a: Fix: crmd: When a
11.11.2013 02:30, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 5 Nov 2013, at 2:22 am, Vladislav Bogdanov bub...@hoster-ok.com wrote:
Hi Andrew, David, all,
Just found interesting fact, don't know is it a bug or not.
When doing service pacemaker stop on a node which has drbd resource
promoted
1 - 100 of 387 matches
Mail list logo
