On 2010-05-28 14:01, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
Hi,
I want to convert our home-made application to be managed by pacemaker
cluster.
The way it works now: application starts, discovers all IPs configured on the
system and if it sees preconfigured IP it becomes master and will serve
On May 28, 2010, at 8:12 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
On 2010-05-28 14:01, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
Hi,
I want to convert our home-made application to be managed by pacemaker
cluster.
The way it works now: application starts, discovers all IPs configured on
the system and if it sees
On 2010-05-28 14:20, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On May 28, 2010, at 8:12 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
On 2010-05-28 14:01, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
Hi,
I want to convert our home-made application to be managed by pacemaker
cluster.
The way it works now: application starts, discovers all IPs
On May 28, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
Imperative word was started. You think I still should go multi-state RA
for this application?
If the application which that RA applies to distinguishes between roles
equivalent to a Master and a Slave, and you want the RA to manage those,
On 05/28/2010 02:37 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On May 28, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
Imperative word was started. You think I still should go multi-state RA
for this application?
If the application which that RA applies to distinguishes between roles
equivalent to a Master and a
On May 28, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
On 05/28/2010 02:37 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On May 28, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Florian Haas wrote:
Imperative word was started. You think I still should go multi-state RA
for this application?
If the application which that RA applies to
So, application acts as master if it was able to bind to the pre-configured
IP and as a node if it wasn't. If it's a master it listens on an additional
port and receives updates from nodes. Each application pulls video feed out
of attached video cameras and stores them on the local drives,
