Hi,
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:15:10PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
--On Wednesday, October 27, 2010 09:47:14 AM +0200 Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a APC AP9606 PDU and I am trying to find a stonith agent which
works with that PDU.
I know that this is an old
--On Wednesday, October 27, 2010 09:47:14 AM +0200 Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a APC AP9606 PDU and I am trying to find a stonith agent which
works with that PDU.
I know that this is an old thread, but I'll reply anyway.
I have a one cluster that uses an old APC
On 17 November 2010 04:15, Devin Reade g...@gno.org wrote:
--On Wednesday, October 27, 2010 09:47:14 AM +0200 Pavlos Parissis
pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a APC AP9606 PDU and I am trying to find a stonith agent which
works with that PDU.
I know that this is an old thread, but
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 08:15:09PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 19:46, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
I did more testing using the clone type of fencing and worked as I
expected.
test1 hack init script to return 1 on stop and run a crm resource
On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:47 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
Does anyone know any other PDU which works out of box with the
supplied stonith agents?
I use APC AP7901, works like a charm:
primitive pdu stonith:external/rackpdu \
params pduip=10.6.6.6 community=pdu-6 hostlist=AUTO
clone
On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:12, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:47 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
Does anyone know any other PDU which works out of box with the
supplied stonith agents?
I use APC AP7901, works
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 01:58:20PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:43, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:12, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:47
On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:43, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:12, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 3:47 AM, Pavlos Parissis
On Oct 27, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 01:58:20PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:43, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:12, Vadym Chepkov
On 27 October 2010 14:09, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
[...snip...]
Hold on a sec, are you using clone on AP7901? Does it support multiple
connections? Mine it doesn't.
Then it's useless regardless clone or not, you have to have multiple
instances, because server can't reliable
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 08:34:19AM -0400, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 01:58:20PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:43, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at
Hi,
I quickly tested cloning on this fencing and it worked. I used iptables to
break the heartbeat link on node-01 and it was fenced by the other node -
the DC.
In the coming days I will test without cloning fencing device.
Cheers,
Pavlos
___
Pacemaker
On 27 October 2010 14:09, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:43, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
On 27 October 2010 13:12, Vadym Chepkov
On 27 October 2010 19:23, Vadym Chepkov vchep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 27, 2010, at 1:18 PM, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
ok, i have done the same hack but i will remove it. I think 1.1.4 will be
out before we go on production and hopefully this will be fixed in 1.1.4.
This is part of
I did more testing using the clone type of fencing and worked as I expected.
test1 hack init script to return 1 on stop and run a crm resource move on
that resource
result node it was fenced and resource was started on the other node
test2 using firewall to break the heartbeat links on node with
On 27 October 2010 19:46, Pavlos Parissis pavlos.paris...@gmail.com wrote:
I did more testing using the clone type of fencing and worked as I
expected.
test1 hack init script to return 1 on stop and run a crm resource move on
that resource
result node it was fenced and resource was started
16 matches
Mail list logo
